DIRECT INPUTS TO OFF Α AND G9 GANGLION CELLS FROM AII AMACRINE CELLS IN RABBIT RETINA

In the mammalian retina, AII amacrine cells are essential in the rod pathway for dark-adapted vision. But they also have a “day job”, to provide inhibitory inputs to certain OFF ganglion cells in photopic conditions. This is known as crossover inhibition. Physiological evidence from several different labs implies that AII amacrine cells provide direct input to certain OFF ganglion cells. However, previous EM analysis of the rabbit retina suggests that the dominant output of the AII amacrine cell in sublamina a goes to OFF cone bipolar cells (Strettoi et al., 1992). Two OFF ganglion cell types in the rabbit retina, OFF α and G9, were identified by a combination of morphological criteria such as dendritic field size, dye coupling, mosaic properties and stratification depth. The AII amacrine cells (AIIs) were labeled with an antibody against calretinin and glycine receptors were marked with an antibody against the α1 subunit. This material was analyzed by triple-label confocal microscopy. We found the lobules of AIIs made close contacts at many points along the dendrites of individual OFF α and G9 ganglion cells. At these potential synaptic sites, we also found punctate labeling for the glycine receptor α1 subunit. The presence of a post-synaptic marker such as the α1 glycine receptor at contact points between AII lobules and OFF ganglion cells supports a direct inhibitory input from AIIs. This pathway provides for crossover inhibition in the rabbit retina whereby light onset provides an inhibitory signal to OFF α and G9 ganglion cells. Thus, these two OFF ganglion cell types receive a mixed excitatory and inhibitory drive in response to light stimulation.

Dopamine-stimulated dephosphorylation of connexin 36 mediates AII amacrine cell uncoupling.

Gap junction proteins form the substrate for electrical coupling between neurons. These electrical synapses are widespread in the CNS and serve a variety of important functions. In the retina, connexin 36 (Cx36) gap junctions couple AII amacrine cells and are a requisite component of the high-sensitivity rod photoreceptor pathway. AII amacrine cell coupling strength is dynamically regulated by background light intensity, and uncoupling is thought to be mediated by dopamine signaling via D(1)-like receptors. One proposed mechanism for this uncoupling involves dopamine-stimulated phosphorylation of Cx36 at regulatory sites, mediated by protein kinase A. Here we provide evidence against this hypothesis and demonstrate a direct relationship between Cx36 phosphorylation and AII amacrine cell coupling strength. Dopamine receptor-driven uncoupling of the AII network results from protein kinase A activation of protein phosphatase 2A and subsequent dephosphorylation of Cx36. Protein phosphatase 1 activity negatively regulates this pathway. We also find that Cx36 gap junctions can exist in widely different phosphorylation states within a single neuron, implying that coupling is controlled at the level of individual gap junctions by locally assembled signaling complexes. This kind of synapse-by-synapse plasticity allows for precise control of neuronal coupling, as well as cell-type-specific responses dependent on the identity of the signaling complexes assembled.

SIGNALING MECHANISMS THAT CONTROL GAP JUNCTIONAL COUPLING BETWEEN RETINAL NEURONS

Gap junctions between neurons form the structural substrate for electrical synapses. Connexin 36 (Cx36, and its non-mammalian ortholog connexin 35) is the major neuronal gap junction protein in the central nervous system (CNS), and contributes to several important neuronal functions including neuronal synchronization, signal averaging, network oscillations, and motor learning. Connexin 36 is strongly expressed in the retina, where it is an obligatory component of the high-sensitivity rod photoreceptor pathway. A fundamental requirement of the retina is to adapt to broadly varying inputs in order to maintain a dynamic range of signaling output. Modulation of the strength of electrical coupling between networks of retinal neurons, including the Cx36-coupled AII amacrine cell in the primary rod circuit, is a hallmark of retinal luminance adaptation. However, very little is known about the mechanisms regulating dynamic modulation of Cx36-mediated coupling. The primary goal of this work was to understand how cellular signaling mechanisms regulate coupling through Cx36 gap junctions. We began by developing and characterizing phospho-specific antibodies against key regulatory phosphorylation sites on Cx36. Using these tools we showed that phosphorylation of Cx35 in fish models varies with light adaptation state, and is modulated by acute changes in background illumination. We next turned our focus to the well-studied and readily identifiable AII amacrine cell in mammalian retina. Using this model we showed that increased phosphorylation of Cx36 is directly related to increased coupling through these gap junctions, and that the dopamine-stimulated uncoupling of the AII network is mediated by dephosphorylation of Cx36 via protein kinase A-stimulated protein phosphatase 2A activity. We then showed that increased phosphorylation of Cx36 on the AII amacrine network is driven by depolarization of presynaptic ON-type bipolar cells as well as background light increments. This increase in phosphorylation is mediated by activation of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors associated with Cx36 gap junctions on AII amacrine cells and by Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II activation. Finally, these studies indicated that coupling is regulated locally at individual gap junction plaques. This work provides a framework for future study of regulation of Cx36-mediated coupling, in which increased phosphorylation of Cx36 indicates increased neuronal coupling.

