Why does low dose morphine augment fentanyl analgesia?

Opioids dominate the field of pain management because of their ability to provide analgesia in many medical circumstances. However, side effects including respiratory depression, constipation, tolerance, physical dependence, and the risk of addiction limit their clinical utility. Fear of these side effects results in the under-treatment of acute pain. For many years, research has focused on ways to improve the therapeutic index (the ratio of desirable analgesic effects to undesirable side effects) of opioids. One strategy, combining opioid agonists that bind to different opioid receptor types, may prove successful.^ We discovered that subcutaneous co-administration of a moderately analgesic dose of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) selective agonist fentanyl (20μg/kg) with subanalgesic doses of the less MOR-specific agonist morphine (100ng/kg-100μg/kg), augmented acute fentanyl analgesia in rats. Parallel [35S]GTPγS binding studies using naïve rat substantia gelatinosa membrane treated with fentanyl (4μM) and morphine (1nM-1pM) demonstrated a 2-fold increase in total G-protein activation. This correlation between morphine-induced augmentation of fentanyl analgesia and G-protein activation led to our proposal that interactions between MORs and DORs underlie opioid-induced augmentation. We discovered that morphine-induced augmentation of fentanyl analgesia and G-protein activity was mediated by DORs. Adding the DOR-selective antagonist naltrindole (200ng/kg, 40nM) at doses that did not alter the analgesic or G-protein activation of fentanyl, blocked increases in analgesia and G-protein activation induced by fentanyl/morphine combinations. Equivalent doses of the MOR-selective antagonist cyprodime (20ng/kg, 4nM) did not block augmentation. Substitution of the DOR-selective agonist SNC80 for morphine yielded similar results, further supporting our conclusion that interactions between MORs and DORs are responsible for morphine-induced augmentation of fentanyl analgesia and G-protein activation. Confocal microscopy of rat substantia gelatinosa showed that changes in the rate of opioid receptor internalization did not account for these effects.^ In conclusion, fentanyl analgesia augmentation by subanalgesic morphine is mediated by increased G-protein activation resulting from functional interactions between MORs and DORs, not changes in MOR internalization. Additional animal and clinical studies are needed to determine whether side effect incidence changes following opioid co-administration. If side effect incidence decreases or remains unchanged, these findings could have important implications for clinical pain treatment. ^

Studies on behavioral regulations of morphine tolerance in rats

Opioids remain the drugs of choice in chronic pain treatment, but opioid tolerance, defined as a decrease in analgesic effect after prolonged or repeated use, dramatically limits their clinical utility. Opioid tolerance has classically been studied by implanting spinal catheters in animals for drug administration. This procedure has significant morbidity and mortality, as well as causing an inflammatory response which decreases the potency of opioid analgesia and possibly affects tolerance development. Therefore, we developed and validated a new method, intermittent lumbar puncture (Dautzenberg et al.), for the study of opioid analgesia and tolerance. Using this method, opioid tolerance was reliably induced without detectable morbidity. The dose of morphine needed to induce analgesia and tolerance using this method was about 100-fold lower than that required when using an intrathecal catheter. Only slight inflammation was found at the injection site, dissipated within seven mm. ^ DAMGO, an opioid μ receptor agonist, has been reported to inhibit morphine tolerance, but results from different studies are inconclusive. We evaluated the effect of DAMGO on morphine tolerance using our newly-developed ILP method, as well as other intrathecal catheter paradigms. We found that co-administration of sub-analgesic DAMGO with morphine using ILP did not inhibit morphine tolerance, but instead blocked the analgesic effects of morphine. Tolerance to morphine still developed. Tolerance to morphine can only be blocked by sub-analgesic dose of DAMGO when administered in a lumbar catheter, but not in cervical catheter settings. ^ Finally, we evaluated the effects of Gabapentin (GBP) on analgesia and morphine tolerance. We demonstrated that GBP enhanced analgesia mediated by both subanalgesic and analgesic doses of morphine although GBP itself was not analgesic. GBP increased potency and efficacy of morphine. GBP inhibited the expression, but not the development, of morphine tolerance. GBP blocked tolerance to analgesic morphine but not to subanalgesic morphine. GBP reversed the expression of morphine tolerance even after tolerance was established. These studies may begin to provide new insights into mechanisms of morphine tolerance development and improve clinical chronic pain management. ^

Receptor-mediated adenylylcyclase activation following ``homologous'' and ``heterologous'' desensitization

