2 resultados para predicted packet padding
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
Attention has recently been drawn to Enterococcus faecium because of an increasing number of nosocomial infections caused by this species and its resistance to multiple antibacterial agents. However, relatively little is known about the pathogenic determinants of this organism. We have previously identified a cell-wall-anchored collagen adhesin, Acm, produced by some isolates of E. faecium, and a secreted antigen, SagA, exhibiting broad-spectrum binding to extracellular matrix proteins. Here, we analysed the draft genome of strain TX0016 for potential microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs). Genome-based bioinformatics identified 22 predicted cell-wall-anchored E. faecium surface proteins (Fms), of which 15 (including Acm) had characteristics typical of MSCRAMMs, including predicted folding into a modular architecture with multiple immunoglobulin-like domains. Functional characterization of one [Fms10; redesignated second collagen adhesin of E. faecium (Scm)] revealed that recombinant Scm(65) (A- and B-domains) and Scm(36) (A-domain) bound to collagen type V efficiently in a concentration-dependent manner, bound considerably less to collagen type I and fibrinogen, and differed from Acm in their binding specificities to collagen types IV and V. Results from far-UV circular dichroism measurements of recombinant Scm(36) and of Acm(37) indicated that these proteins were rich in beta-sheets, supporting our folding predictions. Whole-cell ELISA and FACS analyses unambiguously demonstrated surface expression of Scm in most E. faecium isolates. Strikingly, 11 of the 15 predicted MSCRAMMs clustered in four loci, each with a class C sortase gene; nine of these showed similarity to Enterococcus faecalis Ebp pilus subunits and also contained motifs essential for pilus assembly. Antibodies against one of the predicted major pilus proteins, Fms9 (redesignated EbpC(fm)), detected a 'ladder' pattern of high-molecular-mass protein bands in a Western blot analysis of cell surface extracts from E. faecium, suggesting that EbpC(fm) is polymerized into a pilus structure. Further analysis of the transcripts of the corresponding gene cluster indicated that fms1 (ebpA(fm)), fms5 (ebpB(fm)) and ebpC(fm) are co-transcribed, a result consistent with those for pilus-encoding gene clusters of other Gram-positive bacteria. All 15 genes occurred frequently in 30 clinically derived diverse E. faecium isolates tested. The common occurrence of MSCRAMM- and pilus-encoding genes and the presence of a second collagen-binding protein may have important implications for our understanding of this emerging pathogen.
VERIFICATION OF DNA PREDICTED PROTEIN SEQUENCES BY ENZYME HYDROLYSIS AND MASS SPECTROMETRIC ANALYSIS
Resumo:
The focus of this thesis lies in the development of a sensitive method for the analysis of protein primary structure which can be easily used to confirm the DNA sequence of a protein's gene and determine the modifications which are made after translation. This technique involves the use of dipeptidyl aminopeptidase (DAP) and dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase (DCP) to hydrolyze the protein and the mass spectrometric analysis of the dipeptide products.^ Dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase was purified from human lung tissue and characterized with respect to its proteolytic activity. The results showed that the enzyme has a relatively unrestricted specificity, making it useful for the analysis of the C-terminal of proteins. Most of the dipeptide products were identified using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). In order to analyze the peptides not hydrolyzed by DCP and DAP, as well as the dipeptides not identified by GC/MS, a FAB ion source was installed on a quadrupole mass spectrometer and its performance evaluated with a variety of compounds.^ Using these techniques, the sequences of the N-terminal and C-terminal regions and seven fragments of bacteriophage P22 tail protein have been verified. All of the dipeptides identified in these analysis were in the same DNA reading frame, thus ruling out the possibility of a single base being inserted or deleted from the DNA sequence. The verification of small sequences throughout the protein sequence also indicates that no large portions of the protein have been removed after translation. ^