Geochemical history at DSDP Leg 56 Holes

A geological model of subduction postulated by Karig, Ingle, et al. (1975) and Karig and Sharman (1975) proposes that the sedimentary prism at the foot of the landward wall is being actively built as sediment is scraped off the subducting oceanic and plastered onto the base of the wedge, forming an accretionary wedge containing overthrust sedimentary layers or intense sedimentary folding. Because overlying layers must continually be uplifted and compressed to accommodate new matter at the base, the accreting wedge will provide a geochemical record of this process at or near the Japan Trench. Several recent papers have discussed the metalliferous sediments on the active oceanic ridges. The geochemistry of such sediments is now reasonably well known: generally these deposits are considered products of volcanic processes (Boström and Peterson, 1969; Böstrom et al., 1969; Horowitz, 1970, 1974; Cronan et al., 1972; Cronan and Garrett, 1973). The geochemistry of subduction zone sediments, however, is less well known, and the need for studies of these sediments is particularly urgent if such sediments provide a record of the effects of subduction of oceanic plates under continental crust. Because the Japan Trench contains welldeveloped subduction zone deposits, Leg 56 sampling was of utmost importance to the discovery of how they originate.

The evolutionary history of size variation of planktic foraminiferal assemblages in the Cenozoic

The iterative evolutionary radiation of planktic foraminifers is a well-documented macroevolutionary process. Here we document the accompanying size changes in entire planktic foraminiferal assemblages for the past 70 My and their relationship to paleoenvironmental changes. After the size decrease at the Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/P) boundary, high latitude assemblages remained consistently small. Size evolution in low latitudes can be divided into three major phases: the first is characterized by dwarfs (65-42 Ma), the second shows moderate size fluctuations (42-14 Ma), and in the third phase, planktic foraminifers have grown to the unprecedented sizes observed today. Our analyses of size variability with paleoproxy records indicate that periods of size increase coincided with phases of global cooling (Eocene and Neogene). These periods were characterized by enhanced latitudinal and vertical temperature gradients in the oceans and high diversity (polytaxy). In the Paleocene and during the Oligocene, the observed (minor) size changes of the largely low-diversity (oligotaxic) assemblages seem to correlate with productivity changes. However, polytaxy per se was not responsible for larger test sizes.