391 resultados para POSTDEPOSITIONAL REMANENT MAGNETIZATION
Resumo:
Paleomagnetic analyses of the natural remanent magnetization of >1700 vertically oriented sediment samples from Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Holes U1319A, U1320A, U1322B, and U1324B in the northern Gulf of Mexico reveal complex magnetostratographic signals for the Brazos-Trinity and Ursa region carried by detrital iron oxide minerals. Additionally, gyroremanent magnetization was observed to form during alternating-field demagnetization of samples containing an enhanced amount of magnetic iron sulfide minerals. Most characteristic remanent magnetization inclinations are reasonable for the site latitudes. Stable declinations allow for azimuth correction of the formerly unoriented drill cores.
Resumo:
Basalts from Hole 534A are among the oldest recovered from the ocean bottom, dating from the opening of the Atlantic 155 Ma. Upon exposure to a 1-Oe field for one week, these basalts acquire a viscous remanent magnetization (VRM), which ranges from 4 to 223% of their natural remanent magnetization (NRM). A magnetic field of similar magnitude is observed in the paleomagnetic lab of the Glomar Challenger, and it is therefore doubtful if accurate measurements of magnetic moment in such rocks can be made on board unless the paleomagnetic area is magnetically shielded. No correlation is observed between the Konigsberger ratio (beta), which is usually less than 3, and the ability to acquire a VRM. The VRM shows both a log t dependence and a Richter aftereffect. Both of these, but especially the log t dependence, will cause the susceptibility measurements (made by applying a magnetic field for a very short time) to be minimum values. The susceptibility and derived Q should therefore be used cautiously for magnetic anomaly interpretation, because they can cause the importance of the induced magnetization to be underestimated.
Resumo:
The major magnetic mineral in the turbidites and slumped sediments recovered at Leg 73 drill sites was near to magnetite in composition and in the form of small multidomain particles. There was no variation in magnetic mineralogy with the lithology. The variations in the intensities and directions of the natural remanent magnetization could be explained in terms of postdepositional grain rotations within the wet sediment. In the sands realignment was partial, whereas in some of the slumps the entire remanent magnetization was reset. Fine-particle magnetite was also the main magnetic constituent of the red clays. A significant proportion of a higher-coercivity mineral was also present. The magnetic characteristics of the red clays are explained as a combination of concentration and grain rotation effects. The implications to the assessment of the reliability of paleomagnetic data are discussed. Note: Conversion factors are as follows: 1 Am**2/kg = 1 emu/g, and 80 A/m about 1 Oe.