Medulloblastomas overexpress the p53-inactivating oncogene WIP1/PPM1D.

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor of childhood. Despite numerous advances, clinical challenges range from recurrent and progressive disease to long-term toxicities in survivors. The lack of more effective, less toxic therapies results from our limited understanding of medulloblastoma growth. Although TP53 is the most commonly altered gene in cancers, it is rarely mutated in medulloblastoma. Accumulating evidence, however, indicates that TP53 pathways are disrupted in medulloblastoma. Wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (WIP1 or PPM1D) encodes a negative regulator of p53. WIP1 amplification (17q22-q23) and its overexpression have been reported in diverse cancer types. We examined primary medulloblastoma specimens and cell lines, and detected WIP1 copy gain and amplification prevalent among but not exclusively in the tumors with 17q gain and isochromosome 17q (i17q), which are among the most common cytogenetic lesions in medulloblastoma. WIP1 RNA levels were significantly higher in the tumors with 17q gain or i17q. Immunoblots confirmed significant WIP1 protein in primary tumors, generally higher in those with 17q gain or i17q. Under basal growth conditions and in response to the chemotherapeutic agent, etoposide, WIP1 antagonized p53-mediated apoptosis in medulloblastoma cell lines. These results indicate that medulloblastoma express significant levels of WIP1 that modulate genotoxic responsiveness by negatively regulating p53.

The mechanism of the pharmacological actions of dexrazoxane on different tissue types

Approximately 6,600 people die from acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) on an annual basis. During the past 10 to 15 years, there has been gradual overall improvements in the therapy of this disease, yet the majority of patients with AML succumb to this disease. In an attempt to improve current therapeutic strategies for AML, we became interested in a commercially available drug, dexrazoxane, which protects against anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. We have investigated dexrazoxane's (DEX) effects on different tissue types in an effort to determine its unique mechanism of action. Colony forming assays were used to evaluate stem-cell renewal of myeloid cells in vitro and median effect analysis was used to evaluate antagonism, synergism, or additivity. The anthracyclines, doxorubicin, daunorubicin, and idarubicin were individually combined with DEX in leukemic myeloid models to determine if the combination of the two drugs resulted in a synergistic, additive or antagonistic effect. Etoposide and cytosine arabinoside were also evaluated in combination with DEX using the same in vitro model and evaluated similarly. ^ Dexrazoxane in combination with any of the anthracyclines was schedule dependent. The combination of DEX and anthracycline resulted in a greater antitumor effect than anthracycline alone except for DEX administered 24 hours before doxorubicin or daunorubicin. These data were corroborated through median effect analysis. Etoposide in combination with dexrazoxane was synergistic for all combinations, and the combination of cytosine arabinoside and DEX was schedule dependent. In contrast, using an in vivo gastrointestinal model, DEX in combination with doxorubicin was antagonistic for almost all of the ratios used, except for the highest. A Withers' assay was used to evaluate toxicity on jejunal crypt cells. No effect was apparent for the combination of idarubicin and DEX, however, as seen with RZ, DEX in addition to radiation greatly potentiated the cytotoxic effects of radiation on crypts. These paradoxical effects of dexrazoxane were initially enigmatic, but after additional investigation, we propose a model that explains our findings. We conclude that DEX in combination with anthracyclines produces an additive to synergistic antileukemic response and may have therapeutic potential clinically. Additionally, DEX protects the gastrointestinal tract from doxorubicin toxicity, which could have clinical implications for the administration of greater doses of doxorubicin. ^

The mechanism of action of a novel benzo[c]phenanthridine alkaloid, NK314 and the cellular responses

NK314 is a novel synthetic benzo[c]phenanthridine alkaloid that is currently in clinical trials as an antitumor compound, based on impressive activities in preclinical models. However, its mechanism of action is unknown. The present investigations were directed at determining the mechanism of action of this agent and cellular responses to NK314. My studies demonstrated that NK314 intercalated into DNA, trapped topoisomerase IIα in its cleavage complex intermediate, and inhibited the ability of topoisomerase IIα to relax super-coiled DNA. CEM/VM1 cells, which are resistant to etoposide due to mutations in topoisomerase IIα, were cross-resistant to NK314. However, CEM/C2 cells, which are resistant to camptothecin due to mutations in topoisomerase I, retained sensitivity. This indicates topoisomerase IIα is the target of NK314 in the cells. NK314 caused phosphorylation of the histone variant, H2AX, which is considered a marker of DNA double-strand breaks. DNA double-strand breaks were also evidenced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and visualized as chromosomal aberrations after cells were treated with NK314 and arrested in mitosis. Cell cycle checkpoints are activated following DNA damage. NK314 induced significant G2 cell cycle arrest in several cell lines, independent of p53 status, suggesting the existence of a common mechanism of checkpoint activation. The Chk1-Cdc25C-Cdk1 G2 checkpoint pathway was activated in response to NK314, which can be abrogated by the Chk1 inhibitor UCN-01. Cell cycle checkpoint activation may be a defensive mechanism that provides time for DNA repair. DNA double-strand breaks are repaired either through ATM-mediated homologous recombination or DNA-PK-mediated non-homologous end-joining repair pathways. Clonogenic assays demonstrated a significant decrease of colony formation in both ATM deficient and DNA-PK deficient cells compared to ATM repleted and DNA-PK wild type cells respectively, indicating that both ATM and DNA-PK play important roles in the survival of the cells in response to NK314. The DNA-PK specific inhibitor NU7441 also significantly sensitized cells to NK314. In conclusion, the major mechanism of NK314 is to intercalate into DNA, trap and inhibit topoisomerase IIα, an action that leads to the generation of double-strand DNA breaks, which activate ATM and DNA-PK mediated DNA repair pathways and Chk1 mediated G2 checkpoint pathway. ^