1 resultado para Punitive damages
em University of Connecticut - USA
Filtro por publicador
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (3)
- Aquatic Commons (16)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (9)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (52)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (3)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (30)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (29)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (12)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (18)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy - Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (8)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (15)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (33)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (37)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (132)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (7)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (8)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (23)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (7)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (253)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (14)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (54)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (58)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (7)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (6)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
The traditional law of leases imposed no duty on landlords to mitigate damages in the event of tenant breach, whereas the modern law of leases does. An economic model of leases, in which absentee tenants may or may not intend to breach, shows that the traditional rule promotes tenant investment in the property by discouraging landlord entry. In contrast, the modern rule prevents the property from being left idle by encouraging landlords to enter and re-let abandoned property. The model reflects the historic use of the traditional rule for agricultural leases, where absentee use was valuable, and the emergence of the modern rule for residential leases, where the primary use entails continuous occupation.