Geochemistry of basalts of the Indian Ocean

Indian Ocean crust formed at Sites 765 and 766 is geochemically comparable to that presently forming in the Red Sea. In both cases, we interpret the crust as reflecting high degrees of mantle melting that are associated with an enhanced thermal gradient below recently rifted continental lithosphere. Asthenospheric melts formed in this environment are rich in CaO and FeO, poor in Na2O and Al2O3, and characterized by depleted rare earth element (REE) profiles ([La/Sm]n approximately 0.5-0.6). Both the Red Sea basalts and the basalts at Sites 765 and 766 are distinct from those erupted at the present Mid-Indian Ocean Ridge. The isotope characteristics of the Site 765 basalts define a geochemical signature similar to that of the present-day Mid-Indian Ocean Ridge basalts (MIORB). The Indian Ocean mantle domain is distinct from that of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, and this distinction has persisted since Jurassic time, when the Site 765 oceanic crust was formed.

Geochemistry of evaporite in the Red Sea

One of the major shipboard findings during Leg 23 drilling in the Red Sea was the presence of late Miocene evaporites at Sites 225, 227, and 228. The top of the evaporite sequence correlates with a strong reflector (Reflector S) which has been mapped over much of the Red Sea (Ross et al., 1969, Phillips and Ross, 1970). This indicates that the Red Sea appears to be extent. Miocene sediments, including evaporites, are known from a few outcrops along the coastal plains of the Gulf of Suez to lat 14°N (Sadek, 1959, cited in Friedman, 1972; Heybroek, 1965; Friedman, 1972). Along the length of the Red Sea, the presence of Miocene salt is indicated by seismic reflection studies (Lowell and Genik, 1972) and confirmed by drilling. The recently published data from deep exploratory wells (Ahmed, 1972) demonstrate the great thickness of elastics and evaporites which were deposited in the Red Sea depression during Miocene time. The Red Sea evaporites are of the same age as the evaporites found by deep sea drilling (DSDP Leg 13) in the Mediterranean Sea. Therefore, Reflector S in the Red Sea is comparable to Reflector M in the Mediterranean. It is assumed that during Miocene time a connection between these two basins was established (Coleman, this volume) resulting in a similar origin for the evaporites deposited in the Red Sea and in the Mediterranean Sea. The origin of the Mediterranean evaporites has been discussed in great detail (Hsü et al., 1973; Nesteroff, 1973; Friedman, 1973). The formation of evaporites may be interpreted by three different hypotheses. 1) Evaporation of a shallow restricted shelf sea or lagoon which receives inflows from the open ocean. 2) Evaporation of a deep-water basin which is separated from the open ocean by a shallow sill (Schmalz, 1969). 3) Evaporation of playas or salt lakes which are situated in desiccated deep basins isolated from the open ocean (Hsü et al., 1973). The purpose of this study is to show whether one of these models might apply to the formation and deposition of the Red Sea evaporites. Therefore, a detailed petrographic and geochemical investigation was carried out.

Chemical composition of sediments from the Indian Ocean

Intensive reduction processes within bottom sediments from the Bay of Bengal lead to marked enrichment of the oxidized layer in iron and manganese. This is not observed in sediments from the Arabian Sea. Oxidized bottom sediments in central areas of the Indian Ocean show high iron concentrations, but fraction of reactive Fe in total Fe is lower. Manganese concentration increases steadily with distance from the shore to the pelagic region of the ocean, and fraction of reactive manganese also increases in the same direction. There is close correlation between total Mn and Mn(4+) in these sediments.

Ages, lithologie descriptions and mineral analyses from different DSDP holes in the Indian Ocean

The present work is based on mineralogical studies of sand and silt layers from a number of Deep Sea Drilling Project sites in the Indian Ocean belonging to different physiographic provinces of different ages. The minerals can be grouped into two major associations: a hornblende-opaque association with varying amounts of pyroxene, garnet, epidote, zircon, etc. and a biotite-chlorite-muscovite assemblage. The dominance of unstable minerals indicates a first generation, though evidence of reworking is reflected in the zircon and tourmaline grains at some sites. A large variety of minerals at some sites indicates a complex source. The mineral composition is nearly homogeneous at different sites for the entire length of the core, indicating that they have been derived from the same source during the deposition of that interval. However, the provenance changed by tectonic activity, the effect of which has been reflected in the mineralogy of some sites. An attempt was made to describe the mineralogic characteristics and their tectonic interpretations in the Pliocene and Miocene periods in the Ganges and Indus fan sites and also in the Wharton and Mozambique basin sites. Similar attempts could not be made for other ages in other physiographic provinces as the numbers of samples were too few. Within the limited scope, some idea about the mineralogical character of different basins and different physiographic provinces can be obtained from the present study. Mineralogical evidence also suggests very long transport of sediments in the deep sea. Regional variation of mineralogy has resulted due to source, sea-floor configuration, selective removal, reworking by different agencies and the processes operating in the ocean. There is no relation between a particular age and a set mineral assemblage for the Cenozoic sediments of the Indian Ocean.