COMPARISON OF MEASUREMENTS OF ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER USING A WATER CALORIMETER AND IONIZATION CHAMBERS FOR CLINICAL RADIOTHERAPY PHOTON AND ELECTRON BEAMS

With the development of the water calorimeter direct measurement of absorbed dose in water becomes possible. This could lead to the establishment of an absorbed dose rather than an exposure related standard for ionization chambers for high energy electrons and photons. In changing to an absorbed dose standard it is necessary to investigate the effect of different parameters, among which are the energy dependence, the air volume, wall thickness and material of the chamber. The effect of these parameters is experimentally studied and presented for several commercially available chambers and one experimental chamber, for photons up to 25 MV and electrons up to 20 MeV, using a water calorimeter as the absorbed dose standard and the most recent formalism to calculate the absorbed dose with ion chambers.^ For electron beams, the dose measured with the calorimeter was 1% lower than the dose calculated with the chambers, independent of beam energy and chamber.^ For photon beams, the absorbed dose measured with the calorimeter was 3.8% higher than the absorbed dose calculated from the chamber readings. Such differences were found to be chamber and energy independent.^ The results for the photons were found to be statistically different from the results with the electron beams. Such difference could not be attributed to a difference in the calorimeter response. ^

Pencil -beam redefinition algorithm dose calculations for electron therapy treatment planning

The electron pencil-beam redefinition algorithm (PBRA) of Shiu and Hogstrom has been developed for use in radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). Earlier studies of Boyd and Hogstrom showed that the PBRA lacked an adequate incident beam model, that PBRA might require improved electron physics, and that no data existed which allowed adequate assessment of the PBRA-calculated dose accuracy in a heterogeneous medium such as one presented by patient anatomy. The hypothesis of this research was that by addressing the above issues the PBRA-calculated dose would be accurate to within 4% or 2 mm in regions of high dose gradients. A secondary electron source was added to the PBRA to account for collimation-scattered electrons in the incident beam. Parameters of the dual-source model were determined from a minimal data set to allow ease of beam commissioning. Comparisons with measured data showed 3% or better dose accuracy in water within the field for cases where 4% accuracy was not previously achievable. A measured data set was developed that allowed an evaluation of PBRA in regions distal to localized heterogeneities. Geometries in the data set included irregular surfaces and high- and low-density internal heterogeneities. The data was estimated to have 1% precision and 2% agreement with accurate, benchmarked Monte Carlo (MC) code. PBRA electron transport was enhanced by modeling local pencil beam divergence. This required fundamental changes to the mathematics of electron transport (divPBRA). Evaluation of divPBRA with the measured data set showed marginal improvement in dose accuracy when compared to PBRA; however, 4% or 2mm accuracy was not achieved by either PBRA version for all data points. Finally, PBRA was evaluated clinically by comparing PBRA- and MC-calculated dose distributions using site-specific patient RTP data. Results show PBRA did not agree with MC to within 4% or 2mm in a small fraction (<3%) of the irradiated volume. Although the hypothesis of the research was shown to be false, the minor dose inaccuracies should have little or no impact on RTP decisions or patient outcome. Therefore, given ease of beam commissioning, documentation of accuracy, and calculational speed, the PBRA should be considered a practical tool for clinical use. ^

Impact of BCR -ABL on DNA repair

The BCR-ABL fusion gene is the molecular hallmark of Philadelphia-positive leukemias. Normal Bcr is a multifunctional protein, originally localized to the cytoplasm. It has serine kinase activity and has been implicated in cellular signal transduction. Recently, it has been reported that Bcr can interact with xeroderma pigmentosum group B (XPB/ERCC3)—a nuclear protein active in UV-induced DNA repair. Two major Bcr proteins (p160 Bcr and p130Bcr) have been characterized, and our preliminary results using metabolic labeling and immunoblotting demonstrated that, while both the p160 and p130 forms of Bcr localized to the cytoplasm, the p130 form (and to a lesser extent p160) could also be found in the nucleus. Furthermore, electron microscopy confirmed the presence of Bcr in the nucleus and demonstrated that this protein associates with metaphase chromatin as well as condensed interphase heterochromatin. Since serine kinases that associate with condensed DNA are often cell cycle regulatory, these observations suggested a novel role for nuclear Bcr in cell cycle regulation and/or DNA repair. However, cell cycle synchronization analysis did not demonstrate changes in levels of Bcr throughout the cell cycle. Therefore we hypothesized that BCR serves as a DNA repair gene, and its function is altered by formation of BCR-ABL. This hypothesis was investigated using cell lines stably transfected with the BCR-ABL gene, and their parental counterparts (MBA-1 vs. M07E and Bcr-AblT1 vs. 4A2+pZAP), and several DNA repair assays: the Comet assay, a radioinimunoassay for UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), and clonogenic assays. Comet assays demonstrated that, after exposure to either ultraviolet (UV)-C (0.5 to 10.0 joules m −2) or to gamma radiation (200–1000 rads) there was greater efficiency of DNA repair in the BCR-ABL-transfected cells compared to their parental controls. Furthermore, after UVC-irradiation, there was less production of CPDs, and a more rapid disappearance of these adducts in BCR-ABL-bearing cells. UV survival, as reflected by clonogenic assays, was also greater in the BCR-ABL-transfected cells. Taken together, these results indicate that, in our systems, BCR-ABL confers resistance to UVC-induced damage in cells, and increases DNA repair efficiency in response to both UVC- and gamma-irradiation. ^