Biomass of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in 1997 during the Cooperative Marine Science Program for the Black Sea (CoMSBlack)

The "15BO1997001" dataset is based on samples collected in the spring of 1997. The whole dataset is composed of 66 samples (from 27 stations of National Monitoring Sampling Grid) with data of zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 0-20, 0-50, 10-25, 25-50, 50-100 and from bottom up to the surface at depths depending on water column stratification and the thermocline depth. The collected material was analysed using the method of Dimov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Asen Konsulov using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972 ). The biomass was estimated as wet weight by Petipa, 1959 (based on species specific wet weight). Wet weight values were transformed to dry weight using the equation DW=0.16*WW as suggested by Vinogradov & Shushkina, 1987. The collected material was analysed using the method of Dimov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Asen Konsulov using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972 ). The biomass was estimated as wet weight by Petipa, 1959 ussing standard average weight of each species in mg/m3. WW were converted to DW by equation DW=0.16*WW (Vinogradov ME, Sushkina EA, 1987).

Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in summer 1991 during the NATO Programme Hydroblack

The "Hydroblack91" dataset is based on samples collected in the summer of 1991 and covers part of North-Western in front of Romanian coast and Western Black Sea (Bulgarian coasts) (between 43°30' - 42°10' N latitude and 28°40'- 31°45' E longitude). Mesozooplankton sampling was undertaken at 20 stations. The whole dataset is composed of 72 samples with data of zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 0-20, 0-50, 10-25, 25-50, 50-100 and from bottom up to the surface at depths depending on water column stratification and the thermocline depth. Zooplankton samples were collected with vertical closing Juday net,diameter - 36cm, mesh size 150 µm. Tows were performed from surface down to bottom meters depths in discrete layers. Samples were preserved by a 4% formaldehyde sea water buffered solution. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length Mesozooplankton abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Asen Konsulov using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). Taxon-specific abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Asen Konsulov using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972).

Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in spring 2002 during the National Monitoring Programme of the Bulgarian Institute of Oceanography

The dataset is based on samples collected in the spring of 2002 in the Western Black Sea in front of Bulgaria coast. The whole dataset is composed of 76 samples (from 27 stations of National Monitoring Grid) with data of mesozooplankton species composition abundance and biomass. Sampling on zooplankton was performed from bottom up to the surface at depths depending on water column stratification and the thermocline depth. Zooplankton samples were collected with vertical closing Juday net,diameter - 36cm, mesh size 150 µm. Tows were performed from surface down to bottom meters depths in discrete layers. Samples were preserved by a 4% formaldehyde sea water buffered solution. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Mesozooplankton abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Kremena Stefanova using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). Taxon-specific abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Kremena Stefanova using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972).

Abundance and biomass of mesozooplankton in the western Black sea during Steaua de Mare cruise in 1982 and 1983

The Poluare 1982-1983 dataset contains zooplankton data collected allong 7 transect in front of the Romanian littoral. Zooplankton sampling was undertaken at 14 stations where samples were collected using a Juday closing net in the 0-2m layer . The dataset includes samples analysed for mesozooplankton species composition and abundance. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Total biomass was estimated using a tabel with wet weight for each species an stage. Taxon-specific mesozooplankton abundance was counted under the microscope.

Abundance and biomass of zooplankton collected monthly from January 1977 to december 1977 in front of Constanta city, Black Sea

The Est Constanta 1977 dataset contains zooplankton data collected monthly from January 1977 to december 1977 allong a 5 station transect in front of the city Constanta (44°10'N, 28°41.5'E - EC1; 44°10'N, 28°47'E - EC2; 44°10'N, 28°54'E - EC3; 44°10'N, 29°08'E - EC4; 44°10'N, 29°22'E - EC5). Zooplankton sampling was undertaken at 5 stations where samples were collected using a Juday closing net in the 0-10, 10-25, 25-50m layer (depending also on the water masses). The dataset includes samples analysed for mesozooplankton species composition and abundance. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Taxon-specific mesozooplankton abundance was count under microscope. Total abundance is the sum of the counted individuals. Total biomass Fodder, Rotifera , Ctenophora and Noctiluca was estimated using a tabel with wet weight for each species an stage.

