The heteromeric 5-HT3A/B receptor:the effect of 5-HT3B subunits on receptor structure and ligand recognition

The 5-HT3 receptors are members of the cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels. Two functional subtypes are known, the homomeric 5HT3A and the heteromeric 5HT3A/B receptors, which exhibit distinct biophysical characteristics but are difficult to differentiate pharmacologically. Atomic force microscopy has been used to determine the stoichiometry and architecture of the heteromeric 5HT3A/B receptor. Each subunit was engineered to express a unique C-terminal epitope tag, together with six sequential histidine residues to facilitate nickel affinity purification. The 5-HT3 receptors, ectopically expressed in HEK293 cells, were solubilised, purified and decorated with antibodies to the subunit specific epitope tags. Imaging of individual receptors by atomic force microscopy revealed a pentameric arrangement of subunits in the order BBABA, reading anti-clockwise when viewed from the extracellular face. Homology models for the heteromeric receptor were then constructed using both the electron microscopic structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, from Torpedo marmorata, and the X-ray crystallographic structure of the soluble acetylcholine binding protein, from Lymnaea stagnalis, as templates. These homology models were used, together with equivalent models constructed for the homomeric receptor, to interpret mutagenesis experiments designed to explore the minimal recognition differences of both the natural agonist, 5-HT, and the competitive antagonist, granisetron, for the two human receptor subtypes. The results of this work revealed that the 5-HT3B subunit residues within the ligand binding site, for both the agonist and antagonist, are accommodating to conservative mutations. They are consistent with the view that the 5-HT3A subunit provides the principal and the 5-HT38 subunit the complementary recognition interactions at the binding interface.

The Role of protein kinase C modulation in the antiproliferative effects of bistratene A, bryostatin 1 and phorbol esters

PKC-mediated signalling pathways are important in cell growth and differentiation, and aberrations in these pathways are implicated in tumourigenesis. The objective of this project was to clarify the link between cell growth inhibition and PKC modulation.The PKC activators bryostatin 1 and 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) inhibited growth in A549 and MCF-7 adenocarcinoma cells with great potency, and induced HL-60 leukaemia cell differentiation. Bistratene A affected these cells similarly. Experiments were conducted to test the hypotheses that bistratene A exerts its effects via PKC modulation and that characteristics of cytostasis induced by bryostatin 1 and TPA depend upon PKC isozyme-specific events. After incubation of A549 cells with TPA or bistratene A, 2D phosphoprotein electrophoretograrns revealed three proteins phosphorylated by both agents. However, bistratene A was unable to induce the formation of cellular networks on the basement membrane substitute Matrigel, and staurosporine was unable to reverse bistratene A-induced [3H]thymidine uptake inhibition, unlike TPA. Bistratene A did not induce PKC translocation or downregulation, activate or inhibit A549 and MCF-7 cell cytosolic PKC or compete for phorbol ester receptors. Western blot analysis and hydroxylapatite chromatography identified PKC α, ε and ζ in these cells. Bistratene A was unable to activate any of these isoforms. Therefore the agent does not exert its antiproliferative effects by modulation of PKC activity. The abilities of bryostatin 1 and TPA (10nM-1μM) to induce PKC isoform translocation and downregulation were compared with antiproliferative effects. Both agents induced dose-dependent downregulation and translocation of PKC α and ε to particulate and nuclear cell fractions. PKC ζ was translocated to the particulate fraction by both agents in MCF-7 cells. The similarity of PKC isoform redistribution by these agents did not explain their divergent effects on cell growth, and the role of nuclear translocation of PKC in cytostasis was not confirmed by these studies. Alternative factors governing the characteristics of growth inhibition induced by these agents are discussed.