Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 5$\sp\prime$-mononucleotide prodrugs: Strategies to introduce nucleotides into cells

The neutral bis ((pivaloyloxy)methyl) (PIV$\sb2\rbrack$ derivatives of FdUMP, ddUMP, and AZTMP were synthesized as potential membrane-permeable prodrugs of FdUMP, ddUMP, and AZTMP. These compounds were designed to enter cells by passive diffusion and revert to the parent nucleotides after removal of the PIV groups by hydrolytic enzymes. These prodrugs were prepared by condensation of FUdR, ddU, and AZT with PIV$\sb2$ phosphate in the presence of triphenylphosphine and diethyl azodicarboxylate (the Mitsunobo reagent). PIV$\sb2$-FdUMP, PIV$\sb2$-ddUMP, and PIV$\sb2$-AZTMP were stable in the pH range 1.0-4.0 (t$\sb{1/2} = {>}$100 h). They were also fairly stable at pH 7.4 (t$\sb{1/2} = {>}$40 h). In 0.05 M NaOH solution, however, they were rapidly degraded (t$\sb{1/2} < 2$ min). In the presence hog liver carboxylate esterase, they were converted quantitatively to the corresponding phosphodiesters, PIV$\sb1$-FdUMP, PIV$\sb1$-ddUMP, and PIV$\sb1$-AZTMP; after 24 h incubation, only trace amounts of FdUMP, ddUMP, and AZTMP (1-5%) were observed indicating that the PIV$\sb1$ compounds were poor substrates for the enzyme. In human plasma, the PIV$\sb2$ compounds were rapidly degraded with half-lives of less than 5 min. The rate of degradation of the PIV$\sb2$ compounds in the presence of phosphodiesterase I was the same as that in buffer controls, indicating that they were not substrates for this enzyme. In the presence of phosphodiesterase I, PIV$\sb1$-FdUMP, PIV$\sb1$-ddUMP, and PIV$\sb1$-AZTMP were converted quantitatively to FdUMP, ddUMP, and AZTMP.^ PIV$\sb2$-ddUMP and PIV$\sb2$-AZTMP were effective at controlling HIV type 1 infection in MT-4 and CEM tk$\sp-$ cells in culture. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that PIV$\sb2$-ddUMP and PIV$\sb2$-AZTMP were taken up by the cells and converted to ddUTP and AZTTP, both potent inhibitors of HIV reverse transcriptase. However, a potential shortcoming of PIV$\sb2$-ddUMP and PIV$\sb2$-AZTMP as clinical therapeutic agents is that they are rapidly degraded (t$\sb{1/2}$ = approx. 4 minutes) in human plasma by carboxylate esterases. To circumvent this limitation, chemically-labile nucleotide prodrugs and liposome-encapsulated nucleotide prodrugs were investigated. In the former approach, the protective groups bis(N, N-(dimethyl)carbamoyloxymethyl) (DM$\sb2$) and bis (N-(piperidino)carbamoyloxymethyl) (DP$\sb2$) were used to synthesize DM$\sb2$-ddUMP and DP$\sb2$-ddUMP, respectively. In aqueous buffers (pH range 1.0-9.0) these compounds were degraded with half-lives of 3 to 4 h. They had similar half-lives in human plasma demonstrating that they were resistant to esterase-mediated cleavage. However, neither compound gave rise to significant concentrations of ddUMP in CEM or CEM tk$\sp-$ cells. In the liposome-encapsulated nucleotide prodrug approach, three different liposomal formulations of PIV$\sb2$-ddUMP (L-PIV$\sb2$-ddUMP) were investigated. The half-lifes of these L-PIV$\sb2$-ddUMP preparations in human plasma were 2 h compared with 4 min for the free drug. The preparations were more effective at controlling HIV-1 infection than free PIV$\sb2$-ddUMP in human T cells in culture. Collectively, these data indicate that PIV$\sb2$-FdUMP, PIV$\sb2$-ddUMP, and PIV$\sb2$-AZTMP are effective membrane-permeable prodrugs of FdUMP, ddUMP, and AZTMP. ^

Molecular and genetic analyses of Fgf signaling during cardiac outflow tract development

Epithelial-mesenchymal tissue interactions regulate the development of derivatives of the caudal pharyngeal arches (PAs) to govern the ultimate morphogenesis of the aortic arch and outflow tract (OFT) of the heart. Disruption of these signaling pathways is thought to contribute to the pathology of a significant proportion of congenital cardiovascular defects in humans. In this study, I tested whether Fibroblast Growth Factor 15 (Fgf15), a secreted signaling molecule expressed within the PAs, is an extracellular mediator of tissue interactions during PA and OFT development. Analyses of Fgf15−/− mouse embryonic hearts revealed abnormalities primarily localized to the OFT, correlating with aberrant cardiac neural crest cell behavior. The T-box-containing transcription factor Tbx1 has been implicated in the cardiovascular defects associated with the human 22q11 Deletion Syndromes, and regulates the expression of other Fgf family members within the mouse PAs. However, expression and genetic interaction studies incorporating mice deficient for Tbx1, its upstream regulator, Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), or its putative downstream effector, Fgf8, indicated that Fgf15 functions during OFT development in a manner independent of these factors. Rather, analyses of compound mutant mice indicated that Fgf15 and Fgf9, an additional Fgf family member expressed within the PAs, genetically interact, providing insight into the factors acting in conjunction with Fgf15 during OFT development. Finally, in an effort to further characterize this Fgf15-mediated developmental pathway, promoter deletion analyses were employed to isolate a 415bp sequence 7.1Kb 5′ to the Fgf15 transcription start site both necessary and sufficient to drive reporter gene expression within the epithelium of the PAs. Sequence comparisons among multiple mammalian species facilitated the identification of evolutionarily conserved potential trans-acting factor binding sites within this fragment. Subsequent studies will investigate the molecular pathway(s) through which Fgf15 functions via identification of factors that bind to this element to govern Fgf15 gene expression. Furthermore, targeted deletion of this element will establish the developmental requirement for pharyngeal epithelium-derived Fgf15 signaling function. Taken as a whole, these data demonstrate that Fgf15 is a component of a novel, Tbx1-independent molecular pathway, functioning within the PAs in a manner cooperative with Fgf9, required for proper development of the cardiac OFT. ^

