PHENOTYPIC ASSOCIATION OF GENE AMPLIFICATION WITH MULTIPLE DRUG RESISTANCE IN VINCRISTINE RESISTANT CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY CELLS

Resistance of tumors to pharmacologic agents poses a significant problem in the treatment of human malignancies. This study overviews the scope of clinical resistance and focuses upon current research attempts toward investigation of the phenomenon of multidrug resistance (MDR).^ The objective of this investigation was to determine whether gene amplification had a role in the development of the MDR phenotype in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) primarily selected for resistance to vincristine (VCR). A DNA fragment, previously shown to be amplified in two independently derived Chinese hamster cell lines exhibiting the MDR phenotype, was also amplified in VCR hamster lines. Sequences flanking this fragment were shown to contain coding information for a 4.3 kb transcript overproduced in VCR cells. These sequences were not enriched in double minute DNA preparations isolated from VCR cells. There was an approximately forty-fold increase in both the level of gene amplification and transcript overproduction in the VCR cell lines, independent of the level of primary resistance. This DNA amplification and overproduction of the 4.3 kb transcript was also demonstrated in CHO cells independently selected for resistance to Adriamycin and vinblastine.^ All the DNA sequences of two hamster cDNA clones containing 785 and 932 base pair inserts showed direct homology to the published mouse mdr sequences (about 90%). This sequence conservation held for only portions of the gene when the human mdr1 sequences were compared with those from either the mouse or hamster.^ Somatic cell hybrids, constructed between VCR CHO cells and sensitive murine cells, were used to determine whether there was a functional relationship between the chromosome bearing the amplified sequences and the MDR phenotype. Concordant segregation between vincristine resistance, the MDR phenotype, the presence of MDR-associated amplified sequences, overexpression of the mRNA encoded by these sequences, overexpression of the mRNA encoded by these sequences, and CHO chromosome Z1 was consistent with the hypothesis that there is an amplified gene on chromosome Z1 of the VCR CHO cells which is responsible for MDR in these cells. ^

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance: Differences between natural and acquired adriamycin -resistant human colon carcinoma cells

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance (MDR) were studied in two independent MDR sublines (AdR1.2 and SRA1.2) derived from the established human colon carcinoma cell line LoVo. AdR1.2 was developed by long-term continuous exposure of the cells to adriamycin (AdR) in stepwise increments of concentration, while SRA1.2 was selected by repetitive pulse treatments with AdR at a single concentration. In this dissertation, the hypothesis that the mechanism of drug resistance in SRA1.2 is different than that in AdR1.2 is tested. While SRA1.2 demonstrated similar biological characteristics when compared to the parental LoVo, AdR1.2 exhibited remarkable alterations in biological properties. The resistance phenotype of AdR1.2 was reversible when the cells were grown in the drug-free medium whereas SRA1.2 maintained its resistance for at least 10 months under similar conditions. Km and Vmax of carrier-mediated facilitated diffusion AdR transport were similar among the three lines. However, both resistant sublines exhibited an energy-dependent drug efflux. AdR1.2 appeared to possess an activated efflux pump, and a decreased nucleus-binding of AdR, whereas SRA1.2 showed merely a lower affinity in binding of AdR to the nuclei. Southern blot analysis showed no amplification of the MDR1 gene in either of the two resistant subclones. However, Western blot analysis using the C219 monoclonal antibody against P170 glycoprotein detected a Mr 150-kDa plasma protein (P150) in AdR1.2 but not in SRA1.2 or in the parental LoVo. In vitro phosphorylation studies revealed that P150 was a phosphoprotein; its phosphorylation was Mg$\sp{2+}$-dependent and could be enhanced by verapamil, an agent capable of increasing intracellular AdR accumulation in AdR1.2 cells. The phosphorylation studies also revealed elevated phosphorylation of a Mr 66-kDa plasma membrane protein that was detectable in the AdR1.2 revertant and in AdR1.2 when verapamil was present, suggesting that hyperphosphorylation of the Mr 66-kDa protein may be related to the reversal of MDR. SDS-PAGE of the plasma membrane protein demonstrated overproduction of a Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa protein was not immunoreactive with C219, but its absence in the AdR1.2 revertant and the parental LoVo suggests that it is an MDR-related plasma membrane protein. In conclusion, the results from this study support the author's hypothesis that the mechanisms responsible for "Acquired" and "Natural" MDR are not identical. ^