Is depression associated with insulin resistance? A systematic review

Studies suggest that depression affects glucose metabolism, and therefore is a risk factor for insulin resistance. The association between depression and insulin resistance has been investigated in a number of studies, but there is no agreement on the results. The objective of this study is to survey the epidemiological studies, identify the ones that measured the association of depression (as exposure) with insulin resistance (as outcome), and perform a systematic review to assess the reliability and strength of the association. For high quality reporting, and assessment, this systematic review used the outlined procedures, guidelines and recommendations for reviews in health care, suggested by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, along with recommendations from the STROBE group (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology). Ovid MEDLINE 1996 to April Week 1 2010, was used to identify the relevant epidemiological studies. To identify the most relevant set of articles for this systematic review, a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Six studies that met the specific criteria were selected. Key information from identified studies was tabulated, and the methodological quality, internal and external validity, and the strength of the evidence of the selected studies were assessed. The result from the tabulated data of the reviewed studies indicates that the studies either did not apply a case definition for insulin resistance in their investigation, or did not state a specific value for the index used to define insulin resistance. The quality assessment of the reviewed studies indicates that to assess the association between insulin resistance and depression, specifying a case definition for insulin resistance is important. The case definition for insulin resistance is defined by the World Health Organization and the European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance as the insulin sensitivity index of the lowest quartile or lowest decile of a general population, respectively. Three studies defined the percentile cut-off point for insulin resistance, but did not give the insulin sensitivity index value. In these cases, it is not possible to compare the results. Three other studies did not define the cut-off point for insulin resistance. In these cases, it is hard to confirm the existence of insulin resistance. In conclusion, to convincingly answer our question, future studies need to adopt a clear case definition, define a percentile cut-off point and reference population, and give value of the insulin resistance measure at the specified percentile.^

Body weight, insulin resistance, and serum adipokine levels 2 years after 2 types of bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Bariatric surgery reverses obesity-related comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes mellitus. Several studies have already described differences in anthropometrics and body composition in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, but the role of adipokines in the outcomes after the different types of surgery is not known. Differences in weight loss and reversal of insulin resistance exist between the 2 groups and correlate with changes in adipokines. METHODS: Fifteen severely obese women (mean body mass index [BMI]: 46.7 kg/m(2)) underwent 2 types of laparoscopic weight loss surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass=10, adjustable gastric banding=5). Weight, waist and hip circumference, body composition, plasma metabolic markers, and lipids were measured at set intervals during a 24-month period after surgery. RESULTS: At 24 months, patients who underwent Roux-en-Y were overweight (BMI 29.7 kg/m(2)), whereas patients who underwent gastric banding remained obese (BMI 36.3 kg/m(2)). Patients who underwent Roux-en-Y lost significantly more fat mass than patients who underwent gastric banding (mean difference 16.8 kg, P<.05). Likewise, leptin levels were lower in the patients who underwent Roux-en-Y (P=.003), and levels correlated with weight loss, loss of fat mass, insulin levels, and Homeostasis Model of Assessment 2. Adiponectin correlated with insulin levels and Homeostasis Model of Assessment 2 (r=-0.653, P=.04 and r=-0.674, P=.032, respectively) in the patients who underwent Roux-en-Y at 24 months. CONCLUSION: After 2 years, weight loss and normalization of metabolic parameters were less pronounced in patients who underwent gastric banding compared with patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Our findings require confirmation in a prospective randomized trial.

Estradiol and insulin cross -talk in breast cancer

Approximately 33% of clinical breast carcinomas require estrogens to proliferate. Epidemiological data show that insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus is 2–3 times more prevalent in women with breast cancer than those with benign breast lesions, suggesting a clinical link between insulin and estradiol. Insulin and estradiol have a synergistic effect on the growth of MCF7 breast cancer cells, and long-term estradiol treatment upregulates the expression of the key insulin signaling protein IRS-1. The goal of this study was to further define the mechanism(s) of cross-talk between insulin and estradiol in regulating the growth of breast cancer. Using MCF7 cells, acute treatment with insulin or estradiol alone was found to stimulate two activities associated with growth: Erk MAP kinase and PI 3-kinase. However, combined acute treatment had an antagonistic effect on both activities. Acute estradiol treatment inhibited the insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 while increasing its serine phosphorylation; the serine phosphorylation was attenuated by the PI 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin. The acute antagonism observed with combined estradiol and insulin are not consistent with the long-term synergistic effect on growth. In contrast, chronic estradiol treatment enhanced the insulin-sensitivity of breast cancer cells as measured by increases in total cellular insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and activation of PI 3-kinase. Estradiol stimulation of gene transcription was found to require PI 3-kinase activity but not MAP kinase activity. Insulin alone had no effect on ER transcriptional activity, but chronic treatment in combination with estradiol resulted in synergism of ER transcription. The synergistic effect of insulin and estradiol on MCF7 cell growth was also found to require PI 3-kinase but not MAP kinase activity. Therefore, chronic estradiol treatment increases insulin stimulation of PI 3-kinase, and PI 3-kinase is required for estradiol stimulation of gene transcription alone and in combined synergy with insulin. These data demonstrate that PI 3-kinase is the locus for the cross-talk between insulin and estradiol which results in enhanced breast cancer growth with long-term exposure to both hormones. This may have important clinical implications for women with high risk for breast cancer and/or diabetes mellitus. ^