2 resultados para stream restoration
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
Imatinib mesylate (IM) and Interferon-alfa (IFN-α) are currently the two most efficacious therapies for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). IFN-α induces durable complete cytogentic remission (CCR) in about 25% of CML patients whereas IM, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, induces CCR in 50% of patients who are resistant to IFN-α and in 75% of patients in early chronic phase of CML. However, the detection of minimal residual disease without clinical relapse suggests that host immune surveillance plays a very important role in controlling the progression of disease. ^ T lymphocytes and dendritic cells (DC) are the two most crucial players in the immune system. In my study, we focused on the effects of treatment with either IM or IFN-α on the functions of both DC and T cells, as exemplified by the ability of DC to present antigen to T cells and activated T cells to synthesize cytokines. Our studies show that cytokine production by T cells activated through the T-cell receptor (TCR) was significantly lower in CML patients treated with IM, but not with IFN-α, when compared with activated T cells of control subjects. Suppression of T cell function by IM albeit transient and reversible, was through the downregulation of the phosphorylation of Zap-70, Lck, and LAT. ^ Our data also show that the myeloid DC (DC1) and the plasmacytoid DC (DC2) are lower in chronic phase CML. Whereas neither therapy restored the level of DC2 to normal levels, the number of DC1 was normalized by either therapy. However, only IFN-α, and not IM, restored DC2 function to normal, as exemplified by the production of IFN-α in response to exposure to live influenza virus. Moreover, in vitro differentiation and maturation of DC1 from monocyte precursors in patients receiving either therapy was not normal and was reflected in their ability to present antigen to autologous T cells. ^ In summary, we report that there are differences in immune responses of CML patients treated with IM or IFN-α that may be the result of long-term effects on the host immune system by the individual therapy. ^
Resumo:
Over 80% of p53 mutations found in human cancers are p53 missense mutations. Recent studies have shown that p53 restoration leads to tumor regression in mice with p53 deletions, but the therapeutic efficacy of p53 restoration in tumors containing p53 missense mutations has not been evaluated. Since p53 mutant such as p53R172H has gain-of-function activities and dominant-negative effect that repress wild type p53, the activity of restored wild-type p53 might be compromised by the mutant p53 in tumors. We hypothesized that p53 restoration in tumors with the p53R172H mutation may be less therapeutically effective as p53 restoration in tumors null for p53. I tested this hypothesis by comparison of the therapeutic outcomes of p53 restoration in mice with spontaneous tumors that either lacked p53 or contained the p53R172H mutation. While p53 restoration causes tumor regression in mice lacking p53, the same p53 restoration halts tumor progression in mice with the p53R172H mutation. This phenotypic difference suggests a dominant-negative activity of the mutant p53. Moreover, I showed that the mutant p53 only inhibits part of the activity of the restored wild-type p53 and that the remaining wild-type activity still causes a delay in tumor progression. We conclude that p53 restoration has therapeutic potential in p53R172H tumors via suppression of tumor progression. This knowledge is of critical importance for p53 targeted cancer therapy because many patients with cancers harbor p53 missense mutations rather p53-null mutations. Since p53R172H mutation represents one of the most frequent and potent p53 missense mutations observed in human cancers, the current findings implicates that p53 restoration may be therapeutically important not only in human cancers characterized by loss of p53 alleles but also in those in which p53 missense mutations play an important pathogenetic role. ^