HUMAN PROPHASE CHROMOSOME UNIQUE BAND SEQUENCES; DEFINITION, CHARACTERIZATION, AND APPLICATION (CYTOGENETICS, IMAGE PROCESSING)

Extensive experience with the analysis of human prophase chromosomes and studies into the complexity of prophase GTG-banding patterns have suggested that at least some prophase chromosomal segments can be accurately identified and characterized independently of the morphology of the chromosome as a whole. In this dissertation the feasibility of identifying and analyzing specified prophase chromosome segments was thus investigated as an alternative approach to prophase chromosome analysis based on whole chromosome recognition. Through the use of prophase idiograms at the 850-band-stage (FRANCKE, 1981) and a comparison system based on the calculation of cross-correlation coefficients between idiogram profiles, we have demonstrated that it is possible to divide the 24 human prophase idiograms into a set of 94 unique band sequences. Each unique band sequence has a banding pattern that is recognizable and distinct from any other non-homologous chromosome portion.^ Using chromosomes 11p and 16 thru 22 to demonstrate unique band sequence integrity at the chromosome level, we found that prophase chromosome banding pattern variation can be compensated for and that a set of unique band sequences very similar to those at the idiogram level can be identified on actual chromosomes.^ The use of a unique band sequence approach in prophase chromosome analysis is expected to increase efficiency and sensitivity through more effective use of available banding information. The use of a unique band sequence approach to prophase chromosome analysis is discussed both at the routine level by cytogeneticists and at an image processing level with a semi-automated approach to prophase chromosome analysis. ^

3D visualization of HIV virions by cryoelectron tomography.

The structure of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and some of its components have been difficult to study in three-dimensions (3D) primarily because of their intrinsic structural variability. Recent advances in cryoelectron tomography (cryo-ET) have provided a new approach for determining the 3D structures of the intact virus, the HIV capsid, and the envelope glycoproteins located on the viral surface. A number of cryo-ET procedures related to specimen preservation, data collection, and image processing are presented in this chapter. The techniques described herein are well suited for determining the ultrastructure of bacterial and viral pathogens and their associated molecular machines in situ at nanometer resolution.

The Role of the Arched Helicases in Exosome-Mediated Function

RNA processing and degradation are two important functions that control gene expression and promote RNA fidelity in the cell. A major ribonuclease complex, called the exosome, is involved in both of these processes. The exosome is composed of ten essential proteins with only one catalytically active subunit, called Rrp44. While the same ten essential subunits make up both the nuclear and cytoplasmic exosome, there are nuclear and cytoplasmic exosome cofactors that promote specific exosome functions in each of the cell compartments. To date, it is unclear how the exosome distinguishes between RNA substrates. We hypothesize that compartment specific cofactors may promote the substrate specificity of the exosome. In this work, I characterize several cofactors of the exosome, both nuclear and cytoplasmic. First, I describe the arch domain, which is a unique domain in a nuclear and a cytoplasmic cofactor of the exosome. Specifically, I show that the arch domain of the nuclear exosome cofactor, Mtr4, is required for specific exosome-mediated activities and overlaps functionally with the exosome-associated exonuclease, Rrp6. Further, I show that the arch domain of Ski2 is required for the degradation of normal and aberrant mRNAs. Additionally, this work describes in detail the Mtr4 domains involved in the physical association with other RNA processing proteins. Further, I characterize the minimal Mtr4-binding region in a third exosome cofactor, Trf5. Understanding how exosome cofactors synergistically promote exosome function will provide us a better understanding of how the exosome complex precisely regulates its catalytic activities. As described here, cofactors play a major role in determining the substrate specificity of the nuclear and cytoplasmic exosome. Moreover, specific accessory domains, which are not involved in the catalytic function of the cofactor, are required for substrate targeting of the eukaryotic RNA exosome.