Direct intrathecal implantation of mesenchymal stromal cells leads to enhanced neuroprotection via an NFkappaB-mediated increase in interleukin-6 production.

Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy has shown promise for the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although the mechanism(s) by which MSCs offer protection is unclear, initial in vivo work has suggested that modulation of the locoregional inflammatory response could explain the observed benefit. We hypothesize that the direct implantation of MSCs into the injured brain activates resident neuronal stem cell (NSC) niches altering the intracerebral milieu. To test our hypothesis, we conducted initial in vivo studies, followed by a sequence of in vitro studies. In vivo: Sprague-Dawley rats received a controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury with implantation of 1 million MSCs 6 h after injury. Brain tissue supernatant was harvested for analysis of the proinflammatory cytokine profile. In vitro: NSCs were transfected with a firefly luciferase reporter for NFkappaB and placed in contact culture and transwell culture. Additionally, multiplex, quantitative PCR, caspase 3, and EDU assays were completed to evaluate NSC cytokine production, apoptosis, and proliferation, respectively. In vivo: Brain supernatant analysis showed an increase in the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6. In vitro: NSC NFkappaB activity increased only when in contact culture with MSCs. When in contact with MSCs, NSCs show an increase in IL-6 production as well as a decrease in apoptosis. Direct implantation of MSCs enhances neuroprotection via activation of resident NSC NFkappaB activity (independent of PI3 kinase/AKT pathway) leading to an increase in IL-6 production and decrease in apoptosis. In addition, the observed NFkappaB activity depends on direct cell contact.

Poly(A)-binding protein-interacting protein 1 binds to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 to stimulate translation.

Poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) stimulates translation initiation by binding simultaneously to the mRNA poly(A) tail and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G). PABP activity is regulated by PABP-interacting (Paip) proteins. Paip1 binds PABP and stimulates translation by an unknown mechanism. Here, we describe the interaction between Paip1 and eIF3, which is direct, RNA independent, and mediated via the eIF3g (p44) subunit. Stimulation of translation by Paip1 in vivo was decreased upon deletion of the N-terminal sequence containing the eIF3-binding domain and upon silencing of PABP or several eIF3 subunits. We also show the formation of ternary complexes composed of Paip1-PABP-eIF4G and Paip1-eIF3-eIF4G. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the eIF3-Paip1 interaction promotes translation. We propose that eIF3-Paip1 stabilizes the interaction between PABP and eIF4G, which brings about the circularization of the mRNA.

Origins and evolution of VNTR loci: The apolipoprotein B 3$\sp\prime$ VNTR

I studied the apolipoprotein (apo) B 3$\sp\prime$ variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) and did computer simulations of the stepwise mutation model to address four questions: (1) How did the apo B VNTR originate? (2) What is the mutational mechanism of repeat number change at the apo B VNTR? (3) To what extent are population and molecular level events responsible for the determination of the contemporary apo B allele frequency distribution? (4) Can VNTR allele frequency distributions be explained by a simple and conservative mutation-drift model? I used three general approaches to address these questions: (1) I characterized the apo B VNTR region in non-human primate species; (2) I constructed haplotypes of polymorphic markers flanking the apo B VNTR in a sample of individuals from Lorrain, France and studied the associations between the flanking-marker haplotypes and apo B VNTR size; (3) I did computer simulations of the one-step stepwise mutation model and compared the results to real data in terms of four allele frequency distribution characteristics.^ The results of this work have allowed me to conclude that the apo B VNTR originated after an initial duplication of a sequence which is still present as a single copy sequence in New World monkey species. I conclude that this locus did not originate by the transposition of an array of repeats from somewhere else in the genome. It is unlikely that recombination is the primary mutational mechanism. Furthermore, the clustered nature of these associations implicates a stepwise mutational mechanism. From the high frequencies of certain haplotype-allele size combinations, it is evident that population level events have also been important in the determination of the apo B VNTR allele frequency distribution. Results from computer simulations of the one-step stepwise mutation model have allowed me to conclude that bimodal and multimodal allele frequency distributions are not unexpected at loci evolving via stepwise mutation mechanisms. Short tandem repeat loci fit the stepwise mutation model best, followed by microsatellite loci. I therefore conclude that there are differences in the mutational mechanisms of VNTR loci as classed by repeat unit size. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^