Abundance and biomass of the benthic infauna of the North Sea

In 1986 participants of the Benthos Ecology Working Group of ICES conducted a synoptic mapping of the infauna of the southern and central North Sea. Together with a mapping of the infauna of the northern North Sea by Eleftheriou and Basford (1989, doi:10.1017/S0025315400049158) this provides the database for the description of the benthic infauna of the whole North Sea in this paper. Division of the infauna into assemblages by TWINSPAN analysis separated northern assemblages from southern assemblages along the 70 m depth contour. Assemblages were further separated by the 30, 50 m and 100 m depth contour as well as by the sediment type. In addition to widely distributed species, cold water species do not occur further south than the northern edge of the Dogger Bank, which corresponds to the 50 m depth contour. Warm water species were not found north of the 100 m depth contour. Some species occur on all types of sediment but most are restricted to a special sediment and therefore these species are limited in their distribution. The factors structuring species distributions and assemblages seem to be temperature, the influence of different water masses, e.g. Atlantic water, the type of sediment and the food supply to the benthos.

(Table 1) Physical properties of basalts from DSDP Legs 69 and 70

Physical properties of basalts from Deep Sea Drilling Project Sites 504 and 505, south of the Costa Rica Rift, including wet-bulk density, water content, sonic velocity, and thermal conductivity, were measured on board D/V Glomar Challenger during Legs 69 and 70. The mean wet-bulk density is 2.90±0.06 g/cm**3, porosity 5.0±2.2%, sonic velocity 5.75±0.30 km/s, and thermal conductivity 1.67±0.09 W/m°K. Basalts from this young ocean crust (5.9 m.y.) have relatively low porosity and consequently high density and sonic velocity, as compared to average DSDP basalts. Some systematic trends in depth variation of physical properties were found: down to Core 40 in Hole 504B, grain densities were lower than those deeper in the hole, whereas porosity in the upper section was higher. This can be attributed either to differences in the flow type or in the nature of alteration of basalts at the different levels in the hole.