6 resultados para element response
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
cAMP-response element binding (CREB) proteins are involved in transcriptional regulation in a number of cellular processes (e.g., neural plasticity and circadian rhythms). The CREB family contains activators and repressors that may interact through positive and negative feedback loops. These loops can be generated by auto- and cross-regulation of expression of CREB proteins, via CRE elements in or near their genes. Experiments suggest that such feedback loops may operate in several systems (e.g., Aplysia and rat). To understand the functional implications of such feedback loops, which are interlocked via cross-regulation of transcription, a minimal model with a positive and negative loop was developed and investigated using bifurcation analysis. Bifurcation analysis revealed diverse nonlinear dynamics (e.g., bistability and oscillations). The stability of steady states or oscillations could be changed by time delays in the synthesis of the activator (CREB1) or the repressor (CREB2). Investigation of stochastic fluctuations due to small numbers of molecules of CREB1 and CREB2 revealed a bimodal distribution of CREB molecules in the bistability region. The robustness of the stable HIGH and LOW states of CREB expression to stochastic noise differs, and a critical number of molecules was required to sustain the HIGH state for days or longer. Increasing positive feedback or decreasing negative feedback also increased the lifetime of the HIGH state, and persistence of this state may correlate with long-term memory formation. A critical number of molecules was also required to sustain robust oscillations of CREB expression. If a steady state was near a deterministic Hopf bifurcation point, stochastic resonance could induce oscillations. This comparative analysis of deterministic and stochastic dynamics not only provides insights into the possible dynamics of CREB regulatory motifs, but also demonstrates a framework for understanding other regulatory processes with similar network architecture.
Resumo:
CREB [CRE (cAMP-response element)-binding protein] is an important transcription factor that is differentially regulated in cells of various types. We recently reported that RA (retinoic acid) rapidly activates CREB without using RARs (RA receptors) or RXRs (retinoid X receptors) in NHTBE cells (normal human tracheobronchial epithelial cells). However, little is known about the role of RA in the physiological regulation of CREB expression in the early mucous differentiation of NHTBE cells. In the present study, we report that RA up-regulates CREB gene expression and that, using 5'-serial deletion promoter analysis and mutagenesis analyses, two Sp1 (specificity protein 1)-binding sites located at nt -217 and -150, which flank the transcription initiation site, are essential for RA induction of CREB gene transcription. Furthermore, we found that CREs located at nt -119 and -98 contributed to basal promoter activity. Interestingly, RA also up-regulated Sp1 in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Knockdown of endogenous Sp1 using siRNA (small interfering RNA) decreased RA-induced CREB gene expression. However, the converse was not true: knockdown of CREB using CREB siRNA did not affect RA-induced Sp1 gene expression. We conclude that RA up-regulates CREB gene expression during the early stage of NHTBE cell differentiation and that RA-inducible Sp1 plays a major role in up-regulating human CREB gene expression. This result implies that co-operation of these two transcription factors plays a crucial role in mediating early events of normal mucous cell differentiation of bronchial epithelial cells.
Resumo:
cAMP-response element binding (CREB) proteins are involved in transcriptional regulation in a number of cellular processes (e.g., neural plasticity and circadian rhythms). The CREB family contains activators and repressors that may interact through positive and negative feedback loops. These loops can be generated by auto- and cross-regulation of expression of CREB proteins, via CRE elements in or near their genes. Experiments suggest that such feedback loops may operate in several systems (e.g., Aplysia and rat). To understand the functional implications of such feedback loops, which are interlocked via cross-regulation of transcription, a minimal model with a positive and negative loop was developed and investigated using bifurcation analysis. Bifurcation analysis revealed diverse nonlinear dynamics (e.g., bistability and oscillations). The stability of steady states or oscillations could be changed by time delays in the synthesis of the activator (CREB1) or the repressor (CREB2). Investigation of stochastic fluctuations due to small numbers of molecules of CREB1 and CREB2 revealed a bimodal distribution of CREB molecules in the bistability region. The robustness of the stable HIGH and LOW states of CREB expression to stochastic noise differs, and a critical number of molecules was required to sustain the HIGH state for days or longer. Increasing positive feedback or decreasing negative feedback also increased the lifetime of the HIGH state, and persistence of this state may correlate with long-term memory formation. A critical number of molecules was also required to sustain robust oscillations of CREB expression. If a steady state was near a deterministic Hopf bifurcation point, stochastic resonance could induce oscillations. This comparative analysis of deterministic and stochastic dynamics not only provides insights into the possible dynamics of CREB regulatory motifs, but also demonstrates a framework for understanding other regulatory processes with similar network architecture.
