Behavioral cognitions and factors related to hepatitis B vaccine acceptance and compliance in a cohort of drug users in Houston, Texas

Purpose. Drug users are a large group of those at highest risk for contracting Hepatitis B (HBV). This study sought to identify predictors of HBV vaccine acceptance and compliance in a cohort of current drug users in Houston, Texas. Perceived severity of HBV, perceived risk of HBV, perceived peer support of HBV vaccine, and perceived benefits of HBV vaccine were also examined assess their relationship to HBV compliance. ^ Methods. A randomized intervention study was conducted in a cohort of current drug users in Houston, Texas. Participants were recruited by community outreach workers from two urban neighborhoods in Houston known for high drug use. Participants were randomized to a standard vaccine schedule group or an accelerated vaccine schedule group. Participants were also randomized to either a standard behavioral intervention group or an enhanced behavioral intervention group designed to increase HBV vaccine acceptance and compliance. Baseline visits included an interview for demographic factors, drug and sexual behaviors, and HBV beliefs; and participants received the first dose of the HBV vaccine and one of the behavioral interventions. ^ Results. Of 1,643 screening participants, 77% accepted the HBV vaccine. Participants ages ≥50 were twice as likely to accept the vaccine. African Americans and less frequent drug users were also significantly more likely to accept the vaccine. Of the 1,259 participants who enrolled in the study, 75% were compliant to the HBV vaccine. Predictors of compliance were found to be race, housing status, and alcohol use. Speedball users were found to be 74% less likely to be compliant the HBV vaccine. None of the behavioral constructs assessed were found to significantly predict HBV compliance. However, additional analyses found that there were significant changes in mean scores of the behavioral concepts when measured at six month follow-up. ^ Conclusion. Results from this study indicate that when offered a free vaccine in the drug user community, a large percentage will be compliant to the vaccine series. The behavioral cognitions commonly used in HBV compliance research need to be extended to accurately fit this cohort. Also, vaccine intervention focus needs to be on reaching the homeless segment of the drug users and the speedball users. ^

Charity care and community benefits by hospital type in Texas

Hospital care is the largest component of the health care sector. This industry is made up of for profit hospital (FPH) organizations, not for profit (NFP) hospitals, and government (GOV) run hospital facilities. Objectives of this analysis were: (a) to conduct a literature review on NFP hospital legislation at the state level in Texas and at the federal level in the broader U.S.; and (b) to describe the types of charity care and community benefits currently being provided: by NFP hospitals compared to FPH hospitals and GOV hospitals; by hospitals geographic proximity to the Texas-Mexico border; and by hospital community type (rural, suburban, and urban); and (c) propose specific policy changes that may be needed to improve the current Texas State statute. Methods. In describing the historical and current policy context of NFP hospital legislation in the United States, federal legislation was reviewed from 1913 to the present and Texas State legislation was reviewed from 1980 to the present. In describing the provision of charity care, data from the 2008 Annual Cooperative Hospital Survey were examined by hospital organizational type, size, proximity to the border, and community type using linear regression and chi-squared tests to assess differences in charity care and community benefits. Results. The data included 123 NFP hospitals, 114 GOV hospitals, and 123 FPH. Results. Small sized (p<0.001) and medium sized (p<0.001) NFP hospitals provide a greater percent of total charity care when compared to FPH hospitals and to both GOV and FPH hospitals respectively; however, no significant difference in total charity care was found among large sized NFP hospitals when compared to FPH hospitals alone (p=.345) and both GOV and FPH facilities (p=.214). The amount of charity care provided was not found to be different based on proximity to the border or community type. Community benefit planning and budgeting was found to be similar regardless of community type and proximity to the border. Conclusion. No differences in charity care in Texas were found for large sized NFP hospitals compared to FPH and GOV hospitals. Contrary to widely held beliefs, this study did not find the border region to provide a greater amount of charity care or bad debt. Charity care also did not vary by community type. These findings underscore the need for continued collection of transparent data from all hospitals in order to provide policy makers and consumers with information on utilization trends to ensure benefits are being provided to the community. Policy changes or revoking tax-benefits may occur as charity care utilization declines with the implementation of health reform in the next few years.^