The survival role and the potential therapeutic targeting of MET in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a debilitating and incurable B-cell malignancy. Previous studies have documented that the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) plays a role in the pathobiology of MM. The receptor tyrosine kinase MET induced signaling initiates when its ligand HGF binds to the MET receptor. However, the direct importance of MET in MM has not been elucidated. The present work used three different but complementary approaches to reduce MET protein levels or its activity to demonstrate the importance of MET in MM. ^ In the first approach, MET transcript and protein levels were reduced by directly targeting the cellular MET transcripts using shRNA retroviral infection techniques. This direct reduction of MET mRNA leads to a reduction of MET protein levels, which caused an inhibition of growth and induction of cell death. ^ In the second approach, a global transcription inhibitor flavopiridol was used as a potential pharmacological tool to reduce MET levels. MET has a short half-life of 30 min for mRNA and 4 hours for protein; therefore using a RNA pol II inhibitor such as flavopiridol would be a viable option to reduce MET levels. When using flavopiridol in MM cell lines, there was a reduction of MET transcript and protein levels, which was associated with the induction of cell death. ^ Finally in the last strategy, MET kinase activity was suppressed by MP470, a small molecule inhibitor that binds to the ATP binding pocket in the kinase domain. At concentrations where phosphorylation of MET was inhibited there was induction of cell death in MM cell lines and primary cells from patients. In addition, in MM cell lines there was a decrease in phosphorylation of AKT (ser473) and caspase-9 (ser196); downstream of MET, suggesting that the mechanism of action for survival may be through these cascade of events. ^ Overall, this study provides a proof-of-principle that MET is important for the survival of MM cell lines as well as primary plasma cells obtained from patients. Therefore, targeting MET therapeutically may be a possible strategy to treat patients with this debilitating disease of MM. ^

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DEGREE OF BLOOD PRESSURE REDUCTION AND MORTALITY AMONG HYPERTENSIVES IN THE HYPERTENSION DETECTION AND FOLLOW-UP PROGRAM

The relationship between degree of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction and mortality was examined among hypertensives, ages 30-69, in the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program (HDFP). The HDFP was a multi-center community-based trial, which followed 10,940 hypertensive participants for five years. One-year survival was required for inclusion in this investigation since the one-year annual visit was the first occasion where change in blood pressure could be measured on all participants. During the subsequent four years of follow-up on 10,052 participants, 568 deaths occurred. For levels of change in DBP and for categories of variables related to mortality, the crude mortality rate was calculated. Time-dependent life tables were also calculated so as to utilize available blood pressure data over time. In addition, the Cox life table regression model, extended to take into account both time-constant and time-dependent covariates, was used to examine the relationship change in blood pressure over time and mortality.^ The results of the time-dependent life table and time-dependent Cox life table regression analyses supported the existence of a quadratic function which modeled the relationship between DBP reduction and mortality, even after adjusting for other risk factors. The minimum mortality hazard ratio, based on a particular model, occurred at a DBP reduction of 22.6 mm Hg (standard error = 10.6) in the whole population and 8.5 mm Hg (standard error = 4.6) in the baseline DBP stratum 90-104. After this reduction, there was a small increase in the risk of death. There was not evidence of the quadratic function after fitting the same model using systolic blood pressure. Methodologic issues involved in studying a particular degree of blood pressure reduction were considered. The confidence interval around the change corresponding to the minimum hazard ratio was wide and the obtained blood pressure level should not be interpreted as a goal for treatment. Blood pressure reduction was attributed, not only to pharmacologic therapy, but also to regression to the mean, and to other unknown factors unrelated to treatment. Therefore, the surprising results of this study do not provide direct implications for treatment, but strongly suggest replication in other populations. ^