Effect of continuous gastric enteral feeding on tonometric measurement of gastric intramucosal carbon dioxide levels in healthy volunteers

Purpose. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effect of enteral feeding on tonometric measurement of gastric regional carbon dioxide levels (PrCO2) in normal healthy volunteers. Design and methods. The sample included 12 healthy volunteers recruited by the University Clinical Research Center (UCRC). An air tonometry system monitored PrCO2 levels using a tonometer placed in the lumen of the stomach via orogastric intubation. PrCO2 was automatically measured and recorded every 10 minutes throughout the five hour study period. An oral dose of famotidine 40 mg was self-administered the evening prior to and the morning of the study. Instillation of Isocal® High Nitrogen (HN) was used for enteral feeding in hourly escalating doses of 0, 40, 60, and 80 ml/hr with no feeding during the fifth hour. Results . PrCO2 measurements at time 0 and 10 minutes (41.4 ± 6.5 and 41.8 ± 5.7, respectively) demonstrated biologic precision (Levene's Test statistic = 0.085, p-value 0.774). Biologic precision was lost between T130 and T140 40 when compared to baseline TO (Levene's Test statistic = 1.70, p-value 0.205; and 3.205, p-value 0.042, respectively) and returned to non-significant levels between T270 and T280 (Levene's Test statistic = 3.083, p-value 0.043; and 2.307, p-value 0.143, respectively). Isocal® HN significantly affected the biologic accuracy of PrCO2 measurements (repeated measures ANOVA F 4.91, p-value <0.001). After 20 minutes of enteral feeding at 40 ml/hr, PrCO2 significantly increased (41.4 ± 6.5 to 46.6 ± 4.25, F = 5.4, p-value 0.029). Maximum variance from baseline (41.4 ± 6.5 to 61.3 ± 15.2, F = 17.22, p-value <0.001) was noted after 30 minutes of Isocal® HN at 80 ml/hr or 210 minutes from baseline. The significant elevations in PrCO2 continued throughout the study. Sixty minutes after discontinuation of enteral feeding, PrCO2 remained significantly elevated from baseline (41.4 ± 6.5 to 51.8 ± 9.2, F = 10.15, p-value 0.004). Conclusion. Enteral feeding with Isocal® HN significantly affects the precision and accuracy of PrCO2 measurements in healthy volunteers. ^

The effect of triage team on time-in-department in a pediatric emergency department

Objective. To determine whether the use of a triage team would reduce the average time-in-department in a pediatric emergency department by 25%.^ Methods. A triage team consisting of a physician, a nurse, and a nurse's assistant initiated work-ups and saw patients who required minimal lab work-up and were likely to be discharged. Study days were randomized. Our inclusion criteria were all children seen in the emergency center between 6p and 2a Monday-Friday. Our exclusion criteria included resuscitations, inpatient-inpatient transfers, left without being seen, leaving against medical advice, any child seen outside of 6p-2am Monday-Friday and on the weekends. A Pearson-Chi square was used for comparison of the two groups for heterogeneity. For the time-in-department analysis, we performed a 2 sided t-test with a set alpha of 0.05 using Mann Whitney U looking for differences in time-in-department based on acuity level, disposition, and acuity level stratified by disposition. ^ Results. Among urgent and non-urgent patients, we found a statistically significant decrease in time-in-department in a pediatric emergency department. Urgent patients had a time-in-department that was 51 minutes shorter than patients seen on non-triage team days (p=0.007), which represents a 14% decrease in time-in-department. Non-urgent patients seen on triage team days had a time-in-department that was 24 minutes shorter than non-urgent patients seen on non-triage team days (p=0.009). From the disposition perspective, discharged patients seen on triage team days had a shorter time-in-department of 28 minutes as compared to those seen on non-triage team days (p=0.012). ^ Conclusion. Overall, there was a trend towards decreased time-in-department of 19 minutes (5.9% decrease) during triage team times. There was a statistically significant decrease in the time-in-department among urgent patients of 51 minutes (13.9% decrease) and among discharged patients of 28 minutes (8.4% decrease). Urgent care patients make up nearly a quarter of the emergency patient population and decreasing their time-in-department would likely make a significant impact on overall emergency flow.^