1 resultado para Australian common law
em University of Connecticut - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Archive of European Integration (9)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (2)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (2)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (2)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Carolina Law Scholarship Repository (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (18)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (169)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (58)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (465)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (12)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (5)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia (1)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (37)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (54)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (22)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
The claim that the common law displays an economic logic is a centerpiece of the positive economic theory of law. A key question in this literature is whether this outcome is due to the conscious efforts of judges, or the result of invisible hand processes. This paper develops a model in which to two effects combine to determine the direction of legal change. The main conclusions are, first, that judicial bias can prevent the law from evolving toward efficiency if the fraction of judges biased against the efficient rule is large enough; and second, that precedent affects the rate of legal change but not its direction.