High-sensitivity rod photoreceptor input to the blue-yellow color opponent pathway in macaque retina.

Small bistratified cells (SBCs) in the primate retina carry a major blue-yellow opponent signal to the brain. We found that SBCs also carry signals from rod photoreceptors, with the same sign as S cone input. SBCs exhibited robust responses under low scotopic conditions. Physiological and anatomical experiments indicated that this rod input arose from the AII amacrine cell-mediated rod pathway. Rod and cone signals were both present in SBCs at mesopic light levels. These findings have three implications. First, more retinal circuits may multiplex rod and cone signals than were previously thought to, efficiently exploiting the limited number of optic nerve fibers. Second, signals from AII amacrine cells may diverge to most or all of the approximately 20 retinal ganglion cell types in the peripheral primate retina. Third, rod input to SBCs may be the substrate for behavioral biases toward perception of blue at mesopic light levels.

Screening of gap junction antagonists on dye coupling in the rabbit retina.

Many cell types in the retina are coupled via gap junctions and so there is a pressing need for a potent and reversible gap junction antagonist. We screened a series of potential gap junction antagonists by evaluating their effects on dye coupling in the network of A-type horizontal cells. We evaluated the following compounds: meclofenamic acid (MFA), mefloquine, 2-aminoethyldiphenyl borate (2-APB), 18-alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid, 18-beta-glycyrrhetinic acid (18-beta-GA), retinoic acid, flufenamic acid, niflumic acid, and carbenoxolone. The efficacy of each drug was determined by measuring the diffusion coefficient for Neurobiotin (Mills & Massey, 1998). MFA, 18-beta-GA, 2-APB and mefloquine were the most effective antagonists, completely eliminating A-type horizontal cell coupling at a concentration of 200 muM. Niflumic acid, flufenamic acid, and carbenoxolone were less potent. Additionally, carbenoxolone was difficult to wash out and also may be harmful, as the retina became opaque and swollen. MFA, 18-beta-GA, 2-APB and mefloquine also blocked coupling in B-type horizontal cells and AII amacrine cells. Because these cell types express different connexins, this suggests that the antagonists were relatively non-selective across several different types of gap junction. It should be emphasized that MFA was water-soluble and its effects on dye coupling were easily reversible. In contrast, the other gap junction antagonists, except carbenoxolone, required DMSO to make stock solutions and were difficult to wash out of the preparation at the doses required to block coupling in A-type HCs. The combination of potency, water solubility and reversibility suggest that MFA may be a useful compound to manipulate gap junction coupling.

The electrophysiology of glomerular mesangial cells

Glomerular mesangial cells (MC) are renal vascular cells that regulate the surface area of glomerular capillaries and thus, partly control glomerular filtration rate. Clarification of the signal transduction pathways and ionic mechanisms modulating MC tone are critical to understanding the physiology and pathophysiology of these cells, and the integrative role these cells play in fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. The patch clamp technique and an assay of cell concentration were used to electrophysiologically and pharmacologically analyze the ion channels of the plasmalemmal of human glomerular MC maintained in tissue culture. Moreover, the signal transduction pathways modulating channels involved in relaxation were investigated. Three distinct K$\sp+$-selective channels were identified: two low conductance channels (9 and 65pS) maintained MC at rest, while a larger conductance (206pS) K$\sp+$ channel was quiescent at rest. This latter channel was pharmacologically and biophysically similar to the large, Ca$\sp{2+}$-activated K$\sp+$ channel (BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$) identified in smooth muscle. BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ played an essential role in relaxation of MC. In cell-attached patches, the open probability (P$\rm\sb{o}$) of BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ increased from a basal level of $<$0.05 to 0.22 in response to AII (100nM)-induced mobilization of cytosolic Ca$\sp{2+}$. Activation in response to contractile signals (membrane depolarization and Ca$\sp{2+}$ mobilization) suggests that BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ acts as a low gain feedback regulator of contraction. Atrial natriuretic factor (ANF; 1.0$\mu$M) and nitroprusside (NP; 0.1mM), via the second messenger, cGMP, increase the feedback gain of BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$. In cell-attached patches bathed with physiological saline, these agents transiently activated BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ from a basal $\rm P\sb{o}<0.05$ to peak responses near 0.50. As membrane potential hyperpolarizes towards $\rm E\sb{K}$ (2-3 minutes), BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ inactivates. Upon depolarizing V$\rm\sb{m}$ with 140 mM KCl, db-cGMP (10$\mu$M) activated BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ to a sustained P$\rm\sb{o}$ = 0.51. Addition of AII in the presence of cGMP further increased P$\rm\sb{o}$ to 0.82. Activation of BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ by cGMP occured via an endogenous cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG): in excised, inside-out patches, PKG in the presence of Mg-ATP (0.1mM) and cGMP increased P$\rm\sb{o}$ from 0.07 to 0.39. In contrast, neither PKC nor PKA influenced BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$. Endogenous okadaic acid-sensitive protein phosphatase suppressed BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ activity. Binning the change in P$\rm\sb{o}\ (\Delta P\sb{o}$) of BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ in response to PKG (n = 69) established two distinct populations of channels: one that responded ($\cong$67%, $\rm\Delta P\sb{o} = 0.45 \pm 0.03$) and one that was unresponsive ($\Delta\rm P\sb{o} = 0.00 \pm 0.01$) to PKG. Activation of BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ by PKG resulted from a decrease in the Ca$\sp{2+}$- and voltage-activation thresholds independent of sensitivities. In conclusion, mesangial BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ channels sense both electrical and chemical signals of contraction and act as feedback regulators by repolarizing the plasma membrane. ANF and NO, via cGMP, stimulate endogenous PKG, which subsequently decreases the activation threshold of BK$\rm\sb{Ca}$ to increase the gain of this feedback regulatory signal. ^

