A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF FECAL POLLUTION IN DRINKING WATER (HYDROGEN SULFIDE, INDICATOR, MODIFICATION)

A new technique for the detection of microbiological fecal pollution in drinking and in raw surface water has been modified and tested against the standard multiple-tube fermentation technique (most-probable-number, MPN). The performance of the new test in detecting fecal pollution in drinking water has been tested at different incubation temperatures. The basis for the new test was the detection of hydrogen sulfide produced by the hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria which are usually associated with the coliform group. The positive results are indicated by the appearance of a brown to black color in the contents of the fermentation tube within 18 to 24 hours of incubation at 35 (+OR-) .5(DEGREES)C. For this study 158 water samples of different sources have been used. The results were analyzed statistically with the paired t-test and the one-way analysis of variance. No statistically significant difference was noticed between the two methods, when tested 35 (+OR-) .5(DEGREES)C, in detecting fecal pollution in drinking water. The new test showed more positive results with raw surface water, which could be due to the presence of hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria of non-fecal origin like Desulfovibrio and Desulfomaculum. The survival of the hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria and the coliforms was also tested over a 7-day period, and the results showed no significant difference. The two methods showed no significant difference when used to detect fecal pollution at a very low coliform density. The results showed that the new test is mostly effective, in detecting fecal pollution in drinking water, when used at 35 (+OR-) .5(DEGREES)C. The new test is effective, simple, and less expensive when used to detect fecal pollution in drinking water and raw surface water at 35 (+OR-) .5(DEGREES)C. The method can be used for qualitative and/or quantitative analysis of water in the field and in the laboratory. ^

RESPONSES OF INDICATOR AND PATHOGENIC BACTERIA TO THE PRESENCE OF CARBARYL IN WATER

Biodegradability is a desirable, if not a necessary characteristic of pesticides. Carbaryl, as Sevin, is one of the more widely used insecticides for the control of agricultural pests and has been reported to be readily degraded by microorganisms. Because of its broad application, the concentration of Sevin in surface waters has been reported to reach nearly four parts per million (PPM) in surface waters, where it has been reported to affect the growth and metabolic rates of aquatic bacterial populations. Following these reports, it is of public health importance to determine the effects of this insecticide on the growth and metabolic rates of bacteria used to indicate water pollution, and on pathogenic organisms which are found in polluted water.^ This study was conducted to determine the effect of carbaryl on the growth and metabolic rates of indicator and pathogenic organisms. Escherichia coli and Streptococcus faecalis were used as indicators, while Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhimurium were the pathogens studied. Pure and mixed cultures of these organisms were exposed to two concentrations of carbaryl (Sevin).^ The study demonstrated that the fecal pollution indicator organisms, E. coli and S. faecalis respond differently to the presence of small concentrations of carbaryl in water as do the two pathogens tested, (S. typhimurium and S. aureus). The growth of all test organisms as measured by spread plate counts, was reduced by the presence of either one mg/l or five mg/l carbaryl within a period of eight days. Survival of the organisms in the presence of five mg/l carbaryl varied dependent upon whether the organism was in pure or mixed culture. In the presence of five mg/l carbaryl, both pure and mixed culture of E. coli showed longer survival. S. faecalis survived for more than eight days in pure culture, neither S. typhimurium nor S. aureus survived for eight days in pure culture.^ The metabolic rate of S. faecalis and S. aureus was reduced by both five mg/l and one mg/l Sevin concentrations, contrary to E. coli and S. typhimurium which had reduced metabolic rate with the introduction of five mg/l Sevin but showed an increase in the metabolic rate with one mg/l Sevin. There was no difference between the test and control when mixed populations were exposed to five mg/l Sevin and the metabolic rate tested. A mixture of E. coli and S. typhimurium populations showed a respiration increase over the control when exposed to one mg/l Sevin concentration. If similar effects occur in polluted surface waters, misleading results from bacteriological water quality testing may occur. ^

The success of worksite nutrition and physical activity interventions with environmental modifications A systematic review

Background: As obesity increases among U.S. workers, employers are implementing programs to increase physical activity and improve diets. Although programs to address individual determinants of obesity have been evaluated, less is known about the effects of workplace programs that change environmental factors, because most reviews have not isolated environmental programs; the one that did was published in 2005. ^ Objective: To update the 2005 review to determine the effectiveness of workplace environmental interventions. ^ Methods: The Medline database was searched for published English language reports (2003-2011) of randomized controlled (RCTs) or quasi-experimental trials (NRCTs) that evaluated strategies to modify physical activity opportunities or food services, targeting employees at least 18 years, not including retirees and that provided data for at least one physical activity, dietary, or health risk indicator. Three coders independently extracted study characteristics and scored the quality of study methods. Program effectiveness was determined using the 2005 review's best evidence approach. ^ Results: Seven studies represented in nine reports met eligibility criteria; three focused on diet and the remainder targeted diet and physical activity interventions. All but one study received a high quality score for internal validity. The evidence for the effectiveness of workplace environmental interventions was at best, inconclusive for diet and physical activity and limited for health risk indicators. The outcome constructs were inconsistent across the studies. ^ Conclusions: Limitations in the methods of the 2005 review made it challenging to draw conclusions about findings for this review that include: variation in outcome measures, reliance on distal measures without proximal behavior change measures, no distinction between changes at the workplace versus outside the workplace, and inappropriate analyses of cluster designs that biased findings toward statistical significance. The best evidence approach relied on vote-counting, using statistical significance alone rather than effect size and confidence intervals. Future research should address these limitations and use more rigorous methods; systematic reviews should use methods of meta-analysis to summarize study findings. These recommendations will help employers to better understand how environmental modifications in the workplace can support their efforts to combat the effects of obesity among employees.^