Using a "collision-coupling" model for $\beta \sb 2$-adrenergic receptor-mediated activation of adenylylcyclase in S49 lymphoma cells, the rate-limiting step of that activation was identified as the association of an "active-state", hormone-bound receptor (HR$\sp\*$) with a G$\sb{\rm s}$-adenylylcyclase moiety (G$\sb{\rm s}$C). It was subsequently hypothesized that the location of the rate-limiting step would not be shifted elsewhere in the activation scheme by receptor desensitization. The traditional focus of receptor desensitization studies has been on modifications of the receptor molecule itself. A "clear-cut" answer to the present hypothesis provides new information on modifications in the function of the receptor following desensitization.^ "Heterologous" desensitization was induced in wild type S49 cells with agents which increase intracellular cAMP without occupying $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptors; PGE$\sb1$, forskolin and dibutyryl cAMP. These treatments avoided overlapping effects on $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptors by the "homologous" mechanism, in which occupancy by hormone is causative. Although the steady-state activation rate was decreased following heterologous desensitization, that rate was still limited by the association between HR* and G$\sb{\rm s}$C. Thus "heterologous" desensitization acts at the equilibrium between HR and HR* (which is driven by hormone efficiency) such that HR* formation becomes less likely and the frequency of HR*G$\sb{\rm s}$C associations decreases.^ "Homologous" desensitization was induced by high (1-10$\mu$M) epinephrine concentrations in the S49 variant deficient in cAMP-dependent protein kinase, KIN$\sp-$. Use of KIN$\sp-$minimized overlapping effects by the "heterologous" mechanism, which is PKA-dependent. Following homologous desensitization, roughly 50% of the receptors in plasma membrane preparations no longer formed HR*G$\sb{\rm s}$C complexes; evidenced by a decrease in high-affinity hormone binding sites. The loss of HR*G$\sb{\rm s}$C formation did not appear related to the HR/HR* equilibrium. Increasing the efficiency of the assay agonist did nothing to "override" the effect. HR*G$\sb{\rm s}$C association was still the rate-limiting step among the remaining functional receptors. It was not distinguishable whether the remaining activity was "desensitized" due to adenylylcyclase having decreased access to receptors within plasma membrane fragments or due to an effect similar to "heterologous" desensitization. ^

Effects of variable Gs expression on $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptor stimulated adenylyl cyclase response

An exact knowledge of the kinetic nature of the interaction between the stimulatory G protein (G$\sb{\rm s}$) and the adenylyl cyclase catalytic unit (C) is essential for interpreting the effects of Gs mutations and expression levels on cellular response to a wide variety of hormones, drugs, and neurotransmitters. In particular, insight as to the association of these proteins could lead to progress in tumor biology where single spontaneous mutations in G proteins have been associated with the formation of tumors (118). The question this work attempts to answer is whether the adenylyl cyclase activation by epinephrine stimulated $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptors occurs via G$\sb{\rm s}$ proteins by a G$\sb{\rm s}$ to C shuttle or G$\sb{\rm s}$-C precoupled mechanism. The two forms of activation are distinguishable by the effect of G$\sb{\rm s}$ levels on epinephrine stimulated EC50 values for cyclase activation.^ We have made stable transfectants of S49 cyc$\sp-$ cells with the gene for the $\alpha$ protein of G$\sb{\rm s}$ $(\alpha\sb{\rm s})$ which is under the control of the mouse mammary tumor virus LTR promoter (110). Expression of G$\sb{\rm s}\alpha$ was then controlled by incubation of the cells for various times with 5 $\mu$M dexamethasone. Expression of G$\sb{\rm s}\alpha$ led to the appearance of GTP shifts in the competitive binding of epinephrine with $\sp{125}$ICYP to the $\beta$-adrenergic receptors and to agonist dependent adenylyl cyclase activity. High expression of G$\sb{\rm s}\alpha$ resulted in lower EC50's for the adenylyl cyclase activity in response to epinephrine than did low expression. By kinetic modelling, this result is consistent with the existence of a shuttle mechanism for adenylyl cyclase activation by hormones.^ One item of concern that remains to be addressed is the extent to which activation of adenylyl cyclase occurs by a "pure" shuttle mechanism. Kinetic and biochemical experiments by other investigators have revealed that adenylyl cyclase activation, by hormones, may occur via a Gs-C precoupled mechanism (80, 94, 97). Activation of adenylyl cyclase, therefore, probably does not occur by either a pure "'Shuttle" or "Gs-C Precoupled" mechanism, but rather by a "Hybrid" mechanism. The extent to which either the shuttle or precoupled mechanism contributes to hormone stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity is the subject of on-going research. ^

Molecular mechanisms of protein kinase-mediated desensitization and internalization of the $\beta$-adrenergic receptor