Results of the sorting of the mikronekton and zooplankton material sampled by the German Antarctic Expedition 1975/1976

A description is given of the taxa sorted out of the zooplanktion and mikronekton material of the 1st German Antarctic Expedition 1975/76 by the Kiel sorting center. The methods employed in the sorting center are describined in detail. Notes for further use of the material are also given.

Composition of sediments from the north-west African continental margin

Entlang dreier Profile vom NW-afrikanischen Kontinentalrand wurden Oberflächensedimente aus Wassertiefen zwischen 39m und 1514m auf ihre Zusammensetzung der Sandfraktion, auf ihre Gehalte an Karbonat und organischer Substanzen sowie auf ihre mineralogische Zusammensetzung hin untersucht. 1) Die auf dem Schelf und dem oberen Hang abgelagerten Sedimente (<500m) zeichnen sich durch hohe Sandgehalte (>70%) und durch hohe Grob/Fein-Verhältnisse aus. Unterhalb dieses Bereiches nimmt der Einfluß von Strömungen, die die Ablagerung von wesentlichen Mengen an Feinmaterial oberhalb 500m verhindern, ab, wie die starke Abnahme des Sandgehaltes, des Quarz/Glimmer und des Grob/Fein-Verhältnisses zeigen. Die Sedimente aus diesen Wassertiefen werden zum großen Teil aus Partikeln der Siltfraktion aufgebaut. Mit zunehmender Tiefe ist auch eine Zunahme der Tonfraktion zu beobachten, wobei höhere Tonanteile (>10%) erst in Tiefen unterhalb von 1200m auftreten. 2) Die quantitative Komponentenanalyse der Sandfraktion zeigt, daß der karbonatische Anteil fast ausschließlich biogener Herkunft ist. Er besteht zum wesentlichen Teil aus planktonischen Komponenten, vorwiegend Foraminiferen und mengenmäßig nur sehr untergeordnet auftretenden Pteropoden. Das opalkieselige Plankton (Diatomeen, Radiolarien) ist nur in geringen Mengen in den untersuchten Proben vorhanden. Auch das Benthos stellt nur eine untergeordnete Komponente der Sandfraktion dar. Vor allem der Anteil von Foraminiferen und Mollusken nimmt mit zunehmender Wassertiefe relativ deutlich ab. Die übrigen benthonischen Komponenten sind im Sediment nur in geringen Anteilen vertreten. 3) Hauptsedimentbildner im Profil Nouakchott sind die nichtbiogenen, terrigen-detritischen Sandkomponenten. Sie bestehen vorwiegend aus Quarz und mit zunehmender Wassertiefe aus Kotpillen bzw. Kotpillenaggregaten. Je nach Tiefe treten vor allem Glimmer (>1000m) und Glaukonit (<800m) hinzu. Die restlichen Komponenten treten nur gelegentlich und in äußerst geringen Mengen im rezenten Oberflächensediment auf. 4) Quarz wird als Windstaub mit dem NE-Passat und vor allem durch den "Harmattan" aus der Sahara heraustransportiert und vorwiegend über dem Schelfbereich sedimentiert. Windstaubmaterial besteht primär weitgehend aus Siltkorngrößen, die vor Nouakchott über die Schelfkante hinaustransportiert werden und zu einer Grobsiltanreicherung am mittleren Hang führen. 5) Das Verhältnis zwischen den karbonatischen Biogenkomponenten und den nichtbiogenen Partikeln spiegelt sich deutlich in der Karbonatverteilung sowohl des Gesamtsedimentes als auch der Sandfraktion wider. Relativ hohe Karbonatgehalte vor Cap Leven im Norden stehen sehr geringen Anteilen von Nouakchott gegenüber. Mit zunehmender Wassertiefe ist eine deutliche Abnahme des Karbonatanteils zu verfolgen. 6) Die Tatsache, daß das Profil Cap Blanc im Bereich des ganzjährigen Auftriebs liegt, spiegelt sich nicht in der Zusammensetzung der Sandfraktion wider. Südlich der Zone des ganzjährigen Auftriebs weisen verschiedene Parameter (Radiolarien, Diatomeen, Verhältnis von Radiolarien zu planktonischen Foraminiferen, Benthos/Plankton-Verhältnis der Foraminiferen) trotz abnehmender Auftriebsintensität eher steigende Werte auf. Dies ist wesentlich auf eine infolge des Nährstoffeintrages durch Flußzufuhr bedingte Verschiebung der maximalen Primärproduktion weit in südliche Richtung zurückzuführen. 7) In den aufgeführten Parametern zeigen sich von Profil zu Profil sehr deutliche fazielle Unterschiede, obwohl der großklimatische Hintergrund im gesamten Untersuchungsgebiet etwa gleich ist. Vor Cap Leven bildet sich eine Fazies, die im wesentlichen aus planktonischen Foraminiferen besteht, während das Sediment vor Nouakchott zum überwiegenden Teil aus nichtbiogenen Komponenten aufgebaut wird. Im Übergangsbereich vor Cap Blanc bildet sich eine Mischfazies, die keinerlei Prägung durch das Auftriebsgeschehen erhält. Die Ursachen dieser faziellen Unterschiede werden auf fehlenden Terrigeneinfluß vor Cap Leven einerseits und hohe Terrigenanlieferung vor Nouakchott andererseits zurückgeführt. 8) Die Zusammensetzung und Verteilung der rezenten Grobfraktionssedimente am Kontinentalrand vor Nw-Afrika wird somit im wesentlichen als Ergebnis einer Überprägung der Biogenanlieferung durch nichtbiogene Komponenten angesehen. Wesentlicher steuernder Faktor ist demnach das hier vorherrschende Windsystem.

