Protein-Protein Interactions That Regulate Neurotransmitter Release from Retinal Ribbon Synapses

Protein-Protein Interactions That Regulate Neurotransmitter Release from Retinal Ribbon Synapses Photoreceptors and bipolar cells in the retina form specialized chemical synapses called ribbon synapses. This type of synapse differs physiologically from “conventional” chemical synapses. While “conventional” synapses exocytose neurotransmitter-filled vesicles in an all-or-none fashion in response to an action potential, a retinal ribbon synapse can release neurotransmitter tonically (sustained) in response to graded changes in membrane potential or phasically (transient) in response to a large change in membrane potential. Synaptic vesicle exocytosis is a tightly controlled process involving many protein-protein interactions. Therefore, it is likely that the dissimilarity in the release properties of retinal ribbon synapses and conventional synapses is the result of molecular differences between the two synapse types. Consistent with this idea, previous studies have demonstrated that ribbon synapses in the retina do not contain the t-SNARE (target-soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) syntaxin 1A that is found in conventional synapses of the nervous system. In contrast, ribbon synapses of the mammalian retina contain the related isoform, syntaxin 3B. Given that SNARE proteins play an important role in neurotransmitter release in conventional synapses, the purpose of this study was to characterize syntaxin 3B in order to elucidate what role this protein plays in neurotransmitter release from retinal ribbon synapses. Using molecular and biochemical techniques, it was demonstrated that syntaxin 3B is a binding partner of several presynaptic proteins that play a important role in synaptic vesicle exocytosis from retinal ribbon synapses and it is an evolutionarily conserved protein.

Sustained attention in children with two etiologies of early hydrocephalus.

Several studies have shown that children with spina bifida meningomyelocele (SBM) and hydrocephalus have attention problems on parent ratings and difficulties in stimulus orienting associated with a posterior brain attention system. Less is known about response control and inhibition associated with an anterior brain attention system. Using the Gordon Vigilance Task (Gordon, 1983), we studied error rate, reaction time, and performance over time for sustained attention, a key anterior attention function, in 101 children with SBM, 17 with aqueductal stenosis (AS; another condition involving congenital hydrocephalus), and 40 typically developing controls (NC). In SBM, we investigated the relation between cognitive attention and parent ratings of inattention and hyperactivity and explored the impact of medical variables. Children with SBM did not differ from AS or NC groups on measures of sustained attention, but they committed more errors and responded more slowly. Approximately one-third of the SBM group had attention symptoms, although parent attention ratings were not associated with task performance. Hydrocephalus does not account for the attention profile of children with SBM, which also reflects the distinctive brain dysmorphologies associated with this condition.

Spinal cord injury causes sustained disruption of the blood-testis barrier in the rat.

There is a high incidence of infertility in males following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Quality of semen is frequently poor in these patients, but the pathophysiological mechanism(s) causing this are not known. Blood-testis barrier (BTB) integrity following SCI has not previously been examined. The objective of this study was to characterize the effects of spinal contusion injury on the BTB in the rat. 63 adult, male Sprague Dawley rats received SCI (n = 28), laminectomy only (n = 7) or served as uninjured, age-matched controls (n = 28). Using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), BTB permeability to the vascular contrast agent gadopentate dimeglumine (Gd) was assessed at either 72 hours-, or 10 months post-SCI. DCE-MRI data revealed that BTB permeability to Gd was greater than controls at both 72 h and 10 mo post-SCI. Histological evaluation of testis tissue showed increased BTB permeability to immunoglobulin G at both 72 hours- and 10 months post-SCI, compared to age-matched sham-operated and uninjured controls. Tight junctional integrity within the seminiferous epithelium was assessed; at 72 hours post-SCI, decreased expression of the tight junction protein occludin was observed. Presence of inflammation in the testes was also examined. High expression of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1 beta was detected in testis tissue. CD68(+) immune cell infiltrate and mast cells were also detected within the seminiferous epithelium of both acute and chronic SCI groups but not in controls. In addition, extensive germ cell apoptosis was observed at 72 h post-SCI. Based on these results, we conclude that SCI is followed by compromised BTB integrity by as early as 72 hours post-injury in rats and is accompanied by a substantial immune response within the testis. Furthermore, our results indicate that the BTB remains compromised and testis immune cell infiltration persists for months after the initial injury.

