3 resultados para Human Sciences
em University of Connecticut - USA
Resumo:
Healthy oceans and healthy humans are inseparable. This article discusses new pharmaceuticals that are coming from the sea, and also ocean problems like harmful algal blooms that impact humans.
Resumo:
Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) have the potential to differentiate to all adult somatic cells. This property makes hESCs a very promising area of research for the treatment of disorders in which specific cell populations need to be restored. Despite this potential, research that focuses on producing mesodermally derived cell populations from hESCs is decidedly limited, notwithstanding the prevalence of disorders involving mesodermal tissues for which treatment options are limited. Skeletal muscle myoblasts are derivatives of mesodermal cells and are characterized by the expression of the MyoD gene. These cells are difficult to obtain from hESCs in a reproducible and efficient manner. Recent developments in the field have showed some success in obtaining myogenic cells from hESCs through a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-like intermediate population. MSCs, which are an adult stem cell population typically derived from the bone marrow, are capable of generating multiple cell types including skeletal muscle. The aim of this study was to develop an efficient method that derives myoblasts from an MSC-like intermediate. To accomplish this goal, we first set out to isolate and expand the MSC-like intermediate from hESCs differentiated in vitro. Difficulties in reproducing published cell-differentiation methodologies, which represent a significant and familiar challenge in hESC research, are highlighted in this report.
Resumo:
With its turbulent and volatile legal evolution, the right to an abortion in the United States still remains a highly contested issue and has developed into one of the most divisive topics within modern legal discourse. By deconstructing the political underpinnings and legal rationale of the right to an abortion through a systematic case law analysis, I will demonstrate that this right has been incrementally destabilized. This instability embedded in abortion jurisprudence has been primarily produced by a combination of textual ambiguity in the case law and judicial ambivalence regarding this complex area of law. In addition, I argue that the use of the largely discredited substantive due process doctrine to ground this contentious right has also contributed to the lack of legal stability. I assert that when these elements culminate in the realm of reproductive privacy the right to terminate a pregnancy becomes increasingly unstable and contested.