Functional studies of the homeobox gene {\it Goosecoid\/} during mouse embryogenesis

A fundamental question in developmental biology is to understand the mechanisms that govern the development of an adult individual from a single cell. Goosecoid (Gsc) is an evolutionarily conserved homeobox gene that has been cloned in vertebrates and in Drosophila. In mice, Gsc is first expressed during gastrulation stages where it marks anterior structures of the embryo, this pattern of expression is conserved among vertebrates. Later, expression is observed during organogenesis of the head, limbs and the trunk. The conserved pattern of expression of Gsc during gastrulation and gain of function experiments in Xenopus suggested a function for Gsc in the development of anterior structures in vertebrates. Also, its expression pattern in mouse suggested a role in morphogenesis of the head, limbs and trunk. To determine the functional requirement of Gsc in mice a loss of function mutation was generated by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells and mice mutant for Gsc were generated.^ Gsc-null mice survived to birth but died hours after delivery. Phenotypic analysis revealed craniofacial and rib cage abnormalities that correlated with the second phase of Gsc expression in the head and trunk but no anomalies were found that correlated with its pattern of expression during gastrulation or limb development.^ To determine the mode of action of Gsc during craniofacial development aggregation chimeras were generated between Gsc-null and wild-type embryos. Chimeras were generated by the aggregation of cleavage stage embryos, taking advantage of two different Gsc-null alleles generated during gene targeting. Chimeras demonstrated a cell-autonomous function for Gsc during craniofacial development and a requirement for Gsc function in cartilage and mesenchymal tissues.^ Thus, during embryogenesis in mice, Gsc is not an essential component of gastrulation as had been suggested in previous experiments. Gsc is required for craniofacial development where it acts cell autonomously in cartilage and mesenchymal tissues. Gsc is also required for proper development of the rib cage but it is dispensable for limb development in mice. ^

CONFORMATIONAL DYNAMICS OF K-RAS AND H-RAS PROTEINS: IS THERE FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICITY AT THE CATALYTIC DOMAIN?

Ras proteins serve as crucial signaling modulators in cell proliferation through their ability to hydrolyze GTP and exist in a GTP “on” state and GTP “off” state. There are three different human Ras isoforms: H-ras, N-ras and K-ras (4A and 4B). Although their sequence identity is very high at the catalytic domain, these isoforms differ in their ability to activate different effectors and hence different signaling pathways. Much of the previous work on this topic has attributed this difference to the hyper variable region of Ras proteins, which contains most of the sequence variance among the isoforms and encodes specificity for differential distribution in the membrane. However, we hypothesize that sequence variation on lobe II of Ras catalytic domain alters dynamics and leads to differential preference for different effectors or modulators. In this work, we used all atom molecular dynamics to analyze the dynamics in the catalytic domain of H-ras and K-ras. We have also analyzed the dynamics of a transforming mutant of H-ras and K-ras and further studied the dynamics of an effectorselective mutant of H-ras. Collectively we have determined that wild type K-ras is more dynamic than H-ras and that the structure of the effector binding loop more closely resembles that of the T35S Raf-selective mutant, possibly giving us a new view and insight into the v mode of effector specificity. Furthermore we have determined that specific mutations at the same location perturb the conformational equilibrium differently in H-ras and K-ras and that an enhanced oncogenic potential may arise from different structural perturbations for each point mutation of a specific isoform.