IMMUNOGLOBULINS IN PERIODONTAL DISEASE

Periodontal disease is the major cause of tooth loss in man. The initial histological picture of the inflamed gingiva is characteristic of local inflammatory reaction involving polymorphonuclear leukocytes, vasculitis and localized tissue loss. Subsequent clinical stages of periodontal disease (mild gingivitis) show histological evidence of the involvement of the immune response with initial accumulation of macrophages, and lymphocytes devoid of surface staining immunoglobulins (presumably T cells). As the disease progresses, a predominance of surface and cytoplasmic staining lymphocytes and plasma cells are seen (severe gingivitis and periodontitis). Whether the occurrence of the immunoglobulin positive lymphocytes and the concurrent loss of collagen and resorption of alveolar bone seen in periodontitis is indicative of a direct cause and effect relationship has been a controversy.^ The majority of investigations in the periodontal field have involved the use of peripheral blood lymphocytes or serum. Blastogenic responses of peripheral blood lymphocytes and serum antibody titers from periodontal patients to a variety of oral bacteria have not shown any correlation between response and the severity of disease. The need to study the local immune response in inflamed gingiva is apparent. Since there are no baseline studies on the functional capabilities of the lymphoid cells present in gingiva from periodontitis patients, an in depth study involving the role of the immunoglobulin positive lymphocytes was investigated.^ Inflamed gingiva from four clinically defined periodontal disease states (mild gingivitis, severe gingivitis, periodontitis and severe periodontitis) were placed in gingival organ cultures. Class specific immunoglobulins were quantitated in gingival organ culture supernatants using an indirect sandwich technique. A significant difference in mean levels of IgA and IgG was seen between mild gingivitis and periodontitis (P < .00l, P = .001), as well as in IgG levels between periodontitis and severe periodontitis (P = .001). The predominance of IgG in gingival organ culture supernatants and the statistically significant findings that the overall mean levels of IgG between mild gingivitis and periodontitis (P = .014) and between severe periodontitis and periodontitis (P = .001) suggested a possible indicator of periodontal disease. The presence of IgG in gingival organ culture supernatants was shown to be a product of actively secreting plasma cells. The incorporation of radiolabelled amino acids into IgG was noted over a seven-day period with a peak response at day 4-5. The inhibition of IgG synthesis by cyclohexamide confirmed the contention that IgG was a product of de novo synthesis and not serum derived.^ The specificity of immunoglobulins derived from gingival organ cultures were studied using a whole bacterial agglutination test. Oral bacteria frequently cultured from periodontal patients were assessed for their ability to be agglutinated by gingival organ culture supernatants. A positive correlation of antibody titer and severity of disease was seen with five strains of Actinomyces viscosus, two of Actinomyces naeslundii and one Actinomyces israelii. The agglutination of bacteria was shown to be due to the specific interaction of immunoglobulin and cell-wall antigen. ^

AN IMPLANTABLE MOSFET DOSIMETER MODIFIED TO ACT AS A FIDUCIAL MARKER

In external beam radiation therapy, it is imperative that the prescribed dose is administered to the correct location and in the correct amount. Though several ex vivo methods of quality assurance are currently employed to achieve this goal, verifying that the correct dose is received within the patient in situ is impossible without the capability of measuring dose inside the patient. Recently, a method of measuring dose delivered within the patient has been developed, an implantable MOSFET dosimeter. This dosimeter is implanted within the patient and records the dose received. Since the dosimeter is implanted in the patient, it could serve a dual function as a fiducial marker for image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) treatment if it could be modified to be visible on x-rays. In this study, modifications to the MOSFET dosimeter were made to increase its visibility for IGRT treatment. To test whether the modifications hindered the dosimeter’s ability to accurately measure and transmit dose information, the energy dependence, angular dependence and wireless read range of the modified dosimeter were measured and compared to unmodified dosimeters. It was found that the modified dosimeter performed as well as the unmodified dosimeter while also being suitable for use as a fiducial marker for IGRT treatment.

Use of a modified delphi process for establishing occupational exposure limits in support of health surveillance for space travelers

On-orbit exposures can come from numerous factors related to the space environment as evidenced by almost 50 years of environmental samples collected for water analysis, air analysis, radiation analysis, and physiologic parameters. For astronauts and spaceflight participants the occupational exposures can be very different from those experienced by workers performing similar tasks in workplaces on Earth, because the duration of the exposure could be continuous for very long orbital, and eventually interplanetary, missions. The establishment of long-term exposure standards is vital to controlling the quality of the spacecraft environment over long periods. NASA often needs to update and revise its prior exposure standards (Spacecrafts Maximum Allowable Concentrations (SMACs)). Traditional standards-setting processes are often lengthy, so a more rapid method to review and establish standards would be a substantial advancement in this area. This project investigates use of the Delphi method for this purpose. ^ In order to achieve the objectives of this study a modified Delphi methodology was tested in three trials executed by doctoral students and a panel of experts in disciplines related to occupational safety and health. During each test/trial modifications were made to the methodology. Prior to submission of the Delphi Questionnaire to the panel of experts a pilot study/trial was conducted using five doctoral students with the goals of testing and adjusting the Delphi questionnaire to improve comprehension, work out any procedural issues and evaluate the effectiveness of the questionnaire in drawing the desired responses. The remainder of the study consisted of two trials of the Modified Delphi process using 6 chemicals that currently have the potential of causing occupational exposures to NASA astronauts or spaceflight participants. To assist in setting Occupational Exposure Limits (OEL), the expert panel was established consisting of experts from academia, government and industry. Evidence was collected and used to create close-ended questionnaires which were submitted to the Delphi panel of experts for the establishment of OEL values for three chemicals from the list of six originally selected (trial 1). Once the first Delphi trial was completed, adjustments were made to the Delphi questionnaires and the process above was repeated with the remaining 3 chemicals (trial 2). ^ Results indicate that experience in occupational safety and health and with OEL methodologies can have a positive effect in minimizing the time experts take in completing this process. Based on the results of the questionnaires and comparison of the results with the SMAC already established by NASA, we conclude that use of the Delphi methodology is appropriate for use in the decision-making process for the selection of OELs.^