Microsensor measurements in photosynthetic microbial mats

Based on combined microsensor measurements of irradiance, temperature and O2, we compared light energy budgets in photosynthetic microbial mats, with a special focus on the efficiency of light energy conservation by photosynthesis. The euphotic zones in the three studied mats differed in their phototrophic community structure, pigment concentrations and thickness. In all mats, < 1% of the absorbed light energy was conserved via photosynthesis at high incident irradiance, while the rest was dissipated as heat. Under light-limiting conditions, the photosynthetic efficiency reached a maximum, which varied among the studied mats between 4.5% and 16.2% and was significantly lower than the theoretical maximum of 27.7%. The maximum efficiency correlated linearly with the light attenuation coefficient and photopigment concentration in the euphotic zone. Higher photosynthetic efficiency was found in mats with a thinner and more densely populated euphotic zone. Microbial mats exhibit a lower photosynthetic efficiency compared with ecosystems with a more open canopy-like organization of photosynthetic elements, where light propagation is not hindered to the same extent by photosynthetically inactive components; such components contributed about 40-80% to light absorption in the investigated microbial mats, which is in a similar range as in oceanic planktonic systems.

(Table T1) Fluid inclusions in siltstone and sandstone grains from ODP Hole 210-1276A

Twenty samples of siltstones and sandstones were taken from Ocean Drilling Program Site 1276 during Leg 210 for fluid inclusion studies. With the exception of one sample of vein calcite, all inclusions were in quartz grains. The results of fluid-inclusion petrology and microthermometry indicate the presence of three fluid inclusion types (Types 1, 2, and 3). Type 1 fluid inclusions are two-phase (liquid + vapor) aqueous inclusions, and Type 2 inclusions are monophase fluid inclusions (liquid or vapor). These are common in all samples and are formed either as primary isolated inclusions or as secondary inclusions as trails along annealed fractures in the grain. Type 3 fluid inclusions are three-phase (liquid + vapor + solid) inclusions. Type 3 inclusions are rare and are observed as isolated inclusions or in a cluster with other types (i.e., Types 1 and 2). The predominant population throughout the different units sampled is two-phase (liquid + vapor) aqueous fluid inclusions (i.e., Type 1). The temperature of homogenization (TH) bivariate plots for Type 1 inclusions shows dominance throughout the hole of low- to medium-salinity fluids with minimum trapping temperatures between 150° and 400°C.