3 resultados para bystander prejudice
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
At the fore-front of cancer research, gene therapy offers the potential to either promote cell death or alter the behavior of tumor-cells. One example makes use of a toxic phenotype generated by the prodrug metabolizing gene, thymidine kinase (HSVtk) from the Herpes Simplex Virus. This gene confers selective toxicity to a relatively nontoxic prodrug, ganciclovir (GCV). Tumor cells transduced with the HSVtk gene are sensitive to 1-50 $\mu$M GCV; normal tissue is insensitive up to 150-250 $\mu$M GCV. Utilizing these different sensitivities, it is possible to selectively ablate tumor cells expressing this gene. Interestingly, if a HSVtk$\sp+$ expressing population is mixed with a HSVtk$\sp-$ population at high density, all the cells are killed after GCV administration. This phenomenon for killing all neighboring cells is termed the "bystander effect", which is well documented in HSVtk$\sp-$ GCV systems, though its exact mechanism of action is unclear.^ Using the mouse colon carcinoma cell line CT26, data are presented supporting possible mechanisms of "bystander effect" killing of neighboring CT26-tk$\sp-$cells. A major requirement for bystander killing is the prodrug GCV: as dead or dying CT26tk$\sp+$ cells have no toxic effect on neighboring cells in its absence. In vitro, it appears the bystander effect is due to transfer of toxic GCV-metabolites, through verapamil sensitive intracellular-junctions. Additionally, possible transfer of the HSVtk enzyme to bystander cells after GCV addition, may play a role in bystander killing. A nude mouse model suggests that in a 50/50 (tk$\sp+$/tk$\sp-$) mixture of CT26 cells the bystander eradication of tumors does not involve an immune component. Additionally in a possible clinical application, the "bystander effect" can be directly exploited to eradicate preexisting CT26 colon carcinomas in mice by intratumoral implantation of viable or lethally irradiated CT26tk$\sp+$ cells and subsequent GCV administration. Lastly, an application of this toxic phenotype gene to a clinical marking protocol utilizing a recombinant adenoviral vector carrying the bifunctional protein GAL-TEK to eradicate spontaneously-arisen or vaccine-induced fibrosarcomas in cats is demonstrated. ^
Resumo:
Excessively high, accelerating lung cancer rates among women in Harris County, Texas, prompted this case-comparison study. Objectives were to compare patterns of employment, indirect exposures, and sociodemographic variables of lung cancer cases with comparison subjects (compeers) after standardizing for possible confounders, such as age and cigarette smoking. Lung cancer cases were microscopically confirmed, white, Harris County residents. Compeers, chosen from Medicare records and Texas Department of Public Safety records, were matched on gender, race, age, resident and vital status. Personal interviews were conducted with study subjects or next-of-kin. Industries and occupations were categorized as high risk, based on previous studies.^ Almost all cases (95.0%) and 60.0% of compeers smoked cigarettes. The odds ratio for lung cancer and smoking is 13.9. Stopping smoking between ages 30-50 years carries a lower risk than stopping at age 58 or more years. Women's employment in a high risk industry or occupation results in consistently elevated, smoking-adjusted odds ratios. Frequency and duration of employment demonstrate a moderate dose-response effect. A temporal association exists with employment in a high risk occupation during 1940-1949.^ No increased risk appeared with passive smoking. Husband's employment in a construction industry or a structural occupation significantly increased the smoking-adjusted odds ratios among cases and compeers (O.R. = 2.9, 2.2). Smoking-adjusted odds ratios increased significantly when women had resided with persons employed in cement (O.R. = 3.2) or insulation (O.R. = 5.5) manufacturing, or a high rise construction industry (O.R. = 2.4). A family history of lung cancer resulted in a two-fold increase in smoking-adjusted odds ratios. Vital status of compeers affected the odds ratios.^ Work-related exposures appear to increase the risk of lung cancer in women although cigarette smoking has the single highest odds ratio. Indirect exposure to certain employment also plays a significant role in lung cancer in women. Investigations of specific direct and indirect hazardous exposures in the workplace and home are needed. Cigarette smoking is as hazardous for women as for men. Smoking should be prevented and eliminated. ^
Resumo:
The management of HIV infection with antiretroviral drugs has succeeded in increasing survival rates, but the subject of pregnancy in HIV-positive women continues to garner debate. Discrimination and stigma have been identified as barriers to health care, suggesting that women with HIV may be disinclined to seek prenatal care if health-care workers exhibit negative attitudes toward the women's pregnancies. To optimize prenatal and medical care for women with HIV infection, it is important to understand the general social conditions and cultural context in which these women have children. Goffman's treatise on stigma, Foucault's discussion of the knowledge/power matrix, and Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory offer theoretical perspectives by which we can evaluate the gender, race, and class issues that are inherent in pregnancy decision-making for women with HIV infection. It is also necessary to evaluate prevailing attitudes on childbearing toward HIV-positive women and to review the historical background of prejudice in which HIV-positive women make decisions regarding childbearing. ^ This qualitative study used a survey instrument and one-on-one interviews with HIV-infected women to elicit their perceptions of how they were treated by care providers when they became pregnant. It also included interviews with health-care workers to determine what their feelings are about pregnancy within the context of HIV infection. Results of the ethnographic inquiry reveal that most of the women had negative experiences at some point during a pregnancy, but that the situation improved when they sought care from a provider who was familiar with HIV infection. The health-care providers interviewed were firm in their belief that HIV-positive women deserved optimal care and treated the women with respect, but these are individuals who are also experts in providing care to HIV-positive patients. The question remains as to what kind of care HIV-positive women are receiving generally and what types of attitudes they are being subjected to if they see less experienced providers. Further research is also needed to determine whether HIV-positive women from a broader ethnic representation and higher socioeconomic status experience similar negative attitudes. ^