The role of STAT3 in the emergency neutrophil response

Neutrophils are an essential component of innate immunity, serving to provide an immediate response to microbial invasion. In response to emergency situations such as an infection, serum levels of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are induced, causing a boost in neutrophil production and a rapid mobilization of bone marrow neutrophils to the blood, where they can circulate to clear foreign pathogens. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is a principal downstream signaling intermediate of the G-CSF receptor. Mice null for STAT3 are embryonic lethal; therefore, to examine the role that STAT3 has in granulocytic development and function in vivo, we utilized a conditional knockout mouse that deletes functional STAT3 in the hematopoietic system (referred to herein as STAT3-deficient). Using this model, we show that STAT3 is required for G-CSF-induced expansion of granulocytic progenitor cells within the bone marrow and for acute G-CSF-dependent neutrophil mobilization into the blood. Thus, STAT3 has a critical role in the immediate G-CSF-response in vivo. Sustained G-CSF exposure causes skewed granulocytic production and mobilization in STAT3-deficient mice, suggesting an atypical granulocytic developmental pathway. To determine if STAT3-deficient neutrophils were functional, we examined neutrophil chemotaxis, since neutrophil function relies on proper chemoattractant-induced migration to infected tissue sites. STAT3-deficient neutrophils have impaired chemotaxis in response to the potent neutrophil chemoattractants MIP-2 and KC, both ligands for the chemokine receptor CXCR2. Additionally, STAT3-deficient mice have a defect in NIIP-2-induced acute neutrophil mobilization in vivo. Chemotaxis in response to fMLP and SDF-1, which utilize distinct seven-transmembrane chemokine receptors, was similar between wild type and STAT3-deficient neutrophils, suggesting that STAT3 specifically regulates CXCR2-mediated migration. MIP-2-induced activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK signaling cascade, which we show is required for MIP-2-dependent neutrophil chemotaxis, was impaired in STAT3-deficient neutrophils. Interestingly, acute G-CSF administration induced CXCR2 expression and Raf/MEK/ERK activation in neutrophils from wild type mice, whereas these responses were abrogated in neutrophils from STAT3-deficient mice. Thus, STAT3 regulation of CXCR2 functions may also contribute to STAT3's control of the acute G-CSF mobilization response. These combined results place STAT3 as a critical intermediate in neutrophil migration and G-CSF-induced neutrophil production responses required for emergency granulopoiesis. ^

Secondary left ventricular ejection fraction response to beta blocker therapy in heart failure patients

Chronic β-blocker treatment improves survival and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with systolic heart failure (HF). Data on whether the improvement in LVEF after β-blocker therapy is sustained for a long term or whether there is a loss in LVEF after an initial gain is not known. Our study sought to determine the prevalence and prognostic role of secondary decline in LVEF in chronic systolic HF patients on β-blocker therapy and characterize these patients. Retrospective chart review of HF hospitalizations fulfilling Framingham Criteria was performed at the MEDVAMC between April 2000 and June 2006. Follow up vital status and recurrent hospitalizations were ascertained until May 2010. Three groups of patients were identified based on LVEF response to beta blockers; group A with secondary decline in LVEF following an initial increase, group B with progressive increase in LVEF and group C with progressive decline in LVEF. Covariate adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine differences in heart failure re-hospitalizations and all cause mortality between the groups. Twenty five percent (n=27) of patients had a secondary decline in LVEF following an initial gain. The baseline, peak and final LVEF in this group were 27.6±12%, 40.1±14% and 27.4±13% respectively. The mean nadir LVEF after decline was 27.4±13% and this decline occurred at a mean interval of 2.8±1.9 years from the day of beta blocker initiation. These patients were older, more likely to be whites, had advanced heart failure (NYHA class III/IV) more due to a non ischemic etiology compared to groups B & C. They were also more likely to be treated with metoprolol (p=0.03) compared to the other two groups. No significant differences were observed in combined risk of all cause mortality and HF re-hospitalization [hazard ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.38, p=0.42]. No significant difference was observed in survival estimates between the groups. In conclusion, a late decline in LVEF does occur in a significant proportion of heart failure patients treated with beta blockers, more so in patients treated with metoprolol.^