New implications of E1A gene therapy in breast and ovarian cancer

A variety of human cancers overexpress the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene. Among patients with breast and ovarian cancers this HER-2/ neu overexpression indicates an unfavorable prognosis, with a shorter overall survival duration and a lower response rate to chemotherapeutic agents. Downregulation of HER-2/neu gene expression in cancer cells through attenuation of HER-2/neu promoter activity is, therefore, an attractive strategy for reversing the transformation phenotype and thus the chemoresistance induced by HER-2/neu overexpression. ^ A viral transcriptional regulator, the adenovirus type 5 E1A (early region 1A) that can repress the HER-2/neu promoter, had been identified in the laboratory of Dr. Mien-Chie Hung. Following the identification of the E1A gene, a series of studies revealed that repression of HER-2/neu by the E1A gene which can act therapeutically as a tumor suppressor gene for HER-2/ neu-overexpressing cancers. ^ The results of these preclinical studies became the basis for a phase I trial for E1A gene therapy among patients with HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast and ovarian cancer. In this dissertation, three primary questions concerned with new implications of E1A gene therapy are addressed: First, could E1A gene therapy be incorporated with conventional chemotherapy? Second, could the E1A gene be delivered systemically to exert an anti-tumor effect? And third, what is the activity of the E1A gene in low-HER-2/neu-expressing cancer cells? ^ With regard to the first question, the studies reported in this dissertation have shown that the sensitivity of HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast and ovarian cancer to paclitaxel is in fact enhanced by the downregulation of HER-2/neu overexpression by E1A. With regard to the second question, studies have shown that the E1A gene can exert anti-tumor activity by i.v. injection of the E1A gene complexed with the novel cationic liposome/protamine sulfate/DNA type I (LPDI). And with regard to the third question, the studies of low-HER-2/ neu-expressing breast and ovarian cancers reported here have shown that the E1A gene does in fact suppress metastatic capability. It did not, however, suppress the tumorigenicity. ^ Three conclusions can be drawn from the experimental findings reported in this dissertation. Combining paclitaxel with E1A gene therapy may expand the implications of the gene therapy in the future phase II clinical trial. Anti-tumor activity at a distant site may be achieved with the i.v. injection of the E1A gene. Lastly when administered therapeutically the anti-metastatic effect of the E1A gene in low-HER-2/neu-expressing breast cancer cells may prevent metastasis in primary breast cancer. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)^

Bortezomib modulates TRAIL sensitivity in human bladder and prostate cancer

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (Apo2L/TRAIL) is a member of the TNF superfamily of cytokines that can induce cell death through engagement of cognate death receptors. Unlike other death receptor ligands, it selectively kills tumor cells while sparing normal cells. Preclinical studies in non-human primates have generated much enthusiasm regarding its therapeutic potential. However, many human cancer cell lines exhibit significant resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, and the molecular mechanisms underling this are controversial. Possible explanations are typically cell-type dependent, but include alterations of receptor expression, enhancement of pro-apoptotic intracellular signaling molecules, and reductions in anti-apoptotic proteins. We show here that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Velcade, PS-341) produces synergistic apoptosis in both bladder and prostate cancer cell lines within 4-6 hours when co-treated with recombinant human TRAIL which is associated with accumulation of p21 and cdk1/2 inhibition. Our data suggest that bortezomib's mechanism of action involves a p21-dependent enhancement of caspase maturation. Furthermore, we found enhanced tumor cell death in in vivo models using athymic nude mice. This is associated with increases in caspase-8 and caspase-3 cleavage as well as significant reductions in microvessel density (MVD) and proliferation. Although TRAIL alone had less of an effect, its biological significance as a single agent requires further investigations. Toxicity studies reveal that the combination of bortezomib and rhTRAIL has fatal consequences that can be circumvented by altering treatment schedules. Based on our findings, we conclude that this strategy has significant therapeutic potential as an anti-cancer agent. ^

The effects of proteasome inhibition on angiogenesis and autophagy in human prostate cancer cells

The proteasome degrades approximately 80% of intracellular proteins to maintain homeostasis. Proteasome inhibition is a validated therapeutic strategy, and currently, proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is FDA approved for the treatment of MM and MCL. Specific pathways affected by proteasome inhibition have been identified, but mechanisms of the anti-tumor effects of proteasome inhibition are not fully characterized and cancer cells display marked heterogeneity in terms of their sensitivity to proteasome inhibitor induced cell death. ^ The antitumor effects of proteasome inhibition involve suppression of tumor angiogenesis and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression, but the mechanisms involved have not been clarified. In this dissertation I investigated the mechanisms underlying the effects of two proteasome inhibitors, bortezomib and NPI-0052, on VEGF expression in human prostate cancer cells. I found that proteasome inhibitors selectively downregulated hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1α) protein and its transcriptional activity to inhibit VEGF expression. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that proteasome inhibitors mediate the induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and that downregulation of HIF-1α is caused by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) phosphorylation and translation repression. Importantly, I showed that proteasome inhibitors activated the UPR in some cells but not in others. My observation may have implications for the design of combination regimens that are based on exploiting proteasome inhibitor-induced ER stress.^ Although proteasome inhibitors have shown modest activity on prostate cancer, there is general consensus that no single agent is likely to have significant activity in prostate cancer. In the second part of this dissertation I attempted to exploit the effects of proteasome inhibition on the UPR to design a combination therapy that would enhance cancer cell death. Autophagy is a lysosome dependent degradation pathway that functions to eliminate long-lived protein and subcellular structures. Targeting autophagy has been shown to inhibit tumors in preclinical studies. I found that inhibition of autophagy with chloroquine or 3-methyladenine enhanced proteasome inhibitor induced cell death and the effects were associated with increased intracellular stress as marked by aggresome formation. Multiple cancers appear to be resistant to proteasome inhibition treatment alone. The implications of synergy for the combined inhibition of autophagy and the proteasome would likely apply to other cancers aside from prostate cancer. ^

