Physician perceptions of risk regarding mood disorders and pharmacological management during pregnancy: What is current practice?

Mood disorders are the most common form of mental illness and one of the leading causes of morbidity worldwide. Major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder have a lifetime prevalence of 16.2% and 4.4%, respectively. Women comprise a substantial proportion of this population, and an estimated 500,000 pregnancies each year involve women with a psychiatric condition. Management with psychotropic medications is considered standard of care for most patients with mood disorders. However, many of these medications are known human teratogens. Because pregnant women with mood disorders face a high risk of relapse if unmanaged, the obstetrician faces a unique challenge in providing the best care to both mother and baby. It has been suggested that many obstetricians overestimate the teratogenic risks associated with psychotropic medications, while concurrently underestimating the risks associated with unmanaged mood disorders. This may be due a knowledge gap regarding the most current teratogen information, and lack of official management guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the current knowledge base of obstetricians regarding the teratogenic effects of common psychotropic medications, as wells as to capture current management practices for pregnant women with mood disorders. A total of 117 Texas obstetricians responded to a survey regarding teratogen knowledge and management practice. It was common for respondents to encounter women who disclose both having a mood disorder and taking a psychotropic medication during pregnancy. Many respondents did not utilize up-to-date drug counseling resources, and were unaware of or over-estimated the teratogenic risks of common medications used to treat mood disorders. Finally, many respondents reported wanting to refer pregnant patients with mood disorders to psychiatrists for co-management, but are reportedly restricted in doing so due to accessibility or insurance issues. This study demonstrates that there is a knowledge gap among obstetricians regarding the teratogenicity of common psychotropic medications utilized to manage a patient population they frequently encounter. Further, obstetricians have vastly different risk perceptions of these medications, resulting in various management approaches and recommendations. Future research should focus on establishing standard practice guidelines, as well as better accessibility to psychiatric services for pregnant women.

Cross currents in protein misfolding disorders: interactions and therapy.

Protein Misfolding Disorders (PMDs) are a group of diseases characterized by the accumulation of abnormally folded proteins. Despite the wide range of proteins and tissues involved, PMDs share similar molecular and pathogenic mechanisms. Several epidemiological, clinical and experimental reports have described the co-existence of PMDs, suggesting a possible cross-talk between them. A better knowledge of the molecular basis of PMDs could have important implications for understanding the mechanism by which these diseases appear and progress and ultimately to develop novel strategies for treatment. Due to their similar molecular mechanisms, common therapeutic strategies could be applied for the diseases in this group.

The identification and regulation of a novel interaction occurring between $\beta$-catenin and the actin -bundling protein fascin

Catenins were first characterized as linking the cytoplasmic domains of cadherin cell-cell adhesion molecules to the cortical actin cytoskeleton. In addition to their essential role in modulating cadherin adhesion, catenins have more recently been indicated to participate in cell and developmental signaling pathways. $\beta$-catenin, for example, associates directly with receptor tyrosine kinases and transcription factors such as LEF-1/TCF, and tranduces developmental signals within the Wnt pathway. $\beta$-catenin also appear to a role in regulating cell proliferation via its interaction with the tumor supressor protein APC. I have employed the yeast two-hybrid method to reveal that fascin, a bundler of actin filaments, binds to $\beta$-catenin's central Armadillo-repeat domain. The $\beta$-catenin-fascin interaction exists in cell lines as well as in animal brain tissues as revealed by immunoprecipitation analysis, and substantiated in vitro with purified proteins. Fascin additionally binds to plakoglobin, which contains a more divergent Armadillo-repeat domain. Fascin and E-cadherin utilize a similar binding-site within $\beta$-catenin, such that they form mutually exclusive complexes with $\beta$-catenin. Fascin and $\beta$-catenin co-localize at cell-cell borders and dynamic cell leading edges of epithelial and endothelial cells. Total immunoprecipitable b-catein has several isoforms, only the hyperphosphorylated isoform 1 associated with fascin. An increased $\beta$-catenin-fascin interaction was observed in HGF stimulated cells, and in Xenopus embryos injected with src kinase RNAs. The increased $\beta$-catenin association with fascin is correlated with increased levels of $\beta$-catenin phosphorylation. $\beta$-catenin, but not fascin, can be readily phosphorylated on tyrosine in vivo following src injection of embryos, or in vitro following v-src addition to purified protein components. These observations suggest a role of $\beta$-catenin phosphorylation in regulating its interaction with fascin, and src kinase may be an important regulator of the $\beta$-catenin-fascin association in vivo. The $\beta$-catenin-fascin interaction represents a novel catenin complex, that may conceivably regulate actin cytoskeletal structures, cell adhesion, and cellular motility, perhaps in a coordinate manner with its functions in cadherin and APC complexes. ^