1 resultado para AGRI-FACTS
em University of Connecticut - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (10)
- Archive of European Integration (25)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (15)
- Argos - Repositorio Institucional de la Secretaría de Investigación y Postgrado de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Misiones (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (12)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (13)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (7)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (24)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- CaltechTHESIS (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (28)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (4)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (8)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (28)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (6)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (9)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (34)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (22)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (23)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (122)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (18)
- Repositorio Institucional UNISALLE - Colombia (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (2)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (25)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (415)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (9)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
This small pilot study compared the effectiveness of two interventions to improve automaticity with basic addition facts: Taped Problems (TP) and Cover, Copy, Compare (CCC), in students aged 6-10. Automaticity was measured using Mathematics Curriculum-Based Measurement (M-CBM) at pretest, after 10 days, and after 20 days of intervention. Our hypothesis was that the TP group will gain higher levels of automaticity more quickly than the CCC and control groups. However, when gain scores were compared, no significant differences were found between groups. Limitations to the study include low treatment integrity and a short duration of intervention.