The $\beta$-adrenergic receptor ($\beta$AR), which couples to G$\sb{\rm s}$ and activates adenylylcyclase, has been a prototype for studying the activation and desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors. The main objective of the present study is to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of protein kinase-mediated desensitization and internalization of the $\beta$AR.^ Activation of cAPK or PKC causes a rapid desensitization of $\beta$AR stimulation of adenylylcyclase in L cells, which previous studies suggest involves the cAPK/PKC consensus phosphorylation site in the third intracellular loop of the $\beta$AR, RRSSK$\sp{263}$. To determine the role of the individual serines in the cAPK- and PKC-meditated desensitizations, wild type (WT) and mutant $\beta$ARs containing the substitutions, Ser$\sp{261} \to$ A, Ser$\sp{262} \to$ A, Ser$\sp{262} \to$ D, and Ser$\sp{261/262} \to$ A, were constructed and stably transfected into L cells. The cAPK-mediated desensitization was decreased 70-80% by the Ser$\sp{262} \to$ A, Ser$\sp{262} \to$ D, and the Ser$\sp{261/262} \to$ A mutations, but was not altered by the Ser$\sp{261} \to$ A substitution, demonstrating that Ser$\sp{262}$ was the primary site of the cAPK-induced desensitization. The PMA/PKC-induced desensitization was unaffected by either of the single serine to alanine substitutions, but was reduced 80% by the double serine to alanine substitution, suggesting that either serine was sufficient to confer the PKC-mediated desensitization. Coincident stimulation of cAPK and PKC caused an additive desensitization which was significantly reduced (80%) only by the double substitution mutation. Quantitative evaluation of the coupling efficiencies and the GTP-shift of the WT and mutant receptors demonstrated that only one of the mutants, Ser$\sp{262} \to$ A, was partially uncoupled. The Ser$\sp{262} \to$ D mutation did not significantly uncouple, demonstrating that introducing a negative charge did not appear to mimic the desensitized state of the receptor.^ To accomplish the in vivo phosphorylation of the $\beta$AR, we used two epitope-modified $\beta$ARs, hemagglutinin-tagged $\beta$AR (HA-$\beta$AR) and 6 histidine-tagged $\beta$AR (6His-$\beta$AR), for a high efficiency purification of the $\beta$AR. Neither HA-$\beta$AR nor 6His-$\beta$AR altered activation and desensitization of the $\beta$AR significantly as compared to unmodified wild type $\beta$AR. 61% recovery of ICYP-labeled $\beta$AR was obtained with Ni-NTA column chromatography.^ The truncation 354 mutant $\beta$AR(T354), lacking putative $\beta$ARK site(s), displayed a normal epinephrine stimulation of adenylylcyclase. Although 1.0 $\mu$M epinephrine induced 60% less desensitization in T354 as compared to wild type $\beta$AR, 1.0 $\mu$M epinephrine-mediated desensitization in T354 was 35% greater than PGE$\sb1$-mediated desensitization, which is essentially identical in both WT and T354. These results suggested that sequences downstream of residue 354 may play a role in homologous desensitization and that internalization may be attributed to the additional desensitization besides the cAMP mechanism in T354 $\beta$AR. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

Evidence for the role of agonist binding frequency in receptor -mediated activation of adenylate cyclase

$\beta$-adrenergic receptor-mediated activation of adenylate cyclase exhibits an agonist-specific separation between the dose/response curve (characterized by the EC$\sb{50}$) and the dose/binding curve (characterized by the K$\sb{\rm d}$). Cyclase activity can be near-maximal when receptor occupancy is quite low (EC$\sb{50}$ $\ll$ K$\sb{\rm d}$). This separation between the binding and response curves can be explained by the assumption that the rate of cyclase activation is proportional to the concentration of agonist-bound receptors, since the receptor is mobile and can activate more than one cyclase (the Collision Coupling Model of Tolkovsky and Levitzki). Here it is established that agonist binding frequency plays an additional role in adenylate cyclase activation in S49 murine lymphoma cells. Using epinephrine (EC$\sb{50}$ = 10 nM, K$\sb{\rm d}$ = 2 $\mu$M), the rate of cyclase activation decreased by 80% when a small (1.5%) receptor occupancy was restricted (by addition of the antagonist propranolol) to a small number (1.5%) of receptors rather than being proportionally distributed among the cell's entire population of receptors. Thus adenylate cyclase activity is not proportional to receptor occupancy in all circumstances. Collisions between receptor and cyclase pairs apparently occur a number of times in rapid sequence (an encounter); the high binding frequency of epinephrine ensures that discontiguous regions of the cell surface experience some period of agonist-bound receptor activity per small unit time minimizing "wasted" collisions between activated cyclase and bound receptor within an encounter. A contribution of agonist binding frequency to activation is thus possible when: (1) the mean lifetime of the agonist-receptor complex is shorter than the mean encounter time, and (2) the absolute efficiency (intrinsic ability to promote cyclase activation per collision) of the agonist-receptor complex is high. These conclusions are supported by experiments using agonists of different efficiencies and binding frequencies. These results are formalized in the Encounter Coupling Model of adenylate cyclase activation, which takes into explicit account the agonist binding frequency, agonist affinity for the $\beta$-adrenergic receptor, agonist efficiency, encounter frequency and the encounter time between receptor and cyclase. ^