The social construction of infant mortality: From grassroots to medicalization

Infant mortality as a problematic situation has been recognized for some 130 years in one form or another. It has undergone various changes in its empirical dimensions relative to whom we study within the population, what we study--low birth-weight vs. pre-term births--and how we study it--whether demographically or medically. An analysis of the process by which the condition was raised by claims makers as an intolerable situation among America's urban residents reveals that demographic and medical data were sparse. Nonetheless, a judgement about the meaning and significance of the condition was made, and that interpretation led to the promulgation of systems to both document and address the condition as it has come to be defined.^ This investigation depicts the historical context and natural history of infant mortality as one of a number of social problems that came to be defined through the interplay among groups and individuals making claims and how their claims came to the public policy agenda as worthy of collective resources--who won, who lost and why. The process of social definition focuses attention on the claims makers and the ways they contrast the meaning, origins and remedies for this troubling condition. The historical context becomes the frame of reference for understanding the actions of the claims makers and the meaning and significance they attached to the problem.^ We purport that "context" provides a closer reality than disjoined "value free" accounts. Context provides the evidence for the definition, who participated in the process, why and by what means.^ The role of women in the definitional process reveals the differences in approaches utilized by the women of the settlement house reform movement and African-American women working at the grass-roots. Much of the work done by these two groups provided options to the problem's remedy; however, their differences paved the way to our current (principally medically-oriented) definition and its inherent limitations. ^

An assessment of risk of osteogenic sarcoma from exposure to radium

The etiology of the vast majority of osteosarcoma deaths has not been explained. A possible explanation might be lifetime ingestion of radium from environmental sources which might give rise to differential risk. This study was an effort toward understanding the role of naturally occurring radium in the etiology of bone cancer. Furthermore, there was an interest in the interaction of between radionuclides and selenium; the latter believed to be a potential anticarcinogen.^ Two approaches were used to evaluate the association between environmental radium, selenium and osteogenic sarcoma: (1) spatial and temporal patterns of osteogenic sarcoma mortality in Texas were described for the period from 1969 to 1988; and (2) a case-control study was performed using 974 osteosarcoma deaths and category-matched controls selected from other deaths to evaluate the association between this disease and residency history as an indirect measure of radium and selenium exposures.^ Analyses and comparison of mortality in a population exposed to regions of elevated levels of radium 226,228 and elevated levels of selenium in drinking water with those in a matched control population have resulted in three observations: (1) there appeared to be a slight protective effect for residing in areas high in radium; (2) there were no significant differences between cases and controls when observed for length of residence or residence in urban/rural regions of high or low radium; and (3) although regions high in selenium appeared to have a decreased risk for bone cancer and urban areas in regions of elevated selenium showed an increased risk of bone cancer, these differences were not significant. ^