Neurophysiological evaluation of convergent afferents innervating the human esophagus and area of referred pain on the anterior chest wall

Noxious stimuli in the esophagus cause pain that is referred to the anterior chest wall because of convergence of visceral and somatic afferents within the spinal cord. We sought to characterize the neurophysiological responses of these convergent spinal pain pathways in humans by studying 12 healthy subjects over three visits (V1, V2, and V3). Esophageal pain thresholds (Eso-PT) were assessed by electrical stimulation and anterior chest wall pain thresholds (ACW-PT) by use of a contact heat thermode. Esophageal evoked potentials (EEP) were recorded from the vertex following 200 electrical stimuli, and anterior chest wall evoked potentials (ACWEP) were recorded following 40 heat pulses. The fear of pain questionnaire (FPQ) was administered on V1. Statistical data are shown as point estimates of difference +/- 95% confidence interval. Pain thresholds increased between V1 and V3 [Eso-PT: V1-V3 = -17.9 mA (-27.9, -7.9) P < 0.001; ACW-PT: V1-V3 = -3.38 degrees C (-5.33, -1.42) P = 0.001]. The morphology of cortical responses from both sites was consistent and equivalent [P1, N1, P2, N2 complex, where P1 and P2 are is the first and second positive (downward) components of the CEP waveform, respectively, and N1 and N2 are the first and second negative (upward) components, respectively], indicating activation of similar cortical networks. For EEP, N1 and P2 latencies decreased between V1 and V3 [N1: V1-V3 = 13.7 (1.8, 25.4) P = 0.02; P2: V1-V3 = 32.5 (11.7, 53.2) P = 0.003], whereas amplitudes did not differ. For ACWEP, P2 latency increased between V1 and V3 [-35.9 (-60, -11.8) P = 0.005] and amplitudes decreased [P1-N1: V1-V3 = 5.4 (2.4, 8.4) P = 0.01; P2-N2: 6.8 (3.4, 10.3) P < 0.001]. The mean P1 latency of EEP over three visits was 126.6 ms and that of ACWEP was 101.6 ms, reflecting afferent transmission via Adelta fibers. There was a significant negative correlation between FPQ scores and Eso-PT on V1 (r = -0.57, P = 0.05). These data provide the first neurophysiological evidence of convergent esophageal and somatic pain pathways in humans.

Drug development:the cell wall as a drug target

The complex and essential cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis represents a plethora of new and old drug targets that collectively form an apparent mycobacterial “Achilles’ heel”. The mycolic acids are long-chain α-alkyl-β-hydroxy fatty acids (C70–90), which are unique to mycobacterial species, forming an integral component of the mycolyl–arabinogalactan–peptidoglycan complex. Their apparent uniqueness to the M. tuberculosis complex has rendered components of mycolic acid biosynthesis as powerful drug targets for specific tuberculosis (TB) chemotherapy. Here, I will discuss a contribution to TB drug discovery by deconvolution of the inhibitory mechanisms of a number of antitubercular compounds targeting mycolic acid biosynthesis. I will begin with the early days, elucidating the mode of action of ethionamide [1] and thiolactomycin [2], each targeting two separate components of the fatty acid synthase II (FAS-II) pathway. I will further discuss the recently discovered tetrahydropyrazo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carboxamide compounds [3] which selectively target the essential, catalytically silent M. tuberculosis EchA6, providing a crucial lipid shunt between β-oxidation and FAS-II and supplying lipid precursors for essential mycolate biosynthesis. Finally, I will discuss the recent discovery of the mode of action of the indazole sulfonamides [4], inhibiting M. tuberculosis KasA by, a completely novel inhibitory mechanism.