NOVEL MECHANISMS OF ANTIGEN PROCESSING THAT ENHANCE BCG VACCINE EFFICACY

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis, is the most lethal single infectious agent afflicting man today causing 2 million deaths per year. The World Health Organization recommends a vaccine as the best option to prevent this disease. The current vaccine, BCG, has a variable efficacy and does not protect adults. It is known that BCG vaccine becomes sequestered in special phagosome compartments of macrophages that do not fuse with lysosomes. Since lysosome fusion is necessary for peptide production and T cell priming leading to protective TH1 immunity, we hypothesized that vaccine efficacy is reduced and occurs perhaps due to non-lysosome dependent mechanisms. We therefore proposed an in depth analysis of phagosome environment, and its proteome to unravel mechanisms of antigen processing and presentation. We initially discovered that three mechanisms of pH regulation including vacuolar proton ATPase, phagocyte oxidase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) secretion from BCG vaccine affect antigen processing within phagosomes. These studies led to the discovery that a mutant of BCG vaccine which lacked SOD was a better vaccine. Subsequently, the proteomic analysis of vaccine phagosomes led to the discovery of novel protease (γ-secretase) enriched on BCG vaccine phagosomes. We then demonstrated that these proteases generated a peptide from the BCG vaccine which was presented through the MHC-II pathway to T cells and induced a TH1 response. The specificity of antigen production from γ-secretase was confirmed through siRNA knockdown of the components of the protease namely, nicastrin, presenilin and APH, which led to a decrease in antigen presentation. We therefore conclude that, even though BCG phagosomes are sequestered and do not fuse with lysosomes to generate peptide antigens, there are complex and novel in situ mechanisms within phagosomes that are capable of generating an immune response. We conclude that TH1 immunity to BCG vaccine arises mostly due to non-lysosome dependent immune mechanisms of macrophages and dendritic cells.

Regulation of the gastrin-releasing peptide/bombesin receptor

Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) and other bombesin-like peptides stimulate hormone secretion and cell proliferation by binding to specific G-protein-coupled receptors. Three studies were performed to identify potential mechanisms involved in GRP/bombesin receptor regulation.^ Although bombesin receptors are localized throughout the gastrointestinal tract, few gastrointestinal cell lines are available to study bombesin action. In the first study, the binding and function of bombesin receptors in the human HuTu-80 duodenal cancer cell line were characterized. ($\sp{125}$I-Tyr$\sp4$) bombesin bound with high affinity to a GRP-preferring receptor. Bombesin treatment increased IP$\sb3$ production, but had no effect on cell proliferation. Similar processing of ($\sp{125}$I-Tyr$\sp4$) bombesin and of GRP-receptors was observed in HuTu-80 cells and Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, a cell line which mitogenically responds to bombesin. Therefore, the lack of a bombesin mitogenic effect in HuTu-80 cells is not due to unusual processing of ($\sp{125}$I-Tyr$\sp4$) bombesin or rapid GRP-receptor down-regulation.^ In the second study, a bombesin antagonist was developed to study the processing and regulatory events after antagonist binding. As previously shown, receptor bound agonist, ($\sp{125}$I-Tyr$\sp4$) bombesin, was rapidly internalized and degraded in chloroquine-sensitive compartments. Interestingly, receptor-bound antagonist, ($\sp{125}$I-D-Tyr$\sp6$) bombesin(6-13)PA was not internalized, but degraded at the cell-surface. In contrast to bombesin, (D-Tyr$\sp6$) bombesin(6-13)PA treatment did not cause receptor internalization. Together these results demonstrate that receptor regulation and receptor-mediated processing of antagonist is different from that of agonist.^ Bombesin receptors undergo acute desensitization. By analogy to other G-protein-coupled receptors, a potential desensitization mechanism may involve receptor phosphorylation. In the final study, $\sp{32}$P-labelled Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts and CHO-mBR1 cells were treated with bombesin and the GRP-receptor was immunoprecipitated. In both cell lines, bombesin treatment markedly stimulated GRP-receptor phosphorylation. Furthermore, bombesin-stimulated GRP-receptor phosphorylation occurred within the same time period as bombesin-stimulated desensitization, demonstrating that these two processes are correlated.^ In conclusion, these studies of GRP-receptor regulation further our understanding of bombesin action and provide insight into G-protein-coupled receptor regulation in general. ^