3 resultados para other requirements
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
The corepressor complex Tup1-Ssn6 regulates many classes of genes in yeast including cell type specific, glucose repressible, and DNA damage inducible. Tup1 and Ssn6 are recruited to target promoters through their interactions with specific DNA binding proteins such as α2, Mig1, and Crt1. Most promoters that are repressed by this corepressor complex exhibit a high degree of nucleosomal organization. This chromatin domain occludes transcription factor access to the promoter element resulting in gene repression. Previous work indicated that Tup1 interacts with underacetylated isoforms of H3 and H4, and that mutation of these histones synergistically compromises repression. These studies predict that Tup1-hypoacetyalted histone interaction is important to the repression mechanism, and in vivo hyperacetylation might compromise the corepressors ability to repress target genes. ^ One way to alter histone acetylation levels in vivo is to alter the balance between histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases. To date five histone deacetylases (HDACs) have been identified in yeast Rpd3, Hos1, Hos2, Hos3 and Hda1. Deletion of single or double HDAC genes had little to no effect on Tup1-Ssn6 repression, but simultaneous deletion of three specific activities Rpd3, Hos1, and Hos2 abolished repression in vivo. Promoter regions of Tup1-Ssn6 target genes in these triple deacetylase mutant cells are dramatically hyperacetylated in both H3 and H4. Examination of bulk histone acetylation levels showed that this specific HDAC triple mutant combination (rpd3 hos1 hos2) caused a dramatic and concomitant hyperacetylation of both H3 and H4. The loss of repression in the rpd3 hos1 hos2 cells, but not in other mutants, is consistent with previous observations, which indicate that histones provide redundant functions in the repression mechanism and that high levels of acetylation are required to prevent Tup1 binding. Investigation into a potential direct interaction between the Tup1-Ssn6 corepressor complex and one or more HDAC activities showed that both Rpd3 and Hos2 interact with the corepressor complex in vivo. These findings indicate that Tup1-Ssn6 repression involves the recruitment of histone deacetylase activities to target promoters, where they locally deacetylate histone residues promoting Tup1-histone tail interaction to initiate and/or maintain the repressed state. ^
Resumo:
Formation of the FtsZ ring (Z ring) in Escherichia coli is the first step in assembly of the divisome, a molecular machine composed of 14 known proteins which are all required for cell division. Although the biochemical functions of most divisome proteins are unknown, several of these have overlapping roles in ensuring that the Z ring assembles at the cytoplasmic membrane and is active. ^ We identified a single amino acid change in FtsA, R286W, renamed FtsA*, that completely bypasses the requirement for ZipA in cell division. This and other data suggest that FtsA* is a hyperactive form of FtsA that can replace the multiple functions normally assumed by ZipA, which include stabilization of Z rings, recruitment of downstream cell division proteins, and anchoring the Z ring to the membrane. This is the first example of complete functional replacement of an essential prokaryotic cell division protein by another. ^ Cells expressing ftsA* with a complete deletion of ftsK are viable and divide, although many of these ftsK null cells formed multiseptate chains, suggesting a role in cell separation for FtsK. In addition, strains expressing extra ftsAZ, ftsQ, ftsB, zipA or ftsN, were also able to survive and divide in the absence of ftsK. The cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of FtsQ were sufficient to allow viability and septum formation to ftsK deleted strains. These findings suggest that FtsK is normally involved in stabilizing the divisome and shares functional overlap with other cell division proteins. ^ As well as permitting the removal of other divisome components, the presence of FtsA* in otherwise wild-type cells accelerated Z-ring assembly, which resulted in a significant decrease in the average length of cells. In support of its role in Z-ring stability, FtsA* suppressed the cell division inhibition caused by overexpressing FtsZ. FtsA* did not affect FtsZ turnover within the Z ring as measured by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Turnover of FtsA* in the ring was somewhat faster than wild-type FtsA. Yeast two-hybrid data suggest that FtsA* has an increased affinity for FtsZ relative to wild-type FtsA. These results indicate that FtsA* interacts with FtsZ more strongly, and its enhancement of Z ring assembly may explain why FtsA* can permit survival of cells lacking ZipA or FtsK.^
Resumo:
The study aim was to determine whether using automated side loader (ASL) trucks in higher proportions compared to other types of trucks for residential waste collection results in lower injury rates (from all causes). The primary hypothesis was that the risk of injury to workers was lower for those who work with ASL trucks than for workers who work with other types of trucks used in residential waste collection. To test this hypothesis, data were collected from one of the nation’s largest companies in the solid waste management industry. Different local operating units (i.e. facilities) in the company used different types of trucks to varying degrees, which created a special opportunity to examine refuse collection injuries and illnesses and the risk reduction potential of ASL trucks.^ The study design was ecological and analyzed end-of-year data provided by the company for calendar year 2007. During 2007, there were a total of 345 facilities which provided residential services. Each facility represented one observation.^ The dependent variable – injury and illness rate, was defined as a facility’s total case incidence rate (TCIR) recorded in accordance with federal OSHA requirements for the year 2007. The TCIR is the rate of total recordable injury and illness cases per 100 full-time workers. The independent variable, percent of ASL trucks, was calculated by dividing the number of ASL trucks by the total number of residential trucks at each facility.^ Multiple linear regression models were estimated for the impact of the percent of ASL trucks on TCIR per facility. Adjusted analyses included three covariates: median number of hours worked per week for residential workers; median number of months of work experience for residential workers; and median age of residential workers. All analyses were performed with the statistical software, Stata IC (version 11.0).^ The analyses included three approaches to classifying exposure, percent of ASL trucks. The first approach included two levels of exposure: (1) 0% and (2) >0 - <100%. The second approach included three levels of exposure: (1) 0%, (2) ≥ 1 - < 100%, and (3) 100%. The third approach included six levels of exposure to improve detection of a dose-response relationship: (1) 0%, (2) 1 to <25%, (3) 25 to <50%, (4) 50 to <75%, (5) 75 to <100%, and (6) 100%. None of the relationships between injury and illness rate and percent ASL trucks exposure levels was statistically significant (i.e., p<0.05), even after adjustment for all three covariates.^ In summary, the present study shows that there is some risk reduction impact of ASL trucks but not statistically significant. The covariates demonstrated a varied yet more modest impact on the injury and illness rate but again, none of the relationships between injury and illness rate and the covariates were statistically significant (i.e., p<0.05). However, as an ecological study, the present study also has the limitations inherent in such designs and warrants replication in an individual level cohort design. Any stronger conclusions are not suggested.^