Resumo:
Analyses of rat T1 kininogen gene/chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (T1K/CAT) constructs revealed two regions important for tissue-specific and induced regulation of T1 kininogen.^ Although the T1 kininogen gene is inducible by inflammatory cytokines, a highly homologous K kininogen gene is minimally responsive. Moreover, the basal expression of a KK/CAT construct was 5- to 7-fold higher than that of the analogous T1K/CAT construct. To examine the molecular basis of this differential regulation, a series of promoter swapping experiments was carried out. Our transfection results showed that at least two regions in the K kininogen gene are important for its high basal expression: a distal 19-bp region (C box) constituted a binding site for CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) family proteins and a proximal 66-bp region contained two adjacent binding sites for hepatocyte nuclear factor-3 (HNF-3). The distal HNF-3 binding site from the K kininogen promoter demonstrated a stronger affinity than that from the T1 kininogen promoter. Since C/EBP and HNF-3 are highly enriched in the liver and known to enhance transcription of liver-specific genes, differential binding affinities of these factors accounted for the higher basal expression of the K kininogen gene.^ In contrast to the K kininogen C box, the T1 kininogen C box does not bind C/EBP presumably due to their two-nucleotide divergence. This sequence divergence, however, converts it to a consensus binding sequence for two IL-6-inducible transcription factors--IL-6 response element binding protein and acute-phase response factor. To functionally determine whether C box sequences are important for their differential acute-phase response, T1 and K kininogen C boxes were swapped and analyzed after transfection into Hep3B cells. Our results showed that the T1 kininogen C box is indeed one of the IL-6 response elements in T1 kininogen promoter. Furthermore, its function can be modulated by a 5$\sp\prime$-adjacent C/EBP-binding site (B box) whose mutation significantly reduced the overall induced activity. Moreover, this B box is the target site for binding and transactivation of another IL-6 inducible transcription factor C/EBP$\delta.$ Evolutionary divergence of a few critical nucleotides can either lead to subtle changes in the binding affinities of a given transcription factor or convert a binding sequence for a constitutive factor to a site recognized by an inducible factor. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^
Resumo:
The slow/cardiac alkali myosin light chain (MLC1s/1c) is a member of a multigene family whose protein products are essential for activation of the myosin ATPase. In the adult, the MLC1s/1c isoform is expressed in both cardiac and slow-twitch skeletal muscles, while it is expressed by all skeletal muscles during development.^ To elucidate the molecular mechanisms that underlie the transcriptional regulation of MLC1s/1c gene expression, the immediate 5$\sp\prime$ flanking region of the gene was isolated and shown to be capable of directing reporter gene expression. Analysis of this region revealed a 110 bp muscle-specific enhancer that includes a myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor 2 (MEF-2) site, E-boxes, which are potential binding sites for the basic-helix-loop-helix proteins such as MyoD, and a MLC box. The focus of the thesis was to identify the role of the MLC box in expression of the MLC1s/1c gene.^ The MLC box is a member of the family of CArG box containing cis-acting DNA elements. Mutagenesis showed that the MLC box is necessary, but not sufficient, for the expression of a reporter gene linked to the 5$\sp\prime$ flanking region of the MLC1s/1c gene. Linker scanner and site-directed mutagenesis identified a number of potential sites within the 110 bp muscle-specific enhancer that may cooperate with the MLC box. These are the MEF-2 site, the E-box site, and a 10 bp element located upstream of the MEF-2 site that does not have sequence similarity with any known cis-acting element. The MLC box is capable of binding to factors present in muscle nuclear extracts, as well as to human recombinant serum response factor (SRF). Binding of SRF to the MLC box was correlated with the ability of the 5$\sp\prime$ flanking region of the MLC1s/1c gene to drive reporter gene expression. Results suggest a model in which binding of SRF to the MLC box activates expression of the MLC1s/1c gene while binding of the factors present in the nuclear extracts suppresses the expression of the gene. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.) ^
Resumo:
Retinoids are Vitamin A derivatives that are effective chemopreventative and chemotherapeutic agents for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Despite the wide application of retinoids in cancer treatment, the mechanism by which retinoids inhibit head and neck squamous cell carcinomas is not completely understood. While in vitro models show that drugs affect cell proliferation and differentiation, in vivo models, such as tumor xenografts in nude mice drugs affect more complex parameters such as extracellular matrix formation, angiogenesis and inflammation. Therefore, we studied the effects of retinoids on the growth of the 22B HNSCC tumors using a xenograft model. In this system, retinoids had no effect on tumor cell differentiation but caused invasion of the tumor by inflammatory cells. Retinoid induced inflammation lead to tumor cell death and tumor regression. Therefore, we hypothesized that retinoids stimulated the 22B HNSCC xenografts to produce a pro-inflammatory signal such as chemokines that in turn activated host inflammatory responses. ^ We used real time quantitative RT-PCR to measure cytokine and chemokine expression in retinoid treated tumors. Treatment of tumors with an RAR-specific retinoid, LGD1550, had no effect on the expression of TNFα, IL-1α, GROα, IP-10, Rantes, MCP-1 and MIP-1α but induced IL-8 mRNA 5-fold. We further characterized the retinoid effect on IL-8 expression on the 22B HNSCC and 1483 HNSCC cells in vitro. Retinoids increased IL-8 expression and enhanced TNFα-dependent IL-8 induction. In addition, retinoids increased the basal and TNFα-dependent expression of MCP-1 but decreased the basal and TNFα dependent expression of IP-10. The effect of retinoids on IL-8 and MCP-1 expression was very rapid with increased levels of mRNA detected within 1–2 hours. This effect did not require new protein synthesis and did not result from mRNA stabilization. Both RAR and RXR ligands increased IL-8 expression whereas only RAR ligands activated MCP-1 expression. ^ We identified a functional retinoid response element in the IL-8 promoter that was located adjacent to the C/EBP-NFkB response element. TNFα treatment of the 22B cells caused rapid, transient and selective acetylation of regions of the IL-8 promoter associated with the NFkB response element. Co-treatment of the cells with retinoids plus TNF increased the acetylation of chromatin in this region without altering the kinetics of acetylation. These results demonstrate that ligand activated retinoid receptors can cooperate with NFkB in histone acetylation and chromatin remodeling. We believe that in certain HNSCC tumors this cooperation and the resulting enhancement of IL-8 expression can induce an inflammatory response that leads to tumor regression. We believe that the induction of inflammation in susceptible tumors, possibly coupled with cytotoxic interventions may be an important component in the use of retinoids to treat human squamous cancers. ^