The effects of ultraviolet B radiation on immune responses to {\it Borrelia burgdorferi}, the causative agent of Lyme disease

Ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation, in addition to being carcinogenic, is also immunosuppressive. Immunologically, UVB induces suppression locally, at the site of irradiation, or systemically, by inducing the production of a variety of immunosuppressive cytokines. Systemic effects include suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to a variety of antigens (e.g. haptens, proteins, bacterial antigens, or alloantigens). One of the principal mediators of UV-induced immune suppression is the T helper-2 (Th2) cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10); this suggests that UV irradiation induces suppression by shifting the immune response from a Th1 (cellular) to a Th2 (humoral) response. These "opposing" T helper responses are usually mutually exclusive, and polarized Th1 or Th2 responses may lead to either protection from infection or increased susceptibility to disease, depending on the infectious agent and the route of infection.^ This study examines the effects of UVB irradiation on cellular and humoral responses to Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the causative agent of Lyme disease (LD) in both immunization and infectious disease models; in addition, it examines the role of T cells in protection from and pathology of Bb infection. Particular emphasis is placed on the Bb-specific antibody responses following irradiation since UVB effects on humoral immunity are not fully understood. Mice were irradiated with a single dose of UV and then immunized (in complete Freund's adjuvant) or infected with Bb (intradermally at the base of the tail) in order to examine both DTH and antibody responses in both systems. UVB suppressed the Th1-associated antibodies IgG2a and IgG2b in both systems, as well as the DTH response to Bb in a dose dependent manner. Injection of anti-IL-10 antibody into UV-irradiated mice within 24 h after UV exposure restored the DTH response, as well as the Th1 antibody (IgG2a and IgG2b) response. In addition, injecting recombinant IL-10 mimicked some of the effects of UV radiation.^ Bb-specific Th1 T cell lines (BAT2.1-2.3) were generated to examine the role of T cells in Lyme borreliosis. All lines were CD4$\sp+,$ $\alpha\beta\sp+$ and proliferated specifically in response to Bb. The BAT2 cell lines not only conferred a DTH response to naive C3H recipients, but reduced the number of organisms recovered from the blood and tissues of mice infected with Bb. Furthermore, BAT2 cell lines protected mice from Bb-induced periarthritis. ^

E2F1's role in ultraviolet-induced DNA damage response

The E2F1 transcription factor is a well-known regulator of cell proliferation and apoptosis, but its role in the DNA damage response is less clear. It has been shown that E2F1 becomes stabilized in response to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and accumulates at sites of DSBs. This process requires ATM kinase and serine 31 phosphorylation, which provides a binding site for TopBp1. However, the role of E2F1 at sites of DNA damage is not clear. We expanded the study of E2F1's role in the DNA damage response by exploring its functions in ultraviolet (UV) induced DNA damage, and identified that E2F1 promotes DNA repair and cell survival. To further investigate the mechanisms underlying our findings, we examined the possibility for direct involvement of E2F1 in DNA repair. We found that E2F1 localizes to sites of UV irradiation-induced DNA damage dependent on the ATR kinase and serine 31 of E2F1. E2F1 also associates with the GCN5 histone acetyltransferase in response to UV irradiation and recruits GCN5 to sites of DNA damage. This correlates with an increase in histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) acetylation and chromatin relaxation. In the absence of E2F1 or GCN5, nucleotide excision repair (NER) proteins do not efficiently localize to sites of UV damage and DNA repair is impaired. E2F1 mutants unable to bind DNA or activate transcription retain the ability to stimulate NER. These findings demonstrate a non-transcriptional role for E2F1 in DNA repair involving GCN5-mediated H3K9 acetylation and increased accessibility to the NER machinery. ^

Immunologic characteristics of immunogenic variants generated by {\it in vitro\/} treatment of a methylcholanthrene-induced murine fibrosarcoma MCA-F with 1 methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine, 5 -aza-2$\sp\prime$-deoxycytidine, or ultraviolet radiation

This study addresses the questions of whether the frequency of generation and in vivo cross-reactivity of highly immunogenic tumor clones induced in a single parental murine fibrosarcoma cell line MCA-F is more closely related to the agent used to induce the Imm$\sp{+}$ clone or whether these characteristics are independent of the agents used. These questions were addressed by treating the parental tumor cell line MCA-F with UV-B radiation (UV-B), 1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), or 5-aza-2$\sp\prime$-deoxycytidine (5-azaCdR). The frequency of Imm$\sp{+}$ variant generation was similarly high for the three different agents, suggesting that the frequency of Imm$\sp{+}$ generation was related more closely to the cell line than to the inducing agent used. Cross-reactivity was tested with two Imm$\sp{+}$ clones from each treatment group in a modified immunoprotection assay that selectively engendered antivariant, but not antiparental immunity. Under these conditions each clone, except one, immunized against itself. The MNNG-induced clones engendered stronger antivariant immunity but a weaker variant cross-reactive immunity could also be detected.^ This study also characterized the lymphocyte populations responsible for antivariant and antiparental immunity in vivo. Using the local adoptive transfer assay (LATA) and antibody plus complement depletion of T-cell subsets, we showed that immunity induced by the Imm$\sp{+}$ variants against the parent MCA-F was transferred by the Thy1.2$\sp{+}$, L3T4a$\sp{+}$, Lyt2.1$\sp{-}$ (CD4$\sp{+}$) population, without an apparent contribution by Thy1.2$\sp{+}$, L3T4a$\sp{-}$, Lyt2.1$\sp{+}$ (CD8$\sp{+}$) cells. A role for Lyt2.1$\sp{+}$T lymphocytes in antivariant, but not antiparent immunity was supported by the results of LATA and CTL assays. Immunization with low numbers of viable Imm$\sp{+}$ cells, or with high numbers of non viable Imm$\sp{+}$ cells engendered only antivariant immunity without parental cross-protection. The associative recognition of parental antigens and variant neoantigens resulting in strong antiparent immunity was investigated using somatic cells hybrids of Imm$\sp{+}$ variants of MCA-F and an antigenically distinct tumor MCA-D. An unexpected result of these latter experiments was the expression of a unique tumor-specific antigen by the hybrid cells. These studies demonstrate that the parental tumor-specific antigen and the variant neoantigen must be coexpressed on the cell surface to engender parental cross-protective immunity. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.) ^