ADAPTATION OF INTESTINAL MUSCLE IN THE RAT AFTER INTESTINAL BYPASS

After intestinal bypass, the mucosa of the in-continuity segment (ICS) of intestine undergoes adaptive hyperplasia which results in increased absorptive function per length of intestine. In the present study, 70% of the small intestine was bypassed in rats to determine if intestinal muscle also adapts after bypass. To determine the effect of bypass on intestinal transit, a poorly absorbed marker substance was introduced into the orad portion of the ICS or bypassed loop (BL). Significantly less marker (P < 0.05) was passed from the ICS into the colon in 50 minutes in fed rats at 14 days compared to at 3 days after bypass. In 150 minutes there was more marker in the colon of fed rats at 3 and 14 days but not at 35 days after bypass than in control. In the BL, transit was slowed significantly in fed rats at 3 and 35 days and in fasted rats at 3 days but not 35 days after bypass compared to control. The circular muscle from the BL and the distal but not proximal portion of the ICS developed significantly more carbachol-stimulated force in vitro at 35 but not 3 days after bypass compared to unoperated but not sham-operated controls. At 35 days after bypass, the muscle layers had a greater muscle wet weight and protein content compared to both unoperated and sham-operated control in both the proximal and distal portions of the ICS. Similarly, there was more muscle in histological sections of the BL and distal portion of the ICS at 35 days after bypass compared to either control. Nonetheless, at 35 days after bypass actomyosin content as a fraction of muscle weight or total protein content was not different from control. The results support the hypothesis that there was a functional adaptation, i.e. slowed transit in fed rats that allowed more time for absorption. Feeding caused slowed transit in the BL as well as the ICS. Other results suggest that an increased amount of functional muscle formed in the distal portion of the ICS after bypass. ^

MODULATION OF HOST INTESTINAL MYOELECTRIC ACTIVITY BY LOCAL ANAPHYLAXIS: A COMPONENT OF PROTECTIVE IMMUNITY TO AN ENTERIC PARASITE (TRICHINELLA SPIRALIS, EIMERIA NIESCHULZI, BOWEL MOTILITY)

The hypothesis tested was that rapid rejection of Trichinella spiralis infective larvae from immunized rats following a challenge infection is associated with a local anaphylactic reaction, and this response should be reflected in altered small intestinal motility. The objective was to determine if altered gut smooth muscle function accompanies worm rejection based on the assumption that anaphylaxis in vivo could be detected by changes in intestinal smooth muscle contractile activity (ie. an equivalent of the Schultz-Dale reaction or in vitro anaphylaxis). The aims were to (1) characterize motility changes by monitoring intestinal myoelectric activity in conscious rats during the enteric phase of T. spiralis infection in immunized hosts, (2) detect the onset and magnitude of myoelectric changes caused by challenge infection in immunized rats, (3) determine the parasite stimulus causing changes, and (4) determine the specificity of host response to stimulation. Electrical slow wave frequency, spiking activity, normal interdigestive migrating myoelectric complexes and abnormal migrating action potential complexes were measured. Changes in myoelectric parameters induced by larvae inoculated into the duodenum of immune hosts differed from those associated with primary infection with respect to time of onset, magnitude and duration. Myoelectric changes elicited by live larvae could not be reproduced by inoculation of hosts with dead larvae, larval excretory-secretory products, or by challenge with a heterologous parasite, Eimeria nieschulzi. These results indicate that (1) local anaphylaxis is a component of the initial response to T. spiralis in immune hosts, since the rapid onset of altered smooth muscle function parallels in time the expression of rapid rejection of infective larvae, and (2) an active mucosal penetration attempt by the worm is necessary to elicit this host response. These findings provide evidence that worm rejection is a consequence of, or sequel to, an immediate hypersensitivity reaction elicited when parasites attempt to invade the gut mucosa of immunized hosts. ^