1 resultado para Case Law
em University of Connecticut - USA
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (32)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (3)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (31)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (95)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (12)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (13)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (44)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (82)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (11)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (29)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (11)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (8)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (99)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (194)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (42)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (21)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (8)
Resumo:
With its turbulent and volatile legal evolution, the right to an abortion in the United States still remains a highly contested issue and has developed into one of the most divisive topics within modern legal discourse. By deconstructing the political underpinnings and legal rationale of the right to an abortion through a systematic case law analysis, I will demonstrate that this right has been incrementally destabilized. This instability embedded in abortion jurisprudence has been primarily produced by a combination of textual ambiguity in the case law and judicial ambivalence regarding this complex area of law. In addition, I argue that the use of the largely discredited substantive due process doctrine to ground this contentious right has also contributed to the lack of legal stability. I assert that when these elements culminate in the realm of reproductive privacy the right to terminate a pregnancy becomes increasingly unstable and contested.