(Table 1) Potassium, radiogenic Argon 40 and dated age for DSDP Hole 94-608 sediments

K-Ar dates were obtained for three pillow basalt samples recovered from Site 608 (Samples 608-58-1, 103-109 cm; 608-59-1, 3-7 cm; 608-59-1, 48-53 cm). Reliable K-Ar dates cannot be routinely obtained for deep-sea igneous rocks, because they may be subject to inaccuracies related to seawater alteration (Seidemann, 1977, doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1977)88<1660:EOSAOK>2.0.CO;2) and/or the presence of excess radiogenic 40Ar (Dalrymple and Moore, 1968, doi:10.1126/science.161.3846.1132; Dymond, 1970, doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[1229:EAISBP]2.0.CO;2). Thus, the possibility that the samples dated in this study were subject to these sources of inaccuracy must be evaluated.

Geochemistry and ages at DSDP Holes 81-552A, 81-553A and 81-555

Glauconite-rich sediments have been encountered at two horizons during drilling in the southwest Rockall Plateau. The younger of these horizons lies at the base of a deep-sea ooze sequence and is of early or middle Miocene age. Glauconite formed in situ during periods of nondeposition related to strong bottom-water currents, in water depths of as much as 2500 m - five times greater than previously accepted limits for glauconite formation. The older horizon, of early Eocene age, is a record of the major transgression coincident with the separation of Rockall and Greenland. Isotopic age dating of the Miocene glauconites gives results in relatively close accord with their biostratigraphic age. However, an Eocene (NP12) glauconite gives a highly discrepant date (36.5 m.y. ago). One possible explanation is that the Eocene glauconites have continued to evolve after burial by the diagenetic uptake of potassium from the surrounding mud matrix, a possibility denied to the Miocene glauconites by the relative scarcity of available potassium in the nannofossil-foraminiferal ooze matrix.