Abundance of mesozooplankton in the Mediterranean Sea during PELMED 1995 and PELMED 1996

The PELMED-ECOPEL dataset contains mesozooplankton data collected in 1995-1996 in the Gulf of Lion (North Western Mediterranean Sea) between 43°35' N, 2°50' E and 42°15' N, 6°15' E. Zooplankton taxonomy-related abundance per unit volume of the water column.

MARECHIARA-mesozooplankton long-term time-series at the fixed coastal station in the Gulf of Naples: abundance and biomass, data for the years 1984-2006

The MARECHIARA-mesozooplankton dataset contains mesozooplankton data collected in the ongoing time-series at Sation MC (40°48.5' N, 14°15' E) in the Gulf of Naples. This dataset spans over the period 1984-2006 and contains data of mesozooplankton abundance and species composition as well as biomass (as dry weight). Mesozooplankton was regularly sampled in 1984-1990 and 1995-2006, only a few samples were collected in 1991-1992 and no samples in 1993-1994. During the first period of the series sampling frequency was fortnightly, and weekly since 1995.

Abundance of mesozooplankton from nine cruises in Northern Adriatic Sea during NA64

The NA64-Mesozooplankton dataset contains biogeochemistry and mesozooplankton data collected in a series of 9 cruises in the Northern Adriatic completed from January 1965 to September 1965 monthly, and December 1965. Biogeochemistry sampling was undertaken using 5L Nansen bottles fired at 0m, 5m, 10m, 20m, 30m and/or bottom depths. The dataset includes 709 samples analysed for nitrate, phosphate, temperature, salinity and density. Mesozooplankton sampling was undertaken at the same locations as for biogeochemistry, using two different net (Hensen non-closing and Appstein closing net). The dataset includes 146 samples analysed for mesozooplankton composition (at higher taxonomic level), abundance and volume settlement. After sedimentation and volume measurement, the fish larva and fish eggs were extracted from samples (egss of Engraulis encrasicholus were determined). Chaetognaths were partly isolated. Identification at higher taxonomic level of zooplankters was completed. Taxonomic identification was done at Smithonian Mediterranean Centre in Salambo. After sedimentation and volume measurement, the fish larva and fish eggs were extracted from samples (egss of Engraulis encrasicholus were determined). Chaetognaths were partly isolated. Identification at higher taxonomic level of zooplankters was completed. Taxonomic identification was done at Smithonian Mediterranean Centre in Salambo.