Inherited and noninherited sources of variation in metastasis and the growth rate of tumors: Implications for tumor evolution and therapy

I have undertaken measurements of the genetic (or inherited) and nongenetic (or noninherited) components of the variability of metastasis formation and tumor diameter doubling time in more than 100 metastatic lines from each of three murine tumors (sarcoma SANH, sarcoma SA4020, and hepatocarcinoma HCA-I) syngeneic to C3Hf/Kam mice. These lines were isolated twice from lung metastases and analysed immediately thereafter to obtain the variance to spontaneous lung metastasis and tumor diameter doubling time. Additional studies utilized cells obtained from within 4 passages of isolation. Under the assumption that no genetic differences in metastasis formation or diameter doubling time existed among the cells of a given line, the variance within a line would estimate nongenetic variation. The variability derived from differences between lines would represent genetic origin. The estimates of the genetic contribution to the variation of metastasis and tumor diameter doubling time were significantly greater than zero, but only in the metastatic lines of tumor SANH was genetic variation the major source of metastatic variability (contributing 53% of the variability). In the tumor cell lines of SA4020 and HCA-I, however, the contribution of nongenetic factors predominated over genetic factors in the variability of the number of metastasis and tumor diameter doubling time. A number of other parameters examined, such as DNA content, karyotype, and selection and variance analysis with passage in vivo, indicated that genetic differences existed within the cell lines and that these differences were probably created by genetic instability. The mean metastatic propensity of the lines may have increased somewhat during their isolation and isotransplantation, but the variance was only slightly affected, if at all. Analysis of the DNA profiles of the metastatic lines of SA4020 and HCA-I revealed differences between these lines and their primary parent tumors, but not among the SANH lines and their parent tumor. Furthermore, there was a direct correlation between the extent of genetic influence on metastasis formation and the ability of the tumor cells to develop resistance to cisplatinum. Thus although nongenetic factors might predominate in contributing to metastasis formation, it is probably genetic variation and genetic instability that cause the progression of tumor cells to a more metastatic phenotype and leads to the emergence of drug resistance. ^

FANCM AND FAAP24 MAINTAIN GENOMIC STABILITY THROUGH COOPERATIVE AND UNIQUE FUNCTIONS

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare recessive genetic disease with an array of clinical manifestations including multiple congenital abnormalities, progressive bone marrow failure and profound cancer susceptibility. A hallmark of cells derived from FA patients is hypersensitivity to DNA interstrand crosslinking agents such as mitomycin C (MMC) and cisplatin, suggesting that FA- and FA-associated proteins play important roles in protecting cells from DNA interstrand crosslink (ICL) damage. Two genes involved in the FA pathway, FANCM and FAAP24, are of particular interest because they contain DNA interacting domains. However, there are no definitive patient mutations for these two genes, and the resulting lack of human genetic model system renders their functional studies difficult. In this study, I established isogenic human FANCM- and FAAP24-null mutants through homologous replacement-mediated gene targeting in HCT-116 cells, and systematically investigated the functions of FANCM and FAAP24 inchromosome stability, FA pathway activation, DNA damage checkpoint signaling, and ICL repair. I found that the FANCM-/-/FAAP24-/- double mutant was much more sensitive to DNA crosslinking agents than FANCM-/- and FAAP24-/- single mutants, suggesting that FANCM and FAAP24 possess epistatic as well as unique functions in response to ICL damage. I demonstrated that FANCM and FAAP24 coordinately support the activation of FA pathway by promoting chromatin localization of FA core complex and FANCD2 monoubiqutination. They also cooperatively function to suppress sister chromatid exchange and radial chromosome formation, likely by limiting crossovers in recombination repair. In addition, I defined novel non-overlapping functions of FANCM and FAAP24 in response to ICL damage. FAAP24 plays a major role in activating ICL-induced ATR-dependent checkpoint, which is independent of its interaction with FANCM. On the other hand, FANCM promotes recombination-independent ICL repair independently of FAAP24. Mechanistically, FANCM facilitates recruitment of nucleotide excision repair machinery and lesion bypass factors to ICL damage sites through its translocase activity. Collectively, my studies provide mechanistic insights into how genome integrity is both coordinately and independently protected by FANCM and FAAP24.