A STUDY OF ZINC CONCENTRATION IN HAIR AS AN INDICATION OF ZINC IMBALANCES

Trace metal imbalances have been implicated in several disease and nutritional states. There is mounting concern to identify the nutritional balance of the trace metals needed for growth, mental acuity and physical functioning. These two factors, diseases in which trace metals show involvement and nutritional balance, have made it necessary to be able to accurately describe the trace metal balances of an individual. Although several investigators have measured the concentration of trace metals in the hair and related those observed concentrations to various disease and nutritional states, no one has satisfactorily answered the questions of whether hair is useful to determine trace metal imbalances, whether the concentrations found in hair reflect tissue or serum concentrations of the trace metals, or whether any tissue accurately reflects body status of the trace metals.^ Male mice were used to examine several tissues, heart, liver, kidney, spleen, intestine, brain, bone, hair and serum for copper and zinc concentrations. The environment and dietary intake of the animals were carefully controlled, so that environmental and physical variables were minimized. Dietary intake of zinc was varied while copper intake was held constant. Each experimental diet group was matched with a pair fed control group.^ Of the tissues examined, only the serum was indicative of an early state of zinc imbalance. Neither hair nor the other tissues examined for copper and zinc concentrations were indicative of an acute zinc imbalance in a normal mature mouse. Zinc deficiencies or excesses may manifest themself differently in the chronic imbalance state or in the weanling, aged or traumatized mouse. The tissue response to zinc imbalance may vary in these cases. ^

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FEDERAL FAMILY PLANNING POLICY: AN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING STATE EXPENDITURES, FISCAL YEARS 1976-1981 (WOMEN, BUDGET, POPULATION)

The purpose of this study was to analyze the implementation of national family planning policy in the United States, which was embedded in four separate statutes during the period of study, Fiscal Years 1976-81. The design of the study utilized a modification of the Sabatier and Mazmanian framework for policy analysis, which defined implementation as the carrying out of statutory policy. The study was divided into two phases. The first part of the study compared the implementation of family planning policy by each of the pertinent statutes. The second part of the study identified factors that were associated with implementation of federal family planning policy within the context of block grants.^ Implemention was measured here by federal dollars spent for family planning, adjusted for the size of the respective state target populations. Expenditure data were collected from the Alan Guttmacher Institute and from each of the federal agencies having administrative authority for the four pertinent statutes, respectively. Data from the former were used for most of the analysis because they were more complete and more reliable.^ The first phase of the study tested the hypothesis that the coherence of a statute is directly related to effective implementation. Equity in the distribution of funds to the states was used to operationalize effective implementation. To a large extent, the results of the analysis supported the hypothesis. In addition to their theoretical significance, these findings were also significant for policymakers insofar they demonstrated the effectiveness of categorical legislation in implementing desired health policy.^ Given the current and historically intermittent emphasis on more state and less federal decision-making in health and human serives, the second phase of the study focused on state level factors that were associated with expenditures of social service block grant funds for family planning. Using the Sabatier-Mazmanian implementation model as a framework, many factors were tested. Those factors showing the strongest conceptual and statistical relationship to the dependent variable were used to construct a statistical model. Using multivariable regression analysis, this model was applied cross-sectionally to each of the years of the study. The most striking finding here was that the dominant determinants of the state spending varied for each year of the study (Fiscal Years 1976-1981). The significance of these results was that they provided empirical support of current implementation theory, showing that the dominant determinants of implementation vary greatly over time. ^