1 resultado para analytic torsion
em University of Connecticut - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (47)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (40)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (11)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (20)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (20)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (10)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (6)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (33)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (149)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (25)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (252)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (37)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (19)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (111)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (8)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
It is important to check the fundamental assumption of most popular Item Response Theory models, unidimensionality. However, it is hard for educational and psychological tests to be strictly unidimensional. The tests studied in this paper are from a standardized high-stake testing program. They feature potential multidimensionality by presenting various item types and item sets. Confirmatory factor analyses with one-factor and bifactor models, and based on both linear structural equation modeling approach and nonlinear IRT approach were conducted. The competing models were compared and the implications of the bifactor model for checking essential unidimensionality were discussed.