1 resultado para Noticiability criteria
em Publishing Network for Geoscientific
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (4)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (10)
- Archive of European Integration (33)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (32)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (80)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (10)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (36)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (34)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (8)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (22)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (5)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (30)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Línguas & Letras - Unoeste (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (42)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (128)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (32)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (7)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (25)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (149)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (25)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
Brownfield rehabilitation is an essential step for sustainable land-use planning and management in the European Union. In brownfield regeneration processes, the legacy contamination plays a significant role, firstly because of the persistent contaminants in soil or groundwater which extends the existing hazards and risks well into the future; and secondly, problems from historical contamination are often more difficult to manage than contamination caused by new activities. Due to the complexity associated with the management of brownfield site rehabilitation, Decision Support Systems (DSSs) have been developed to support problem holders and stakeholders in the decision-making process encompassing all phases of the rehabilitation. This paper presents a comparative study between two DSSs, namely SADA (Spatial Analysis and Decision Assistance) and DESYRE (Decision Support System for the Requalification of Contaminated Sites), with the main objective of showing the benefits of using DSSs to introduce and process data and then to disseminate results to different stakeholders involved in the decision-making process. For this purpose, a former car manufacturing plant located in the Brasov area, Central Romania, contaminated chiefly by heavy metals and total petroleum hydrocarbons, has been selected as a case study to apply the two examined DSSs. Major results presented here concern the analysis of the functionalities of the two DSSs in order to identify similarities, differences and complementarities and, thus, to provide an indication of the most suitable integration options.