Amino acid racemization for several DSDP samples (Table 1)

Kinetic parameters for the epimerization of isoleucine in multispecific foraminiferal asemblages were used to establish the effects of burial depth and the geothermal gradient on the extent of reaction. It was observed that with a little as thirty meters of burial in a normal thermal regime there were differences between the extent of epimerization measured and that which would have been predicted for thermal equilibrium with bottom water temperatures. As would be expected, these differences are greatest when the heat flow (the geothermal gradient) and/or the sedimentation rates are highest. These effects were observed in most of the DSDP samples studied, and have been used to estimate the average heat flux since the time of sample deposition. Occasional anomalous effects were observed which could not be related to past or present heat flux. These were determined to be due to such geologic occurrences as slumping and reworking or to recent sample contamination. Other problems emerged related to bottom water temperatures including changes over geologic time which are unknown and could not be deduced. Thus, the presence of epimerization anomalies in DSDP cores as noted above limits the effectiveness of amino acid geochronology in such cores, unless these anomalies can be recognized as ab initio.

Petrology and origin of basalts at DSDP Hole 66-487

The volcanism of Central America, according to current theory (Pichler and Weyl, 1973; Stoiber and Carr, 1974; Hey, 1977), is related to the subduction of the Cocos Plate under the North American lithospheric plate and the melting of ocean crust material in the subduction zone (Green and Ringwood, 1968; Dickinson, 1970, Fitton, 1971). Since Cocos Plate subduction occurs at the rate of more than 7 cm/y. (Hey et al., 1977), basalts underlying upper Miocene sediments of the Middle America Trench outer slope, penetrated in Hole 487 (Fig. 1) during Leg 66 (Moore et al., 1979), should have formed far from their present position if current theory is accurate. Present manifestations of basaltic magmatism in adjacent areas of the Pacific derive from the axial part of the East Pacific Rise, the Galapagos spreading center, and transform fracture zones. The question arises: Are there analogs of the Middle America Trench basalts among magmatic cock associated with these modern features, or do the trench basalts have some other origin?