Inputs to parasol ganglion cells in the primate retina

Retinal ganglion cells carry signals from the eye to the brain. One of the most common types of ganglion cells is parasol cells. They have larger dendritic trees, somas and axons than other ganglion cells. While much was known about parasol cell light responses, little was known about how these responses are formed. One possibility is that they receive input from a unique set of local circuit neurons that have similar responses. The goal was to identify these presynaptic neurons and study their synaptic connectivity.^ Ganglion cells receive input from bipolar and amacrine cells, but there are numerous subtypes of each. To determine which of these were most likely to provide input to parasol cells, the parasol cells were intracellularly-injected and then various bipolar and amacrine cells were immunolabeled and the tissue analyzed using a confocal microscope. DB3 bipolar cells labeled with antibodies to calbindin made extensive contacts with OFF parasol cells. Antibodies to recover in labeled flat midget bipolar cells (FMB). They made only random contacts with OFF parasol cells, and they are not expected to provide significant input. Type DB2 bipolar cells and FMB cells labeled with antibodies to excitatory amino acid transporter-2 made extensive contacts with OFF parasol cells. This suggests that DB2 bipolar cells are likely to provide input to parasol cells.^ Two types of amacrine cells were labeled in material containing injected parasol cells. Cholinergic amacrine cells were labeled with antibodies to choline acetyltransferase, and they made extensive contacts with ON parasol cells. The large amacrine cells labeled with antibodies to a precursor of cholecystokinin were among the amacrine cells that are tracer-coupled to parasol cells.^ From electron microscopic (EM) analysis, most of the synapses made by DB3 axons were found on varicosities. Some postsynaptic and presynaptic amacrine cells resembled AII amacrine cells. Others were relatively electron-lucent and may be cholinergic amacrine cells or cholecystokinin-containing amacrine cells. Gap junctions were found between neighboring DB3 axons. They occurred whenever two axons contacted each other, and the junctions were as large as the area of contact. In double-label EM experiments, DB3 axons made synapses onto OFF parasol cells. ^

Diversity of neuronal connexins in the mammalian retina

Many neurons in the mammalian retina are electrically coupled by intercellular channels or gap junctions, which are assembled from a family of proteins called connexins. Numerous studies indicate that gap junctions differ in properties such as conductance and tracer permeability. For example, A-type horizontal cell gap junctions are permeable to Lucifer Yellow, but B-type horizontal cell gap junctions are not. This suggests the two cell types express different connexins. My hypothesis is that multiple neuronal connexins are expressed in the mammalian retina in a cell type specific manner. Immunohistochemical techniques and confocal microscopy were used to localize certain connexins within well-defined neuronal circuits. The results of this study can be summarized as follows: AII amacrine cells, which receive direct input from rod bipolar cells, are well-coupled to neighboring AIIs. In addition, AII amacrine cells also form gap junctions with ON cone bipolar cells. This is a complex heterocellular network. In both rabbit and primate retina, connexin36 occurs at dendritic crossings in the AII matrix as well as between AIIs and ON cone bipolar cells. Coupling in the AII network is thought to reduce noise in the rod pathway while AII/bipolar gap junctions are required for the transmission of rod signals to ON ganglion cells. In the outer plexiform layer, connexin36 forms gap junctions between cones and between rods and cones via cone telodendria. Cone to cone coupling is thought to reduce noise and is partly color selective. Rod to cone coupling forms an alternative rod pathway thought to operate at intermediate light intensity. A-type horizontal cells in the rabbit retina are strongly coupled via massive low resistance gap junctions composed from Cx50. Coupling dramatically extends the receptive field of horizontal cells and the modulation of coupling is thought to change the strength of the feedback signal from horizontal cells to cones. Finally, there are other coupled networks, such as B-type horizontal cells and S1/S2 amacrine cells, which do not use either connexin36 or Cx50. These results confirm the hypothesis that multiple neuronal connexins are expressed in the mammalian retina and these connexins are localized to particular retinal circuits. ^