Assessing the Phylogenetic Utility of DNA Barcoding Using the New Zealand Cicada Genus Kikihia

DNA Barcoding (Hebert et al. 2003) has the potential to revolutionize the process of identifying and cataloguing biodiversity; however, significant controversy surrounds some of the proposed applications. In the seven years since DNA barcoding was introduced, the Web of Science records more than 600 studies that have weighed the pros and cons of this procedure. Unfortunately, the scientific community has been unable to come to any consensus on what threshold to use to differentiate species or even whether the barcoding region provides enough information to serve as an accurate species identification tool. The purpose of my thesis is to analyze mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) barcoding’s potential to identify known species and provide a well-resolved phylogeny for the New Zealand cicada genus Kikihia. In order to do this, I created a phylogenetic tree for species in the genus Kikihia based solely on the barcoding region and compared it to a phylogeny previously created by Marshall et al. (2008) that benefits from information from other mtDNA and nuclear genes as well as species-specific song data. I determined how well the barcoding region delimits species that have been recognized based on morphology and song. In addition, I looked at the effect of sampling on the success of barcoding studies. I analyzed subsets of a larger, more densely sampled dataset for the Kikihia Muta Group to determine which aspects of my sampling strategy led to the most accurate identifications. Since DNA barcoding would by definition have problems in diagnosing hybrid individuals, I studied two species (K. “murihikua” and K. angusta) that are known to hybridize. Individuals that were not obvious hybrids (determined by morphology) were selected for the case study. Phylogenetic analysis of the barcoding region revealed insights into the reasons these two species could not be successfully differentiated using barcoding alone.

Determinants and Effects of Maturity Mismatches in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Bank Level Data

Despite the extensive work on currency mismatches, research on the determinants and effects of maturity mismatches is scarce. In this paper I show that emerging market maturity mismatches are negatively affected by capital inflows and price volatilities. Furthermore, I find that banks with low maturity mismatches are more profitable during crisis periods but less profitable otherwise. The later result implies that banks face a tradeoff between higher returns and risk, hence channeling short term capital into long term loans is caused by cronyism and implicit guarantees rather than the depth of the financial market. The positive relationship between maturity mismatches and price volatility, on the other hand, shows that the banks of countries with high exchange rate and interest rate volatilities can not, or choose not to hedge themselves. These results follow from a panel regression on a data set I constructed by merging bank level data with aggregate data. This is advantageous over traditional studies which focus only on aggregate data.