Role of activation of the protein tyrosine kinase, Src, in colorectal cancer chemoresistance

Advances in therapy for colorectal cancer have been hampered by development of resistance to chemotherapy. The Src family of protein tyrosine kinases has been associated with colorectal cancer development and progression. Activation of the prototypic member of the family, Src, occurs in advanced colorectal cancer and is associated with a worse outcome. This work tests the hypotheses that Src activation contributes to chemoresistance in some colon tumors and that this resistance can be overcome by use of Src inhibitors. The aims of the proposal were to (1) determine if constitutive Src activation is sufficient to induce oxaliplatin resistance; (2) evaluate the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the activation of Src after oxaliplatin treatment; (3) determine the frequency of Src activation in liver metastases after oxaliplatin treatment; and (4) evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacodynamics of the combination of dasatinib with oxaliplatin-based therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ^ Using a panel of colon cancer cell lines and murine models, I demonstrate that administration of oxaliplatin, a commonly utilized chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, results in an increased activation of Src. The activation occurs acutely in some, but not all, colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Cell lines selected for oxaliplatin resistance are further increased in Src activity. Treatment of cell lines with dasatinib, a non-selective pharmacologic inhibitor of the Src family kinases synergistically killed some, but not all cell lines. Cell lines with the highest acute activation of Src after oxaliplatin administration were the most sensitive to the combination therapy. Previous work demonstrated that siRNA to Src increased sensitivity to oxaliplatin, suggesting that the effects of dasatinib are primarily due to its ability to inhibit Src in these cell lines. ^ To examine the mechanism underlying these results, I examined the effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as previous studies have demonstrated that platinum chemotherapeutics result in intracellular oxidative stress. I demonstrated that oxaliplatin-induced reactive oxygen species were higher in the cell lines with Src activation, relative to those in which Src was not activated. This oxaliplatin-induced Src activation was blocked by the administration of anti-oxidants, thereby demonstrating that synergistic killing between dasatinib and oxaliplatin was associated with the ability of the latter to generate ROS. ^ In a murine model of colorectal cancer metastasis to the liver, the combination of dasatinib and oxaliplatin was more effective in reducing tumor volume than either agent alone. However, when oxaliplatin resistant cell lines were treated with a combination of oxaliplatin and AZD0530, an inhibitor in the clinic with increased specificity for Src, no additional benefit was seen, although Src was activated by oxaliplatin and Src substrates were inhibited. The indolent growth of oxaliplatin-resistant cells, unlike the growth of oxaliplatin resistant tumors in patients, precludes definitive interpretation of these results. ^ To further explore Src activation in patients with oxaliplatin exposure and resistance, an immunohistochemistry analysis of tumor tissue from resected liver metastases of colorectal cancer was performed. Utilizing a tissue microarray, staining for phosphorylated Src and FAK demonstrated strong staining of tumor relative to stromal and normal liver. In patients recently exposed to oxaliplatin, there was increased FAK activation, supporting the clinical relevance of the prior preclinical studies. ^ To pursue the potential clinical benefit of the combination of Src inhibition with oxaliplatin, a phase IB clinical trial was completed. Thirty patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with a combination of 5-FU, oxaliplatin, an epidermal-growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, and dasatinib. The recommended phase II dose of dasatinib was established, and toxicities were quantified. Pharmacodynamic studies demonstrated increased phosphorylation of the Src substrate paxillin after dasatinib therapy. Tumor biopsies were obtained and Src expression levels were quantitated. Clinical benefit was seen with the combination, including a response rate of 20% and disease control rate of 56%, prompting a larger clinical study. ^ In summary, although Src is constitutively activated in metastatic colorectal cancer, administration of oxaliplatin chemotherapy can further increase its activity, through a reactive oxygen species dependent manner. Inhibition of Src in combination with oxaliplatin provides additional benefit in vitro, in preclinical animal models, and in the clinic. Further study of Src inhibition in the clinic and identification of predictive biomarkers of response will be required to further advance this promising therapeutic target. ^