Optimization of a DNSH passive sampling method to measure airborne carbonyls

Various airborne aldehydes and ketones (i.e., airborne carbonyls) present in outdoor, indoor, and personal air pose a risk to human health at present environmental concentrations. To date, there is no adequate, simple-to-use sampler for monitoring carbonyls at parts per billion concentrations in personal air. The Passive Aldehydes and Ketones Sampler (PAKS) originally developed for this purpose has been found to be unreliable in a number of relatively recent field studies. The PAKS method uses dansylhydrazine, DNSH, as the derivatization agent to produce aldehyde derivatives that are analyzed by HPLC with fluorescence detection. The reasons for the poor performance of the PAKS are not known but it is hypothesized that the chemical derivatization conditions and reaction kinetics combined with a relatively low sampling rate may play a role. This study evaluated the effect of absorption and emission wavelengths, pH of the DNSH coating solution, extraction solvent, and time post-extraction for the yield and stability of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein DNSH derivatives. The results suggest that the optimum conditions for the analysis of DNSHydrazones are the following. The excitation and emission wavelengths for HPLC analysis should be at 250nm and 500nm, respectively. The optimal pH of the coating solution appears to be pH 2 because it improves the formation of di-derivatized acrolein DNSHydrazones without affecting the response of the derivatives of the formaldehyde and acetaldehyde derivatives. Acetonitrile is the preferable extraction solvent while the optimal time to analyze the aldehyde derivatives is 72 hours post-extraction. ^

Cytochrome P450 4F isoforms in different species: Identification, gene regulation and putative roles in inflammation

The cytochrome P450 4F subfamily comprises a group of enzymes that metabolize derivatives of arachidonic acid such as prostaglandins, lipoxins leukotrienes and hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids, which are important mediators involved in the inflammatory response. Therefore, we speculate that CYP4Fs might be able to modulate the extent of the inflammation by controlling of the tissue levels of these inflammatory mediators, especially, leukotriene B4. One way to provide support for this hypothesis is to test whether the expression of CYP4Fs changes under inflammatory conditions, since these changes are required to adjust the levels of inflammatory mediators. ^ A lipopolysacchride (LPS) induced rat inflammation model was used to analyze the expressions of rat CYP4F4 and CYP4F5 in liver and kidney. LPS administration did not change the constitutive expression level of CYP4F4 and CYP4F5. In liver, the expressions of CYP4F4 and CYP4F5 decreased to 50–60% of the untreated level. The same effect of LPS on CYP4F4 and CYP4F5 expression can be mimicked in hepatocyte primary cultures treated with LPS, indicating a direct of effect of LPS on hepatocytes. LPS treatment also decreased the activity of liver microsomes towards chlorpromazine, however, antibody inhibition study revealed that liver CYP4Fs are not the only players in metabolizing chlorpromazine. To study further the underlying mechanism, CYP4F5 gene was isolated, characterized, and the promoter region was defined. ^ Accumulating evidence showed that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) play an active role in inflammation. To investigate the possible role of PPARα in regulating CYP4F expression by inflammation or by clofibrate treatment, the expressions of two new mouse 4F isoforms were analyzed in PPARα knockout mice upon LPS or clofibrate challenge. A novel induction of CYP4F15 by LPS and clofibrate was observed in kidney, and this effect is totally dependent on the presence of PPARα. Renal CYP4F16 expression was not affected by LPS or clofibrate in both (+/+) and (−/−) mice. In contrast, hepatic expressions of CYP4F15 and CYP4F16 were reduced significantly in (+/+) mice, but much less in (−/−) mice, suggesting that PPARα is partially responsible for this down-regulation. Clofibrate treatment reduced the expression of CYP4F16 in liver, but has no effect on CYP4F15 and PPARα does not have a role in hepatic CYP4F expression regulated by clofibrate. In general, CYP4Fs are regulated in an isoform-, tissue- and species-specific manner. ^ A human CYP4F isoform, CYP4F11, was isolated. The genomic structure was also solved by using database mining and bioinformatics tools. Localization of CYP4F11 to chromosome 19, 16 kb upstream of CYP4F2, suggests that human CYP4F genes may form a cluster on chromosome 19. This novel human 4F is highly expressed in liver, as well as in kidney, heart and skeletal muscle. Further study of the activity and gene regulation on CYP4F11 will provide us more insights into the physiological functions of CYP4F subfamily. ^