SYNTHESIS AND BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF ANTITUMOR ALDOPHOSPHAMIDE ACETALS

Although the major metabolic pathways of cyclophosphamide are well established, the mechanism of antitumor drug selectivity is highly controversial. However, it is widely accepted that aldophosphamide, one of the primary metabolites, plays a crucial role in drug selectivity. In an attempt to gain a better understanding of the mechanism of selectivity of cyclophosphamide, a series of aldophosphamide analogs have been synthesized.^ The new analogs, unlike aldophosphamide, are relatively stable in neutral solution; however, they are converted rapidly to aldehydo intermediates in the presence of carboxylate esterase. Due to structural differences, these analogs may be classified into three different groups, arbitrarily designated as A, B, C, depending upon the facility with which the intermediate aldehydes form 4-hydroxy cyclic tautomers. The half-life of the aldehydo/4-hydroxy cyclic tautomeric mixture is longer for bis(acetoxy)aldophosphamide acetal I (a representative of group A), shorter for the n-ethyl analog III (B), and shortest for the N,N-dimethyl analog IV (C). The ratio of aldophosphamide: 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide at pseudoequilibrium is 1: 4 for compound I, 1: 2 for compound III and 0: 1 for compound IV. The therapeutic efficacy of these compounds are group A $>$ group B $>$ group C. It is apparent that the equilibrium position between the aldehydo and 4-hydroxy cyclic tautomers, which determines their stability, is a crucial determinant of both the cytotoxicity and antitumor selectivity. These findings, taken in conjunction with the aldehyde dehydrogenase selectivity hypothesis, may provide an explanation for the unique antitumor activity of cyclophosphamide. ^

Secondary left ventricular ejection fraction response to beta blocker therapy in heart failure patients

Chronic β-blocker treatment improves survival and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with systolic heart failure (HF). Data on whether the improvement in LVEF after β-blocker therapy is sustained for a long term or whether there is a loss in LVEF after an initial gain is not known. Our study sought to determine the prevalence and prognostic role of secondary decline in LVEF in chronic systolic HF patients on β-blocker therapy and characterize these patients. Retrospective chart review of HF hospitalizations fulfilling Framingham Criteria was performed at the MEDVAMC between April 2000 and June 2006. Follow up vital status and recurrent hospitalizations were ascertained until May 2010. Three groups of patients were identified based on LVEF response to beta blockers; group A with secondary decline in LVEF following an initial increase, group B with progressive increase in LVEF and group C with progressive decline in LVEF. Covariate adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine differences in heart failure re-hospitalizations and all cause mortality between the groups. Twenty five percent (n=27) of patients had a secondary decline in LVEF following an initial gain. The baseline, peak and final LVEF in this group were 27.6±12%, 40.1±14% and 27.4±13% respectively. The mean nadir LVEF after decline was 27.4±13% and this decline occurred at a mean interval of 2.8±1.9 years from the day of beta blocker initiation. These patients were older, more likely to be whites, had advanced heart failure (NYHA class III/IV) more due to a non ischemic etiology compared to groups B & C. They were also more likely to be treated with metoprolol (p=0.03) compared to the other two groups. No significant differences were observed in combined risk of all cause mortality and HF re-hospitalization [hazard ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.38, p=0.42]. No significant difference was observed in survival estimates between the groups. In conclusion, a late decline in LVEF does occur in a significant proportion of heart failure patients treated with beta blockers, more so in patients treated with metoprolol.^

Alpha C protein of group B Streptococcus as a potential vaccine candidate

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of life-threatening infection in neonates and young infants, pregnant women, and non-pregnant adults with underlying medical conditions. Immunization has theoretical potential to prevent significant morbidity and mortality from GBS disease. Alpha C protein (α C), found in 70% of non-type III capsule polysaccharide group B Streptococcus, elicits antibodies protective against α C-expressing strains in experimental animals and is an appealing carrier for a GBS conjugate vaccine. We determined whether natural exposure to α C elicits antibodies in women and if high maternal α C-specific serum antibody at delivery is associated with protection against neonatal disease. An ELISA was designed to measure α C-specific IgM and IgG in human sera. A case-control design (1:3 ratio) was used to match α C-expressing GBS colonized and non-colonized women by age and compare quantified serum α C-specific IgM and IgG. Sera also were analyzed from bacteremic neonates and their mothers and from women with invasive GBS disease. Antibody concentrations were compared using t-tests on log-transformed data. Geometric mean concentrations of α C-specific IgM and IgG were similar in sera from 58 α C strain colonized and 174 age-matched non-colonized women (IgG 245 and 313 ng/ml; IgM 257 and 229 ng/ml, respectively). Delivery sera from mothers of 42 neonates with GBS α C sepsis had similar concentrations of α C-specific IgM (245 ng/ml) and IgG (371 ng/ml), but acute sera from 13 women with invasive α C-expressing GBS infection had significantly higher concentrations (IgM 383 and IgG 476 ng/ml [p=0.036 and 0.038, respectively]). Convalescent sera from 5 of these women 16-49 days later had high α C-specific IgM and IgG concentrations (1355 and 4173 ng/ml, respectively). In vitro killing of α C-expressing GBS correlated with total α C-specific antibody concentration. Invasive disease but not colonization elicits α C-specific IgM and IgG in adults. Whether α C-specific IgG induced by vaccine would protect against disease in neonates merits further investigation. ^