Molecular mechanisms of response in gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib mesylate

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) represent 80% of sarcoma arising from the GI tract. The inciting event in tumor progression is mutation of the kit or, rarely, platelet derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFR) gene. These mutations encode ligand independent, constitutively active proteins: Kit or PDGFR. ^ These tumors are notoriously chemo and radio resistant. Historically, patients with advanced disease realized a median overall survival of 9 months. However, with modern management of GIST with imatinib mesylate (Novartis), a small molecule inhibitor of the Kit, PDGFR, and Abl tyrosine kinases, patients now realize a median overall survival greater than 30 months. However, almost half of patients present with surgically resectable GIST and the utility of imatinib in this context has not been prospectively studied. Also, therapeutic benefit of imatinib is variable from patient to patient and alternative targeted therapy is emerging as potential alternatives to imatinib. Thus, elucidating prognostic factors for patients with GIST in the imatinib-era is crucial to providing optimal care to each particular patient. Moreover, the exact mechanism of action of imatinib in GIST is not fully understood. Therefore, physicians find difficulty in accurately predicting which patient will benefit from imatinib, how to assess response to therapy, and the time at which to assess response. ^ I have hypothesized that imatinib is tolerable and clinically beneficial in the context of surgery, VEGF expression and kit non-exon 11 genotypes portend poor survival on imatinib therapy, and imatinib's mechanism of action is in part due to anti-vascular effects and inhibition of the Kit/SCF signaling axis of tumor-associated endothelial cells. ^ Results herein demonstrate that imatinib is safe and increases the duration of disease-free survival when combined with surgery. Radiographic and molecular (namely, apoptosis) changes occur within 3 days of imatinib initiation. I illustrate that non-exon 11 mutant genotypes and VEGF are poor prognostic factors for patients treated with imatinib. These findings may allow for patient stratification to emerging therapies rather than imatinib. I show that imatinib has anti-vascular effects via inducing tumor endothelial cell apoptosis perhaps by abrogation of the Kit/SCF signaling axis. ^

Clinical and economic outcomes of serious postoperative infections following resection of common respiratory and gastrointestinal solid tumors

Unlike infections occurring during periods of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, postoperative infections in patients with solid malignancy remain largely understudied. The purpose of this population-based study was to evaluate the clinical and economic burden, as well as the relationship of hospital surgical volume and outcomes associated with serious postoperative infection (SPI) – i.e., bacteremia/sepsis, pneumonia, and wound infection – following resection of common solid tumors.^ From the Texas Discharge Data Research File, we identified all Texas residents who underwent resection of cancer of the lung, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, colon, or rectum between 2002 and 2006. From their billing records, we identified ICD-9 codes indicating SPI and also subsequent SPI-related readmissions occurring within 30 days of surgery. Random-effects logistic regression was used to calculate the impact of SPI on mortality, as well as the association between surgical volume and SPI, adjusting for case-mix, hospital characteristics, and clustering of multiple surgical admissions within the same patient and patients within the same hospital. Excess bed days and costs were calculated by subtracting values for patients without infections from those with infections computed using multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear model by fitting a gamma distribution to the data using log link.^ Serious postoperative infection occurred following 9.4% of the 37,582 eligible tumor resections and was independently associated with an 11-fold increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI], 6.7-18.5, P < 0.001). Patients with SPI required 6.3 additional hospital days (95% CI, 6.1 - 6.5) at an incremental cost of $16,396 (95% CI, $15,927–$16,875). There was a significant trend toward lower overall rates of SPI with higher surgical volume (P=0.037). ^ Due to the substantial morbidity, mortality, and excess costs associated with SPI following solid tumor resections and given that, under current reimbursement practices, most of this heavy burden is borne by acute care providers, it is imperative for hospitals to identify more effective prophylactic measures, so that these potentially preventable infections and their associated expenditures can be averted. Additional volume-outcomes research is also needed to identify infection prevention processes that can be transferred from higher- to lower-volume providers.^