Protein modification and phospholipid oxidation

Phospholipid oxidation can generate reactive and electrophilic products that are capable of modifying proteins, especially at cysteine, lysine and histidine residues. Such lipoxidation reactions are known to alter protein structure and function, both with gain of function and loss of activity effects. As well as potential importance in the redox regulation of cell behaviour, lipoxidation products in plasma could also be useful biomarkers for stress conditions. Although studies with antibodies suggested the occurrence of lipoxidation adducts on ApoB-100, these products had not previously been characterized at a molecular level. We have developed new mass spectrometry-based approaches to detect and locate adducts of oxidized phospholipids in plasma proteins, as well as direct oxidation modifications of proteins, which avoid some of the problems typically encountered with database search engines leading to erroneous identifications of oxidative PTMs. This approach uses accurate mass extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) of fragment ions from peptides containing oxPTMs, and allows multiple modifications to be examined regardless of the protein that contains them. For example, a reporter ion at 184.074 Da/e corresponding to phosphocholine indicated the presence of oxidized phosphatidylcholine adducts, while 2 reporter ions at 100.078 and 82.025 Da/e were selective for allysine. ApoB-100-oxidized phospholipid adducts were detected even in healthy human samples, as well as LDL from patients with inflammatory disease. Lipidomic studies showed that more than 350 different species of lipid were present in LDL, and were altered in disease conditions. LDL clearly represents a very complex carrier system and one that offers a rich source of information about systemic conditions, with potential as indicators of oxidative damage in ageing or inflammatory diseases.

Aspirin and aspirin analogs on esophageal cancer

Background: Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer seen worldwide and is the sixth most common cause of death from cancer. The UK alone has over 8,000 new cases of esophageal cancer every year. Epidemiological studies have shown that low-dose daily intake of aspirin can decrease the incidence of esophageal cancer. However, its use as an anti-cancer drug has been restrained because of its side effects exerted through inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes. In our study, we have investigated the effects of a number of novel aspirin analogs on esophageal cancer cell lines. Methods: The effects of aspirin and its analogs on the viability of esophageal cancer cell lines were tested using the MTT assay. ApoSense and flow cytometric analysis were performed to examine whether aspirin analog-mediated tumor cell death is due to apoptosis or necrosis. Colorimetric assays measuring peroxidase component of cyclooxygenases were employed to screen aspirin analogs for COX inhibition. Results: Our data suggests that the anti-proliferative property of certain aspirin analogs is greater than that of aspirin itself. Benzoylsalicylates and fumaroyl diaspirin were more effective than aspirin against the oe21 squamous cell carcinoma cells and oe33 esophageal adenocarcinoma cells. Flo-1 esophageal adenocarcinoma cells showed resistance to aspirin and most of the aspirin analogs other than the benzoylsalicylates. Both diaspirin and benzoylsalicylates inhibited metabolic activity in all these esophageal cells. However, apoptosis was induced in only a small proportion. We have also shown that these aspirin analogs do not appear to inhibit COX enzymes. Conclusion: We have synthesized and characterized a number of novel aspirin analogs that are more effective against esophageal cancer cell lines than aspirin. These compounds do not exert their anti-proliferative effect through induction of apoptosis. Moreover, these analogs inability to inhibit COX enzymes suggests that they may cause fewer or no side effects compared to aspirin.